死亡调查和器官捐献系统的交叉:范围审查。

Q4 Medicine
Academic Forensic Pathology Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1177/19253621221106892
Mackenzie Cullip, Aimee J Sarti, Matthew J Weiss, Heather Whittingham, Maureen O Meade
{"title":"死亡调查和器官捐献系统的交叉:范围审查。","authors":"Mackenzie Cullip, Aimee J Sarti, Matthew J Weiss, Heather Whittingham, Maureen O Meade","doi":"10.1177/19253621221106892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Death investigators (DIs) such as coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists play important and evolving roles in deceased organ donation. DIs communicate with organ donation organizations (ODOs) to gather case-specific information and release or restrict organs depending on the medicolegal requirements. This scoping review aims to identify the breadth of roles and decision-making processes that may facilitate or hinder deceased donation in DI cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using a scoping literature review and subsequent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one eligible papers described 8 common themes with region-specific nuances. These include: 1) shared (ODO and DI) protocols for early communication around each case; 2) shared standards and education for death investigation practices related to organ donation; 3) DI support staff or teams to facilitate organ donation; 4) DI authority to order additional testing and imaging before organ recovery; 5) donation-specific legislation to enhance DI and/or ODO operations; 6) legally trained DI authority to veto medical decisions to proceed with organ donation; 7) DI attendance at organ recovery; and 8) surgeons recording specific DI evidence during organ recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings have cultural and resource-allocation implications and expose gaps in the international literature describing practices at the intersection of deceased organ donation and death investigation. A better understanding of the rationale and execution of various systems for DI and ODO cooperation may serve to advance both organ donation and death investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":36813,"journal":{"name":"Academic Forensic Pathology","volume":"12 2","pages":"65-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254011/pdf/10.1177_19253621221106892.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Intersection of Death Investigation and Organ Donation Systems: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie Cullip, Aimee J Sarti, Matthew J Weiss, Heather Whittingham, Maureen O Meade\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19253621221106892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Death investigators (DIs) such as coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists play important and evolving roles in deceased organ donation. DIs communicate with organ donation organizations (ODOs) to gather case-specific information and release or restrict organs depending on the medicolegal requirements. This scoping review aims to identify the breadth of roles and decision-making processes that may facilitate or hinder deceased donation in DI cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was conducted using a scoping literature review and subsequent thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one eligible papers described 8 common themes with region-specific nuances. These include: 1) shared (ODO and DI) protocols for early communication around each case; 2) shared standards and education for death investigation practices related to organ donation; 3) DI support staff or teams to facilitate organ donation; 4) DI authority to order additional testing and imaging before organ recovery; 5) donation-specific legislation to enhance DI and/or ODO operations; 6) legally trained DI authority to veto medical decisions to proceed with organ donation; 7) DI attendance at organ recovery; and 8) surgeons recording specific DI evidence during organ recovery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings have cultural and resource-allocation implications and expose gaps in the international literature describing practices at the intersection of deceased organ donation and death investigation. A better understanding of the rationale and execution of various systems for DI and ODO cooperation may serve to advance both organ donation and death investigation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"65-74\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9254011/pdf/10.1177_19253621221106892.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Forensic Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621221106892\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Forensic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19253621221106892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

死亡调查员(DIs),如验尸官、法医和法医病理学家在死者器官捐赠中发挥着重要的和不断发展的作用。与器官捐赠组织(ODOs)沟通,收集具体病例信息,并根据医学法律要求释放或限制器官。这一范围审查的目的是确定可能促进或阻碍死者遗体捐献的角色和决策过程的广度。方法:本研究采用范围文献综述和随后的专题分析。结果:31篇符合条件的论文描述了8个具有区域特异性细微差别的共同主题。这些包括:1)围绕每个案例进行早期通信的共享(ODO和DI)协议;2)与器官捐献相关的死亡调查实践的共享标准和教育;3)辅助人员或团队协助器官捐赠;4) DI有权要求在器官恢复前进行额外的检查和成像;5)针对捐赠的立法,以加强直接捐赠和/或在线捐赠的运作;6)经过合法培训的残障人士有权否决继续进行器官捐赠的医疗决定;7) DI参加器官恢复;8)外科医生在器官恢复过程中记录特定的DI证据。结论:这些发现具有文化和资源分配意义,并揭示了国际文献中描述死者器官捐赠和死亡调查交叉实践的差距。更好地理解DI和ODO合作的各种系统的原理和执行可能有助于推进器官捐赠和死亡调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Intersection of Death Investigation and Organ Donation Systems: A Scoping Review.

Introduction: Death investigators (DIs) such as coroners, medical examiners, and forensic pathologists play important and evolving roles in deceased organ donation. DIs communicate with organ donation organizations (ODOs) to gather case-specific information and release or restrict organs depending on the medicolegal requirements. This scoping review aims to identify the breadth of roles and decision-making processes that may facilitate or hinder deceased donation in DI cases.

Methods: This study was conducted using a scoping literature review and subsequent thematic analysis.

Results: Thirty-one eligible papers described 8 common themes with region-specific nuances. These include: 1) shared (ODO and DI) protocols for early communication around each case; 2) shared standards and education for death investigation practices related to organ donation; 3) DI support staff or teams to facilitate organ donation; 4) DI authority to order additional testing and imaging before organ recovery; 5) donation-specific legislation to enhance DI and/or ODO operations; 6) legally trained DI authority to veto medical decisions to proceed with organ donation; 7) DI attendance at organ recovery; and 8) surgeons recording specific DI evidence during organ recovery.

Conclusion: These findings have cultural and resource-allocation implications and expose gaps in the international literature describing practices at the intersection of deceased organ donation and death investigation. A better understanding of the rationale and execution of various systems for DI and ODO cooperation may serve to advance both organ donation and death investigation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Forensic Pathology
Academic Forensic Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信