Mark Juckett , Christopher Dandoy , Zachariah DeFilipp , Tamila L. Kindwall-Keller , Stephen R. Spellman , Celalettin Ustun , Bryce M. Waldman , Daniel J. Weisdorf , William A. Wood , Mary M. Horowitz , Linda J. Burns , Nandita Khera
{"title":"我们如何改进将新证据转化为造血细胞移植和细胞治疗的实践?","authors":"Mark Juckett , Christopher Dandoy , Zachariah DeFilipp , Tamila L. Kindwall-Keller , Stephen R. Spellman , Celalettin Ustun , Bryce M. Waldman , Daniel J. Weisdorf , William A. Wood , Mary M. Horowitz , Linda J. Burns , Nandita Khera","doi":"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The field of hematopoietic cell transplantation<span><span><span> and cell therapy (HCT/CT) is advancing rapidly to bring an ever-expanding collection of potentially curative therapies to patients with malignant and non-malignant </span>diseases<span>. The impact of these therapies depends on our ability to implement them as new evidence becomes available to advance the quality of care. There is often a long delay between evidence development and adoption of therapies based on that evidence into clinical practice. In this review, we describe the potential factors based on an implementation framework that could act as facilitators or barriers to adoption of therapies in the context of HCT/CT. We highlight two examples, the first to showcase the efforts to improve the efficiency of adoption of new findings and accelerate improvement in care of HCT/CT patients and the second to discuss the challenges in real world implementation of chimeric antigen receptor </span></span>T cell therapy. We conclude by reviewing strategies to improve translation of evidence and ways to measure their success.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":56139,"journal":{"name":"Blood Reviews","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101079"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do we improve the translation of new evidence into the practice of hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy?\",\"authors\":\"Mark Juckett , Christopher Dandoy , Zachariah DeFilipp , Tamila L. Kindwall-Keller , Stephen R. Spellman , Celalettin Ustun , Bryce M. Waldman , Daniel J. Weisdorf , William A. Wood , Mary M. Horowitz , Linda J. Burns , Nandita Khera\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.blre.2023.101079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The field of hematopoietic cell transplantation<span><span><span> and cell therapy (HCT/CT) is advancing rapidly to bring an ever-expanding collection of potentially curative therapies to patients with malignant and non-malignant </span>diseases<span>. The impact of these therapies depends on our ability to implement them as new evidence becomes available to advance the quality of care. There is often a long delay between evidence development and adoption of therapies based on that evidence into clinical practice. In this review, we describe the potential factors based on an implementation framework that could act as facilitators or barriers to adoption of therapies in the context of HCT/CT. We highlight two examples, the first to showcase the efforts to improve the efficiency of adoption of new findings and accelerate improvement in care of HCT/CT patients and the second to discuss the challenges in real world implementation of chimeric antigen receptor </span></span>T cell therapy. We conclude by reviewing strategies to improve translation of evidence and ways to measure their success.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"volume\":\"60 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000401\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268960X23000401","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
How do we improve the translation of new evidence into the practice of hematopoietic cell transplantation and cellular therapy?
The field of hematopoietic cell transplantation and cell therapy (HCT/CT) is advancing rapidly to bring an ever-expanding collection of potentially curative therapies to patients with malignant and non-malignant diseases. The impact of these therapies depends on our ability to implement them as new evidence becomes available to advance the quality of care. There is often a long delay between evidence development and adoption of therapies based on that evidence into clinical practice. In this review, we describe the potential factors based on an implementation framework that could act as facilitators or barriers to adoption of therapies in the context of HCT/CT. We highlight two examples, the first to showcase the efforts to improve the efficiency of adoption of new findings and accelerate improvement in care of HCT/CT patients and the second to discuss the challenges in real world implementation of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy. We conclude by reviewing strategies to improve translation of evidence and ways to measure their success.
期刊介绍:
Blood Reviews, a highly regarded international journal, serves as a vital information hub, offering comprehensive evaluations of clinical practices and research insights from esteemed experts. Specially commissioned, peer-reviewed articles authored by leading researchers and practitioners ensure extensive global coverage across all sub-specialties of hematology.