{"title":"二维视频分析在h测试中客观评估腿筋表现的信度和效度。","authors":"Caroline Prince, Sébastien Latella, Benoit Gachon, Brice Picot","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (V<sub>Mean</sub> and V<sub>max</sub>) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (<i>r</i>) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for V<sub>Mean</sub> (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for V<sub>Mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (<i>r</i> = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"985-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of 2D-video analysis to objectively assess hamstring performance during the H-test.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Prince, Sébastien Latella, Benoit Gachon, Brice Picot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (V<sub>Mean</sub> and V<sub>max</sub>) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (<i>r</i>) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for V<sub>Mean</sub> (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for V<sub>Mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (<i>r</i> = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"985-998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reliability and validity of 2D-video analysis to objectively assess hamstring performance during the H-test.
The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (VMean and Vmax) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (r) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for VMean (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and VMax (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for VMean (r = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and VMax (r = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (r = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher VMax (p < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (p < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic).
Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly.
Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.