修改SEIRD模型的动态参数化,以分析和预测美国新冠肺炎疫情的动态。

IF 8.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 Mathematics
Orhun O Davarci, Emily Y Yang, Alexander Viguerie, Thomas E Yankeelov, Guillermo Lorenzo
{"title":"修改SEIRD模型的动态参数化,以分析和预测美国新冠肺炎疫情的动态。","authors":"Orhun O Davarci,&nbsp;Emily Y Yang,&nbsp;Alexander Viguerie,&nbsp;Thomas E Yankeelov,&nbsp;Guillermo Lorenzo","doi":"10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rapid spread of the numerous outbreaks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has fueled interest in mathematical models designed to understand and predict infectious disease spread, with the ultimate goal of contributing to the decision making of public health authorities. Here, we propose a computational pipeline that dynamically parameterizes a modified SEIRD (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-deceased) model using standard daily series of COVID-19 cases and deaths, along with isolated estimates of population-level seroprevalence. We test our pipeline in five heavily impacted states of the US (New York, California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas) between March and August 2020, considering two scenarios with different calibration time horizons to assess the update in model performance as new epidemiologic data become available. Our results show a median normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 2.38% and 4.28% in calibrating cumulative cases and deaths in the first scenario, and 2.41% and 2.30% when new data are assimilated in the second scenario, respectively. Then, 2-week (4-week) forecasts of the calibrated model resulted in median NRMSE of cumulative cases and deaths of 5.85% and 4.68% (8.60% and 17.94%) in the first scenario, and 1.86% and 1.93% (2.21% and 1.45%) in the second. Additionally, we show that our method provides significantly more accurate predictions of cases and deaths than a constant parameterization in the second scenario (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Thus, we posit that our methodology is a promising approach to analyze the dynamics of infectious disease outbreaks, and that our forecasts could contribute to designing effective pandemic-arresting public health policies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9.</p>","PeriodicalId":11696,"journal":{"name":"Engineering with Computers","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic parameterization of a modified SEIRD model to analyze and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Orhun O Davarci,&nbsp;Emily Y Yang,&nbsp;Alexander Viguerie,&nbsp;Thomas E Yankeelov,&nbsp;Guillermo Lorenzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rapid spread of the numerous outbreaks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has fueled interest in mathematical models designed to understand and predict infectious disease spread, with the ultimate goal of contributing to the decision making of public health authorities. Here, we propose a computational pipeline that dynamically parameterizes a modified SEIRD (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-deceased) model using standard daily series of COVID-19 cases and deaths, along with isolated estimates of population-level seroprevalence. We test our pipeline in five heavily impacted states of the US (New York, California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas) between March and August 2020, considering two scenarios with different calibration time horizons to assess the update in model performance as new epidemiologic data become available. Our results show a median normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 2.38% and 4.28% in calibrating cumulative cases and deaths in the first scenario, and 2.41% and 2.30% when new data are assimilated in the second scenario, respectively. Then, 2-week (4-week) forecasts of the calibrated model resulted in median NRMSE of cumulative cases and deaths of 5.85% and 4.68% (8.60% and 17.94%) in the first scenario, and 1.86% and 1.93% (2.21% and 1.45%) in the second. Additionally, we show that our method provides significantly more accurate predictions of cases and deaths than a constant parameterization in the second scenario (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Thus, we posit that our methodology is a promising approach to analyze the dynamics of infectious disease outbreaks, and that our forecasts could contribute to designing effective pandemic-arresting public health policies.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering with Computers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10129322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering with Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering with Computers","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)大流行的多次爆发的快速传播激发了人们对数学模型的兴趣,该模型旨在理解和预测传染病的传播,其最终目标是为公共卫生当局的决策做出贡献。在这里,我们提出了一个计算管道,该管道使用新冠肺炎病例和死亡的标准每日序列,以及对人群水平血清流行率的孤立估计,动态参数化修改的SEIRD(易感-易感染-康复-死亡)模型。2020年3月至8月,我们在美国五个受影响严重的州(纽约州、加利福尼亚州、佛罗里达州、伊利诺伊州和得克萨斯州)测试了我们的管道,考虑了两种具有不同校准时间范围的场景,以评估新的流行病学数据可用时模型性能的更新。我们的结果显示,在第一种情况下,校准累计病例和死亡人数时,中值归一化均方根误差(NRMSE)分别为2.38%和4.28%,在第二种情况下同化新数据时,中值标准化均方根误差分别为2.41%和2.30%。然后,校准模型的2周(4周)预测导致累积病例和死亡的中位NRMSE在第一种情况下分别为5.85%和4.68%(8.60%和17.94%),在第二种情况下为1.86%和1.93%(2.21%和1.45%)。此外,我们还表明,与第二种情况下的恒定参数化相比,我们的方法对病例和死亡的预测要准确得多(p 补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dynamic parameterization of a modified SEIRD model to analyze and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States.

Dynamic parameterization of a modified SEIRD model to analyze and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States.

Dynamic parameterization of a modified SEIRD model to analyze and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States.

Dynamic parameterization of a modified SEIRD model to analyze and forecast the dynamics of COVID-19 outbreaks in the United States.

The rapid spread of the numerous outbreaks of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has fueled interest in mathematical models designed to understand and predict infectious disease spread, with the ultimate goal of contributing to the decision making of public health authorities. Here, we propose a computational pipeline that dynamically parameterizes a modified SEIRD (susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered-deceased) model using standard daily series of COVID-19 cases and deaths, along with isolated estimates of population-level seroprevalence. We test our pipeline in five heavily impacted states of the US (New York, California, Florida, Illinois, and Texas) between March and August 2020, considering two scenarios with different calibration time horizons to assess the update in model performance as new epidemiologic data become available. Our results show a median normalized root mean squared error (NRMSE) of 2.38% and 4.28% in calibrating cumulative cases and deaths in the first scenario, and 2.41% and 2.30% when new data are assimilated in the second scenario, respectively. Then, 2-week (4-week) forecasts of the calibrated model resulted in median NRMSE of cumulative cases and deaths of 5.85% and 4.68% (8.60% and 17.94%) in the first scenario, and 1.86% and 1.93% (2.21% and 1.45%) in the second. Additionally, we show that our method provides significantly more accurate predictions of cases and deaths than a constant parameterization in the second scenario (p < 0.05). Thus, we posit that our methodology is a promising approach to analyze the dynamics of infectious disease outbreaks, and that our forecasts could contribute to designing effective pandemic-arresting public health policies.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00366-023-01816-9.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Engineering with Computers
Engineering with Computers 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
16.50
自引率
2.30%
发文量
203
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: Engineering with Computers is an international journal dedicated to simulation-based engineering. It features original papers and comprehensive reviews on technologies supporting simulation-based engineering, along with demonstrations of operational simulation-based engineering systems. The journal covers various technical areas such as adaptive simulation techniques, engineering databases, CAD geometry integration, mesh generation, parallel simulation methods, simulation frameworks, user interface technologies, and visualization techniques. It also encompasses a wide range of application areas where engineering technologies are applied, spanning from automotive industry applications to medical device design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信