二维视频分析在h测试中客观评估腿筋表现的信度和效度。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sports Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-08 DOI:10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132
Caroline Prince, Sébastien Latella, Benoit Gachon, Brice Picot
{"title":"二维视频分析在h测试中客观评估腿筋表现的信度和效度。","authors":"Caroline Prince, Sébastien Latella, Benoit Gachon, Brice Picot","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (V<sub>Mean</sub> and V<sub>max</sub>) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (<i>r</i>) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for V<sub>Mean</sub> (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for V<sub>Mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (<i>r</i> = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"985-998"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of 2D-video analysis to objectively assess hamstring performance during the H-test.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Prince, Sébastien Latella, Benoit Gachon, Brice Picot\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (V<sub>Mean</sub> and V<sub>max</sub>) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC<sub>2,1</sub>) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (<i>r</i>) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for V<sub>Mean</sub> (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for V<sub>Mean</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>r</i> = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (<i>r</i> = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher V<sub>Max</sub> (<i>p</i> < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (<i>p</i> < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"985-998\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2023.2203132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

h测试通常用于腿筋肌肉损伤后的恢复决定。主要目的是评估h检验的二维(2D)视频分析的可靠性。第二个目标是评估其有效性相比,电子陀螺仪(金标准),第三个目标是建立规范性的值。我们进行了一项包括30名健康个体的横断面研究。在h测试中,测量髋关节屈曲的平均、最大速度(VMean和Vmax)和活动范围(ROM),利用组内相关系数(ICC2,1)和测量标准误差(SEM)评估组间和重测信度。使用相关分析(r)和典型估计误差(TEE)来评估视频和陀螺仪之间的有效性。ROM的信度极好(ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), VMean的信度中等(ICC:0.57;(95%置信区间:0.32—-0.74))和VMax (ICC): 0.64(95%置信区间:0.43—-0.79))。视频和陀螺仪之间的VMean (r = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86])和VMax (r = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89])有很强的正相关,ROM (r = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93])有很强的正相关。雄性表现出较高的VMax (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of 2D-video analysis to objectively assess hamstring performance during the H-test.

The H-test is commonly used during return-to-sport decisions after hamstring muscle injury. The primary aim was to evaluate the reliability of two-dimensional (2D) video analysis for the H-Test. The second aim was to assess its validity compared to an electronic gyroscope (gold standard), and the third aim was to establish normative values. We conducted a cross-sectional study including 30 healthy individuals. Mean, maximal velocities (VMean and Vmax) and range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion were captured during the H-test to evaluate inter-rater and test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2,1) and standard error of measurement (SEM). Correlation analysis (r) and as typical error of estimate (TEE) were used to assess the validity between the video and the gyroscope. Reliability was excellent for ROM (ICC:0.91, [95% CI:0.83-0.95]), moderate for VMean (ICC:0.57; [95% CI:0.32-0.74]) and VMax (ICC:0.64, [95% CI:0.43-0.79]). Strong positive correlations were found between video and gyroscope for VMean (r = 0.79, [95% CI:0.71-0.86]) and VMax (r = 0.84, [95% CI:0.77-0.89]) and very strong for ROM (r = 0.89, [95% CI:0.85-0.93]). Males exhibited a higher VMax (p < 0.001) than females, while females had a higher ROM (p < 0.001). 2D-video analysis is a valid and reliable method to assess ROM during the H-Test and could easily be implemented in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信