同行观摩教学:一种可行且有效的医生教师发展方法。

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2023-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-02-23 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2021.2019030
Macy Stockdill, Bailey Hendricks, Michael D Barnett, Marie Bakitas, Caroline N Harada
{"title":"同行观摩教学:一种可行且有效的医生教师发展方法。","authors":"Macy Stockdill, Bailey Hendricks, Michael D Barnett, Marie Bakitas, Caroline N Harada","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2021.2019030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physician faculty learn teaching skills informally while fighting competing professional obligations. One underutilized proven technique to improve teaching skills is peer observation with feedback. We aimed to understand benefits and challenges of a physician faculty development program based on peer observation of teaching and to develop best practice recommendations for future program development. The authors developed a peer observation-based physician faculty development program from 2015 to 2017. Two interviewers conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with 13 faculty participants and four non-participants using content analysis to identify themes and subthemes in NVivo©. Participant-identified program benefits included conveyed institutional support for teaching, the opportunity for peer observation with direct and timely feedback, the opportunity for community building, and overall program feasibility. Program challenges included competing scheduling demands, variability in feedback quality, and difficulty maintaining engagement for the program duration. Potential areas for improvement included participation incentives, external faculty involvement, assistance with program logistics and administration, and improvement in the consistency of the feedback experience. While peer observation is a valued approach to physician faculty development of teaching skills, competing demands on physicians may still limit program effectiveness. Program sustainability depends on optimizing feedback quality, boosting motivation for participation, and providing administrative support.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":"44 2","pages":"261-273"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.\",\"authors\":\"Macy Stockdill, Bailey Hendricks, Michael D Barnett, Marie Bakitas, Caroline N Harada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701960.2021.2019030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physician faculty learn teaching skills informally while fighting competing professional obligations. One underutilized proven technique to improve teaching skills is peer observation with feedback. We aimed to understand benefits and challenges of a physician faculty development program based on peer observation of teaching and to develop best practice recommendations for future program development. The authors developed a peer observation-based physician faculty development program from 2015 to 2017. Two interviewers conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with 13 faculty participants and four non-participants using content analysis to identify themes and subthemes in NVivo©. Participant-identified program benefits included conveyed institutional support for teaching, the opportunity for peer observation with direct and timely feedback, the opportunity for community building, and overall program feasibility. Program challenges included competing scheduling demands, variability in feedback quality, and difficulty maintaining engagement for the program duration. Potential areas for improvement included participation incentives, external faculty involvement, assistance with program logistics and administration, and improvement in the consistency of the feedback experience. While peer observation is a valued approach to physician faculty development of teaching skills, competing demands on physicians may still limit program effectiveness. Program sustainability depends on optimizing feedback quality, boosting motivation for participation, and providing administrative support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"44 2\",\"pages\":\"261-273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9395544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2021.2019030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/2/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2021.2019030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/2/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生教员在履行各种职业义务的同时,也在非正式地学习教学技能。同行观察与反馈是一种未得到充分利用的、行之有效的提高教学技能的方法。我们旨在了解基于同行教学观察的医生教师发展项目的益处和挑战,并为未来的项目发展提出最佳实践建议。作者在2015年至2017年期间制定了一项基于同行观察的医生教员发展计划。两名访谈者对 13 名教师参与者和 4 名非参与者进行了定性访谈,并使用 NVivo© 中的内容分析法对访谈进行了分析,以确定主题和次主题。参与者认为项目的益处包括传达了机构对教学的支持、有机会通过直接及时的反馈进行同行观察、有机会建立社区以及项目的整体可行性。项目面临的挑战包括时间安排上的竞争需求、反馈质量的不稳定性以及在项目持续期间保持参与的困难。潜在的改进领域包括参与激励、外部教师参与、项目后勤和管理协助,以及提高反馈体验的一致性。虽然同行观察是培养医生教学技能的重要方法,但对医生的竞争性要求仍可能限制项目的有效性。项目的可持续性取决于优化反馈质量、提高参与积极性以及提供行政支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer observation of teaching: A feasible and effective method of physician faculty development.

Physician faculty learn teaching skills informally while fighting competing professional obligations. One underutilized proven technique to improve teaching skills is peer observation with feedback. We aimed to understand benefits and challenges of a physician faculty development program based on peer observation of teaching and to develop best practice recommendations for future program development. The authors developed a peer observation-based physician faculty development program from 2015 to 2017. Two interviewers conducted and analyzed qualitative interviews with 13 faculty participants and four non-participants using content analysis to identify themes and subthemes in NVivo©. Participant-identified program benefits included conveyed institutional support for teaching, the opportunity for peer observation with direct and timely feedback, the opportunity for community building, and overall program feasibility. Program challenges included competing scheduling demands, variability in feedback quality, and difficulty maintaining engagement for the program duration. Potential areas for improvement included participation incentives, external faculty involvement, assistance with program logistics and administration, and improvement in the consistency of the feedback experience. While peer observation is a valued approach to physician faculty development of teaching skills, competing demands on physicians may still limit program effectiveness. Program sustainability depends on optimizing feedback quality, boosting motivation for participation, and providing administrative support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信