对 COVID-19 的学生症状决策树进行形成性评估。

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Maritza Salazar Campo, Nicole Miovsky, Margaret Schneider, Amanda Woodworth, Michelle DeHaven, Pamela Kahn, Michael Weiss, Dan M Cooper
{"title":"对 COVID-19 的学生症状决策树进行形成性评估。","authors":"Maritza Salazar Campo, Nicole Miovsky, Margaret Schneider, Amanda Woodworth, Michelle DeHaven, Pamela Kahn, Michael Weiss, Dan M Cooper","doi":"10.14485/hbpr.10.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In support of schools restarting during the COVID-19 pandemic, some schools partnered with local experts in academia, education, community, and public health to provide decision-support tools for determining what actions to take when presented with students at risk for spreading infection at school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Student Symptom Decision Tree, developed in Orange County, California, is a flow chart consisting of branching logic and definitions to assist school personnel in making decisions regarding possible COVID-19 cases in schools which was repeatedly updated to reflect evolving evidence-based guidelines. A survey of 56 school personnel evaluated the frequency of use, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, usability, and helpfulness of the Decision Tree.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tool was used at least 6 times a week by 66% of respondents. The Decision Tree was generally perceived as acceptable (91%), feasible (70%), appropriate (89%), usable (71%) and helpful (95%). Suggestions for improvement included reducing the complexity in content and formatting of the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggest that school personnel found value in the Decision Tree, which was intended to assist them with making decisions in a challenging and rapidly evolving pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":44486,"journal":{"name":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"1140-1152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156065/pdf/nihms-1878492.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formative Evaluation of a Student Symptom Decision Tree for COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Maritza Salazar Campo, Nicole Miovsky, Margaret Schneider, Amanda Woodworth, Michelle DeHaven, Pamela Kahn, Michael Weiss, Dan M Cooper\",\"doi\":\"10.14485/hbpr.10.1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In support of schools restarting during the COVID-19 pandemic, some schools partnered with local experts in academia, education, community, and public health to provide decision-support tools for determining what actions to take when presented with students at risk for spreading infection at school.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Student Symptom Decision Tree, developed in Orange County, California, is a flow chart consisting of branching logic and definitions to assist school personnel in making decisions regarding possible COVID-19 cases in schools which was repeatedly updated to reflect evolving evidence-based guidelines. A survey of 56 school personnel evaluated the frequency of use, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, usability, and helpfulness of the Decision Tree.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The tool was used at least 6 times a week by 66% of respondents. The Decision Tree was generally perceived as acceptable (91%), feasible (70%), appropriate (89%), usable (71%) and helpful (95%). Suggestions for improvement included reducing the complexity in content and formatting of the tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data suggest that school personnel found value in the Decision Tree, which was intended to assist them with making decisions in a challenging and rapidly evolving pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Behavior and Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"1140-1152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10156065/pdf/nihms-1878492.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Behavior and Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.10.1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Behavior and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14485/hbpr.10.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:为支持学校在 COVID-19 大流行期间重新开学,一些学校与当地学术界、教育界、社区和公共卫生专家合作,提供决策支持工具,以便在遇到有可能在学校传播感染的学生时决定采取何种行动:学生症状决策树 "是在加利福尼亚州橙县开发的,它是一个由分支逻辑和定义组成的流程图,用于帮助学校工作人员就学校中可能出现的 COVID-19 病例做出决策。对 56 名学校工作人员进行的调查评估了 "决策树 "的使用频率、可接受性、可行性、适当性、可用性和有用性:结果:66%的受访者每周至少使用该工具 6 次。受访者普遍认为 "决策树 "是可接受的(91%)、可行的(70%)、合适的(89%)、可用的(71%)和有用的(95%)。改进建议包括降低工具内容和格式的复杂性:数据表明,学校工作人员认为决策树很有价值,它旨在帮助他们在具有挑战性和快速发展的大流行病中做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formative Evaluation of a Student Symptom Decision Tree for COVID-19.

Objectives: In support of schools restarting during the COVID-19 pandemic, some schools partnered with local experts in academia, education, community, and public health to provide decision-support tools for determining what actions to take when presented with students at risk for spreading infection at school.

Methods: The Student Symptom Decision Tree, developed in Orange County, California, is a flow chart consisting of branching logic and definitions to assist school personnel in making decisions regarding possible COVID-19 cases in schools which was repeatedly updated to reflect evolving evidence-based guidelines. A survey of 56 school personnel evaluated the frequency of use, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, usability, and helpfulness of the Decision Tree.

Results: The tool was used at least 6 times a week by 66% of respondents. The Decision Tree was generally perceived as acceptable (91%), feasible (70%), appropriate (89%), usable (71%) and helpful (95%). Suggestions for improvement included reducing the complexity in content and formatting of the tool.

Conclusions: The data suggest that school personnel found value in the Decision Tree, which was intended to assist them with making decisions in a challenging and rapidly evolving pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Behavior and Policy Review
Health Behavior and Policy Review PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信