Maartje E Zonderland, Gudrun Gudmundsdottir, Niels Juul, Camilla Bjerregaard, Kim Schulz Larsen, Gorm von Oettingen
{"title":"将手术室容量分配给非选择性神经外科患者,改善了奥胡斯大学医院选择性患者的准入和安全性。","authors":"Maartje E Zonderland, Gudrun Gudmundsdottir, Niels Juul, Camilla Bjerregaard, Kim Schulz Larsen, Gorm von Oettingen","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2023.2228916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study addresses surgical scheduling within the Department of Neurosurgery at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH). The department provides neurosurgical care to a population of 1.3 million in central Denmark, and has treatment obligations for specific neurosurgical diseases for the entire country, which has a population of 5.8 million. Efficient utilisation of the department's four operating suites is crucial to ensure that patients have timely access to both non-elective and elective neurosurgical procedures. Historically, the elective operating room (OR) schedule was made without consideration of the possible arrival of non-elective patients; consequently, elective surgeries were often cancelled to accommodate those with more urgent indications. The challenge was thus to introduce a structured way of planning for these non-elective surgical procedures that would minimise the need for cancelling elective surgeries without decreasing overall productivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mathematical model developed in a previous study at Leiden University Medical Center, the effect of allocating OR time during regular working hours for non-elective neurosurgical procedures at AUH was analysed, so that a weighted trade-off could be made between cancellations of elective patients due to an overflow of non-elective patients and unused OR time due to excessive reservation of time for non-elective patients. This allocation was tested in a six-week pilot study during weeks 24 & 25 and weeks 34-37 of 2020 before being implemented in 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 35 weeks following the implementation, the new allocation strategy resulted in a significant 77% decrease in the cancellation of elective neurosurgical procedures when compared with the same time period in 2019, with a significant 16% increase in surgical productivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that with mathematical modelling complex problems in the distribution of neurosurgical OR capacity can be solved, improving both patient safety and the working environment of neurosurgeons and OR staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"296-302"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allocating operating room capacity to non-elective neurosurgical patients improves access and safety for elective patients at Aarhus University Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Maartje E Zonderland, Gudrun Gudmundsdottir, Niels Juul, Camilla Bjerregaard, Kim Schulz Larsen, Gorm von Oettingen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02688697.2023.2228916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study addresses surgical scheduling within the Department of Neurosurgery at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH). The department provides neurosurgical care to a population of 1.3 million in central Denmark, and has treatment obligations for specific neurosurgical diseases for the entire country, which has a population of 5.8 million. Efficient utilisation of the department's four operating suites is crucial to ensure that patients have timely access to both non-elective and elective neurosurgical procedures. Historically, the elective operating room (OR) schedule was made without consideration of the possible arrival of non-elective patients; consequently, elective surgeries were often cancelled to accommodate those with more urgent indications. The challenge was thus to introduce a structured way of planning for these non-elective surgical procedures that would minimise the need for cancelling elective surgeries without decreasing overall productivity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a mathematical model developed in a previous study at Leiden University Medical Center, the effect of allocating OR time during regular working hours for non-elective neurosurgical procedures at AUH was analysed, so that a weighted trade-off could be made between cancellations of elective patients due to an overflow of non-elective patients and unused OR time due to excessive reservation of time for non-elective patients. This allocation was tested in a six-week pilot study during weeks 24 & 25 and weeks 34-37 of 2020 before being implemented in 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 35 weeks following the implementation, the new allocation strategy resulted in a significant 77% decrease in the cancellation of elective neurosurgical procedures when compared with the same time period in 2019, with a significant 16% increase in surgical productivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that with mathematical modelling complex problems in the distribution of neurosurgical OR capacity can be solved, improving both patient safety and the working environment of neurosurgeons and OR staff.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"296-302\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2228916\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2023.2228916","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Allocating operating room capacity to non-elective neurosurgical patients improves access and safety for elective patients at Aarhus University Hospital.
Introduction: This study addresses surgical scheduling within the Department of Neurosurgery at Aarhus University Hospital (AUH). The department provides neurosurgical care to a population of 1.3 million in central Denmark, and has treatment obligations for specific neurosurgical diseases for the entire country, which has a population of 5.8 million. Efficient utilisation of the department's four operating suites is crucial to ensure that patients have timely access to both non-elective and elective neurosurgical procedures. Historically, the elective operating room (OR) schedule was made without consideration of the possible arrival of non-elective patients; consequently, elective surgeries were often cancelled to accommodate those with more urgent indications. The challenge was thus to introduce a structured way of planning for these non-elective surgical procedures that would minimise the need for cancelling elective surgeries without decreasing overall productivity.
Methods: Using a mathematical model developed in a previous study at Leiden University Medical Center, the effect of allocating OR time during regular working hours for non-elective neurosurgical procedures at AUH was analysed, so that a weighted trade-off could be made between cancellations of elective patients due to an overflow of non-elective patients and unused OR time due to excessive reservation of time for non-elective patients. This allocation was tested in a six-week pilot study during weeks 24 & 25 and weeks 34-37 of 2020 before being implemented in 2021.
Results: In the 35 weeks following the implementation, the new allocation strategy resulted in a significant 77% decrease in the cancellation of elective neurosurgical procedures when compared with the same time period in 2019, with a significant 16% increase in surgical productivity.
Conclusions: This study shows that with mathematical modelling complex problems in the distribution of neurosurgical OR capacity can be solved, improving both patient safety and the working environment of neurosurgeons and OR staff.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide.
Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.