使用具有二极管阵列检测器的高压液相色谱系统,通过直接肽反应性测定(DPRA)确定纳米颗粒对肽的反应性。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Toxicological Research Pub Date : 2023-05-16 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s43188-022-00166-w
Eun-Nam Kim, Jung-Ah Seo, Bae-Hwan Kim, Gil-Saeng Jeong
{"title":"使用具有二极管阵列检测器的高压液相色谱系统,通过直接肽反应性测定(DPRA)确定纳米颗粒对肽的反应性。","authors":"Eun-Nam Kim, Jung-Ah Seo, Bae-Hwan Kim, Gil-Saeng Jeong","doi":"10.1007/s43188-022-00166-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The possibility of inducing skin sensitization reactions following exposure to various chemicals can lead to skin diseases, and the evaluation of skin sensitivity to such substances is very important. However, as animal tests for skin sensitization are prohibited, the OECD Test Guideline 442 C was designated as part of an alternative testing method. Therefore, in this study, the reactivity of cysteine and lysine peptides to nanoparticle substrates was identified through HPLC-DAD analysis according to the skin sensitization animal replacement test method specified in the OECD Test Guideline 442 C. In this study, all criteria for skin sensitization experiments specified in OECD Test Guideline 442 C were satisfied. As a result of analyzing the disappearance rates of cysteine and lysine peptides for the five types of nanoparticle substrates (TiO<sub>2</sub>, CeO<sub>2</sub>, Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, NiO, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) using the established analytical method, all were identified as positive. Therefore, our findings suggest that basic data from this technique can contribute to skin sensitization studies by providing the depletion percentage of cysteine and lysine peptides for nanoparticle materials that have not yet been tested for skin sensitization.</p>","PeriodicalId":23181,"journal":{"name":"Toxicological Research","volume":"39 3","pages":"485-495"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining the reactivity of nanoparticles to peptides through direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) using a high pressure liquid chromatography system with a diode array detector.\",\"authors\":\"Eun-Nam Kim, Jung-Ah Seo, Bae-Hwan Kim, Gil-Saeng Jeong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43188-022-00166-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The possibility of inducing skin sensitization reactions following exposure to various chemicals can lead to skin diseases, and the evaluation of skin sensitivity to such substances is very important. However, as animal tests for skin sensitization are prohibited, the OECD Test Guideline 442 C was designated as part of an alternative testing method. Therefore, in this study, the reactivity of cysteine and lysine peptides to nanoparticle substrates was identified through HPLC-DAD analysis according to the skin sensitization animal replacement test method specified in the OECD Test Guideline 442 C. In this study, all criteria for skin sensitization experiments specified in OECD Test Guideline 442 C were satisfied. As a result of analyzing the disappearance rates of cysteine and lysine peptides for the five types of nanoparticle substrates (TiO<sub>2</sub>, CeO<sub>2</sub>, Co<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, NiO, and Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) using the established analytical method, all were identified as positive. Therefore, our findings suggest that basic data from this technique can contribute to skin sensitization studies by providing the depletion percentage of cysteine and lysine peptides for nanoparticle materials that have not yet been tested for skin sensitization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23181,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"485-495\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10313635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxicological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00166-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43188-022-00166-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

暴露于各种化学物质后引发皮肤致敏反应的可能性可能导致皮肤疾病,评估皮肤对这些物质的敏感性非常重要。然而,由于禁止进行皮肤致敏的动物试验,经合组织试验指南442 C被指定为替代试验方法的一部分。因此,在本研究中,根据OECD测试指南442 C中规定的皮肤致敏动物替代测试方法,通过HPLC-DAD分析鉴定了半胱氨酸和赖氨酸肽对纳米颗粒底物的反应性。在本研究中,符合OECD测试指南442 C中规定的所有皮肤致敏实验标准。使用所建立的分析方法分析五种类型的纳米颗粒底物(TiO2、CeO2、Co3O4、NiO和Fe2O3)的半胱氨酸和赖氨酸肽的消失率的结果,均被鉴定为阳性。因此,我们的研究结果表明,该技术的基本数据可以通过提供尚未进行皮肤致敏测试的纳米颗粒材料的半胱氨酸和赖氨酸肽的消耗百分比,为皮肤致敏研究做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Defining the reactivity of nanoparticles to peptides through direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) using a high pressure liquid chromatography system with a diode array detector.

The possibility of inducing skin sensitization reactions following exposure to various chemicals can lead to skin diseases, and the evaluation of skin sensitivity to such substances is very important. However, as animal tests for skin sensitization are prohibited, the OECD Test Guideline 442 C was designated as part of an alternative testing method. Therefore, in this study, the reactivity of cysteine and lysine peptides to nanoparticle substrates was identified through HPLC-DAD analysis according to the skin sensitization animal replacement test method specified in the OECD Test Guideline 442 C. In this study, all criteria for skin sensitization experiments specified in OECD Test Guideline 442 C were satisfied. As a result of analyzing the disappearance rates of cysteine and lysine peptides for the five types of nanoparticle substrates (TiO2, CeO2, Co3O4, NiO, and Fe2O3) using the established analytical method, all were identified as positive. Therefore, our findings suggest that basic data from this technique can contribute to skin sensitization studies by providing the depletion percentage of cysteine and lysine peptides for nanoparticle materials that have not yet been tested for skin sensitization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Toxicological Research is the official journal of the Korean Society of Toxicology. The journal covers all areas of Toxicological Research of chemicals, drugs and environmental agents affecting human and animals, which in turn impact public health. The journal’s mission is to disseminate scientific and technical information on diverse areas of toxicological research. Contributions by toxicologists, molecular biologists, geneticists, biochemists, pharmacologists, clinical researchers and epidemiologists with a global view on public health through toxicological research are welcome. Emphasis will be given to articles providing an understanding of the toxicological mechanisms affecting animal, human and public health. In the case of research articles using natural extracts, detailed information with respect to the origin, extraction method, chemical profiles, and characterization of standard compounds to ensure the reproducible pharmacological activity should be provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信