非人类灵长类神经科学全球合作的框架和资源

Renée Hartig , P. Christiaan Klink , Zlata Polyakova , Mohammad-Reza A. Dehaqani , Igor Bondar , Hugo Merchant , Wim Vanduffel , Anna Wang Roe , Atsushi Nambu , M. Thirumala , Amir Shmuel , Vishal Kapoor , Katalin M. Gothard , Henry C. Evrard , Michele A. Basso , Christopher I. Petkov , Anna S. Mitchell
{"title":"非人类灵长类神经科学全球合作的框架和资源","authors":"Renée Hartig ,&nbsp;P. Christiaan Klink ,&nbsp;Zlata Polyakova ,&nbsp;Mohammad-Reza A. Dehaqani ,&nbsp;Igor Bondar ,&nbsp;Hugo Merchant ,&nbsp;Wim Vanduffel ,&nbsp;Anna Wang Roe ,&nbsp;Atsushi Nambu ,&nbsp;M. Thirumala ,&nbsp;Amir Shmuel ,&nbsp;Vishal Kapoor ,&nbsp;Katalin M. Gothard ,&nbsp;Henry C. Evrard ,&nbsp;Michele A. Basso ,&nbsp;Christopher I. Petkov ,&nbsp;Anna S. Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As science and technology evolve, there is an increasing need for promotion of international scientific exchange. Collaborations, while offering substantial opportunities for scientists and benefit to society, also present challenges for those working with animal models, such as non-human primates (NHPs). Diversity in regulation of animal research is sometimes mistaken for the absence of common international welfare standards. Here, the ethical and regulatory protocols for 13 countries that have guidelines in place for biomedical research involving NHPs were assessed with a focus on neuroscience. Review of the variability and similarity in trans-national NHP welfare regulations extended to countries in Asia, Europe and North America. A tabulated resource was established to advance solution-oriented discussions and scientific collaborations across borders. Our aim is to better inform the public and other stakeholders. Through cooperative efforts to identify and analyze information with reference to evidence-based discussion, the proposed key ingredients may help to shape and support a more informed, open framework. This framework and resource can be expanded further for biomedical research in other countries.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72752,"journal":{"name":"Current research in neurobiology","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100079"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/c8/main.PMC10313859.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework and resource for global collaboration in non-human primate neuroscience\",\"authors\":\"Renée Hartig ,&nbsp;P. Christiaan Klink ,&nbsp;Zlata Polyakova ,&nbsp;Mohammad-Reza A. Dehaqani ,&nbsp;Igor Bondar ,&nbsp;Hugo Merchant ,&nbsp;Wim Vanduffel ,&nbsp;Anna Wang Roe ,&nbsp;Atsushi Nambu ,&nbsp;M. Thirumala ,&nbsp;Amir Shmuel ,&nbsp;Vishal Kapoor ,&nbsp;Katalin M. Gothard ,&nbsp;Henry C. Evrard ,&nbsp;Michele A. Basso ,&nbsp;Christopher I. Petkov ,&nbsp;Anna S. Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.crneur.2023.100079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As science and technology evolve, there is an increasing need for promotion of international scientific exchange. Collaborations, while offering substantial opportunities for scientists and benefit to society, also present challenges for those working with animal models, such as non-human primates (NHPs). Diversity in regulation of animal research is sometimes mistaken for the absence of common international welfare standards. Here, the ethical and regulatory protocols for 13 countries that have guidelines in place for biomedical research involving NHPs were assessed with a focus on neuroscience. Review of the variability and similarity in trans-national NHP welfare regulations extended to countries in Asia, Europe and North America. A tabulated resource was established to advance solution-oriented discussions and scientific collaborations across borders. Our aim is to better inform the public and other stakeholders. Through cooperative efforts to identify and analyze information with reference to evidence-based discussion, the proposed key ingredients may help to shape and support a more informed, open framework. This framework and resource can be expanded further for biomedical research in other countries.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100079\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fc/c8/main.PMC10313859.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X23000074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665945X23000074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

随着科学技术的发展,促进国际科学交流的需求越来越大。合作在为科学家提供大量机会并造福社会的同时,也给那些从事动物模型研究的人带来了挑战,如非人类灵长类动物(NHP)。动物研究监管的多样性有时被误认为缺乏共同的国际福利标准。在这里,对13个国家的伦理和监管协议进行了评估,这些国家制定了涉及NHP的生物医学研究指南,重点是神经科学。审查跨国家NHP福利法规的可变性和相似性,并将其扩展到亚洲、欧洲和北美国家。建立了一个表格资源,以促进以解决方案为导向的讨论和跨国界的科学合作。我们的目标是更好地向公众和其他利益相关者提供信息。通过合作努力,结合循证讨论来识别和分析信息,所提出的关键要素可能有助于形成和支持一个更知情、更开放的框架。这一框架和资源可以进一步扩大,用于其他国家的生物医学研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A framework and resource for global collaboration in non-human primate neuroscience

A framework and resource for global collaboration in non-human primate neuroscience

As science and technology evolve, there is an increasing need for promotion of international scientific exchange. Collaborations, while offering substantial opportunities for scientists and benefit to society, also present challenges for those working with animal models, such as non-human primates (NHPs). Diversity in regulation of animal research is sometimes mistaken for the absence of common international welfare standards. Here, the ethical and regulatory protocols for 13 countries that have guidelines in place for biomedical research involving NHPs were assessed with a focus on neuroscience. Review of the variability and similarity in trans-national NHP welfare regulations extended to countries in Asia, Europe and North America. A tabulated resource was established to advance solution-oriented discussions and scientific collaborations across borders. Our aim is to better inform the public and other stakeholders. Through cooperative efforts to identify and analyze information with reference to evidence-based discussion, the proposed key ingredients may help to shape and support a more informed, open framework. This framework and resource can be expanded further for biomedical research in other countries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信