COVID-19大流行期间葡萄牙大学生的心理负担

Sofia Tavares-Almeida, Diana Moura, Nuno Madeira, Margarida Figueiredo-Braga
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间葡萄牙大学生的心理负担","authors":"Sofia Tavares-Almeida,&nbsp;Diana Moura,&nbsp;Nuno Madeira,&nbsp;Margarida Figueiredo-Braga","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"8 2","pages":"e200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/0c/pj9-8-e200.PMC10158877.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Sofia Tavares-Almeida,&nbsp;Diana Moura,&nbsp;Nuno Madeira,&nbsp;Margarida Figueiredo-Braga\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Porto biomedical journal\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"e200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/0c/pj9-8-e200.PMC10158877.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Porto biomedical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大学生是心理健康问题的高危人群。本研究旨在评估新冠肺炎大流行对葡萄牙大学生的心理负担,并揭示与心理指标恶化相关的因素。方法:我们采用在线调查进行横断面研究,评估学生在大流行期间的观念、生活方式和心理健康状况。抑郁症状和风险采用《患者健康问卷-9》进行测量,心理弹性水平采用《心理弹性量表》进行量化。评估自我感知的焦虑水平和当前的心理健康状况。结果:从约30,000名受邀参加的学生中,获得了1751份回复,其中1447份被纳入。大多数学生是女性(72.3%),攻读硕士学位(58.4%)。回答最多的课程是工程学(25.5%),其次是医学(13.2%)。高焦虑水平、抑郁风险和低弹性水平的患病率分别为66.7%、37.3%和24.9%。与较好的心理结果相关的因素是男性、花更多时间学习、有工作、参加课外活动、体育锻炼和放松活动。相比之下,花更多时间看新闻、难以访问在线课程以及与家人或朋友缺乏联系的人的心理指标更差。尽管所有课程都表现出相当程度的抑郁症状,但建筑/艺术、科学和人文学科在抑郁量表上的得分明显更高。医学生的心理弹性水平明显高于其他专业。结论:我们的研究结果确定了与较差的心理结果相关的因素,可用于在当前和未来的大流行期间为大学生的心理健康制定保护措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological burden in Portuguese university students during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: University students are a risk population for mental health problems. This study aims to evaluate the psychological burden of the COVID-19 pandemic in Portuguese university students and to uncover factors associated with worse psychological indicators.

Methods: We used an online survey to perform a cross-sectional study that evaluated students' perceptions, lifestyle, and psychological well-being during the pandemic. Depression symptoms and risk were measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and resilience levels were quantified by the 9-item Resilience Evaluation Scale. Self-perceived levels of anxiety and current mental health status were evaluated.

Results: From a population of around 30,000 students invited to participate, 1751 responses were obtained and 1447 were included. Most students were female (72.3%) and were taking a master's degree (58.4%). The course with more responses was engineering (25.5%), followed by medicine (13.2%). The prevalence rates for higher anxiety levels, depression risk, and low resilience levels were 66.7%, 37.3%, and 24.9%, respectively. The factors associated with better psychological outcomes were being male, spending more time studying, having a job, performing extracurricular activities, physical exercise, and relaxing activities. By contrast, spending more time watching news, difficulty accessing online lectures, and absence of contact with family or friends were associated with worse psychological indicators. Although all courses presented substantial levels of depressive symptoms, architectures/arts, sciences, and humanities scored significantly more in the depression scale. Medicine students had significantly higher resilience levels compared with other courses.

Conclusions: Our findings identify factors associated with worse psychological outcomes and can be used to create protective measures for the mental health of university students during current and future pandemics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信