在自适应碳离子处理工作流程中使用合成计算机断层扫描的可能性和挑战

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Barbara Knäusl , Peter Kuess , Markus Stock , Dietmar Georg , Piero Fossati , Petra Georg , Lukas Zimmermann
{"title":"在自适应碳离子处理工作流程中使用合成计算机断层扫描的可能性和挑战","authors":"Barbara Knäusl ,&nbsp;Peter Kuess ,&nbsp;Markus Stock ,&nbsp;Dietmar Georg ,&nbsp;Piero Fossati ,&nbsp;Petra Georg ,&nbsp;Lukas Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Anatomical surveillance during ion-beam therapy is the basis for an effective tumor treatment and optimal organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the X-ray based planning CT (X-rayCT) in photon radiotherapy and improve the workflow efficiency without additional imaging dose. The extension to carbon-ion radiotherapy is highly challenging; complex patient positioning, unique anatomical situations, distinct horizontal and vertical beam incidence directions, and limited training data are only few problems. This study gives insight into the possibilities and challenges of using sCTs in carbon-ion therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>For head and neck patients immobilised with thermoplastic masks 30 clinically applied actively scanned carbon-ion treatment plans on 15 CTs comprising 60 beams were analyzed. Those treatment plans were re-calculated on MRI based sCTs which were created employing a 3D U-Net. Dose differences and carbon-ion spot displacements between sCT and X-rayCT were evaluated on a patient specific basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Spot displacement analysis showed a peak displacement by 0.2 cm caused by the immobilisation mask not measurable with the MRI. 95.7% of all spot displacements were located within 1 cm. For the clinical target volume (CTV) the median <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> agreed within −0.2% (−1.3 to 1.4%), while the median <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0.01</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>cc</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> differed up to 4.2% (−1.3 to 25.3%) comparing the dose distribution on the X-rayCT and the sCT. OAR deviations depended strongly on the position and the dose gradient. For three patients no deterioration of the OAR parameters was observed. Other patients showed large deteriorations, <em>e.g.</em> for one patient <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> of the chiasm differed by 28.1%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The usage of sCTs opens several new questions, concluding that we are not ready yet for an MR-only workflow in carbon-ion therapy, as envisaged in photon therapy. Although omitting the X-rayCT seems unfavourable in the case of carbon-ion therapy, an sCT could be advantageous for monitoring, re-planning, and adaptation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54397,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/51/main.PMC10311249.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Knäusl ,&nbsp;Peter Kuess ,&nbsp;Markus Stock ,&nbsp;Dietmar Georg ,&nbsp;Piero Fossati ,&nbsp;Petra Georg ,&nbsp;Lukas Zimmermann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><p>Anatomical surveillance during ion-beam therapy is the basis for an effective tumor treatment and optimal organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the X-ray based planning CT (X-rayCT) in photon radiotherapy and improve the workflow efficiency without additional imaging dose. The extension to carbon-ion radiotherapy is highly challenging; complex patient positioning, unique anatomical situations, distinct horizontal and vertical beam incidence directions, and limited training data are only few problems. This study gives insight into the possibilities and challenges of using sCTs in carbon-ion therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>For head and neck patients immobilised with thermoplastic masks 30 clinically applied actively scanned carbon-ion treatment plans on 15 CTs comprising 60 beams were analyzed. Those treatment plans were re-calculated on MRI based sCTs which were created employing a 3D U-Net. Dose differences and carbon-ion spot displacements between sCT and X-rayCT were evaluated on a patient specific basis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Spot displacement analysis showed a peak displacement by 0.2 cm caused by the immobilisation mask not measurable with the MRI. 95.7% of all spot displacements were located within 1 cm. For the clinical target volume (CTV) the median <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>50</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> agreed within −0.2% (−1.3 to 1.4%), while the median <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>0.01</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>cc</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> differed up to 4.2% (−1.3 to 25.3%) comparing the dose distribution on the X-rayCT and the sCT. OAR deviations depended strongly on the position and the dose gradient. For three patients no deterioration of the OAR parameters was observed. Other patients showed large deteriorations, <em>e.g.</em> for one patient <span><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>D</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> of the chiasm differed by 28.1%.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The usage of sCTs opens several new questions, concluding that we are not ready yet for an MR-only workflow in carbon-ion therapy, as envisaged in photon therapy. Although omitting the X-rayCT seems unfavourable in the case of carbon-ion therapy, an sCT could be advantageous for monitoring, re-planning, and adaptation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54397,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8c/51/main.PMC10311249.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000642\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0939388922000642","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景和目的离子束治疗过程中的解剖监测是有效治疗肿瘤和保留最佳危险器官(OAR)的基础。基于磁共振成像(MRI)的合成计算机断层扫描(sCT)可以取代光子放射治疗中基于X射线的计划CT(X-rayCT),并在不增加成像剂量的情况下提高工作流程效率。扩展到碳离子放射治疗是极具挑战性的;复杂的患者定位、独特的解剖情况、不同的水平和垂直波束入射方向以及有限的训练数据只是少数问题。这项研究深入了解了在碳离子治疗中使用sCTs的可能性和挑战。材料和方法对于用热塑性口罩固定的头颈部患者,分析了临床应用的15个CT上的30个主动扫描碳离子治疗计划,包括60个波束。这些治疗计划是在使用3D U-Net创建的基于MRI的sCT上重新计算的。sCT和X射线CT之间的剂量差异和碳离子点位移在患者特定的基础上进行评估。结果点位移分析显示,位移峰值为0.2 cm,这是由不能用MRI测量的固定掩模引起的。95.7%的点位移位于1 对于临床目标体积(CTV),与X射线CT和sCT上的剂量分布相比,中值D50%在-0.2%(-1.3-1.4%)内一致,而中值D0.01cc差异高达4.2%(-1.3-25.3%)。OAR偏差很大程度上取决于位置和剂量梯度。对于三名患者,未观察到OAR参数的恶化。其他患者表现出严重的恶化,例如,对于一名患者,D2%的交叉差异为28.1%。结论sCTs的使用打开了几个新的问题,得出的结论是,我们还没有准备好在碳离子治疗中采用仅MR的工作流程,如光子治疗中所设想的那样。尽管在碳离子治疗的情况下,省略X射线CT似乎是不利的,但sCT可能有利于监测、重新规划和适应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow

Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow

Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow

Possibilities and challenges when using synthetic computed tomography in an adaptive carbon-ion treatment workflow

Background and purpose

Anatomical surveillance during ion-beam therapy is the basis for an effective tumor treatment and optimal organ at risk (OAR) sparing. Synthetic computed tomography (sCT) based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can replace the X-ray based planning CT (X-rayCT) in photon radiotherapy and improve the workflow efficiency without additional imaging dose. The extension to carbon-ion radiotherapy is highly challenging; complex patient positioning, unique anatomical situations, distinct horizontal and vertical beam incidence directions, and limited training data are only few problems. This study gives insight into the possibilities and challenges of using sCTs in carbon-ion therapy.

Materials and methods

For head and neck patients immobilised with thermoplastic masks 30 clinically applied actively scanned carbon-ion treatment plans on 15 CTs comprising 60 beams were analyzed. Those treatment plans were re-calculated on MRI based sCTs which were created employing a 3D U-Net. Dose differences and carbon-ion spot displacements between sCT and X-rayCT were evaluated on a patient specific basis.

Results

Spot displacement analysis showed a peak displacement by 0.2 cm caused by the immobilisation mask not measurable with the MRI. 95.7% of all spot displacements were located within 1 cm. For the clinical target volume (CTV) the median D50% agreed within −0.2% (−1.3 to 1.4%), while the median D0.01cc differed up to 4.2% (−1.3 to 25.3%) comparing the dose distribution on the X-rayCT and the sCT. OAR deviations depended strongly on the position and the dose gradient. For three patients no deterioration of the OAR parameters was observed. Other patients showed large deteriorations, e.g. for one patient D2% of the chiasm differed by 28.1%.

Conclusion

The usage of sCTs opens several new questions, concluding that we are not ready yet for an MR-only workflow in carbon-ion therapy, as envisaged in photon therapy. Although omitting the X-rayCT seems unfavourable in the case of carbon-ion therapy, an sCT could be advantageous for monitoring, re-planning, and adaptation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Zeitschrift fur Medizinische Physik (Journal of Medical Physics) is an official organ of the German and Austrian Society of Medical Physic and the Swiss Society of Radiobiology and Medical Physics.The Journal is a platform for basic research and practical applications of physical procedures in medical diagnostics and therapy. The articles are reviewed following international standards of peer reviewing. Focuses of the articles are: -Biophysical methods in radiation therapy and nuclear medicine -Dosimetry and radiation protection -Radiological diagnostics and quality assurance -Modern imaging techniques, such as computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography -Ultrasonography diagnostics, application of laser and UV rays -Electronic processing of biosignals -Artificial intelligence and machine learning in medical physics In the Journal, the latest scientific insights find their expression in the form of original articles, reviews, technical communications, and information for the clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信