Jeremy D Jinkerson, Lisa H Lu, Jan Kennedy, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Jeremy T Nelson, Robert A Seegmiller
{"title":"槽钉板在预测精神症状报告上比记忆表观表现效度测试增加了增量值。","authors":"Jeremy D Jinkerson, Lisa H Lu, Jan Kennedy, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Jeremy T Nelson, Robert A Seegmiller","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2023.2192409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study evaluated whether Grooved Pegboard (GPB), when used as a performance validity test (PVT), can incrementally predict psychiatric symptom report elevations beyond memory-apparent PVTs. Participants (<i>N</i> = 111) were military personnel and were predominantly White (84%), male (76%), with a mean age of 43 (<i>SD =</i> 12) and having on average 16 years of education (<i>SD</i> = 2). Individuals with disorders potentially compromising motor dexterity were excluded. Participants were administered GPB, three memory-apparent PVTs (Medical Symptom Validity Test, Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test, Reliable Digit Span), and a symptom validity test (Personality Assessment Inventory Negative Impression Management [NIM]). Results from the three memory-apparent PVTs were entered into a model for predicting NIM, where failure of two or more PVTs was categorized as evidence of non-credible responding. Hierarchical regression revealed that non-dominant hand GPB T-score incrementally predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (<i>F</i>(2,108) = 16.30, <i>p</i> < .001; <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> change = .05, <i>β</i> = -0.24, <i>p</i> < .01). In a second hierarchical regression, GPB performance was dichotomized into pass or fail, using <i>T</i>-score cutoffs (≤29 for either hand, ≤31 for both). Non-dominant hand GPB again predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (<i>F</i>(2,108) = 18.75, <i>p</i> <.001; <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> change = .08, <i>β</i> = -0.28, <i>p</i> < .001). Results indicated that noncredible/failing GPB performance adds incremental value over memory-apparent PVTs in predicting psychiatric symptom report.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"597-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grooved Pegboard adds incremental value over memory-apparent performance validity tests in predicting psychiatric symptom report.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy D Jinkerson, Lisa H Lu, Jan Kennedy, Patrick Armistead-Jehle, Jeremy T Nelson, Robert A Seegmiller\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23279095.2023.2192409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study evaluated whether Grooved Pegboard (GPB), when used as a performance validity test (PVT), can incrementally predict psychiatric symptom report elevations beyond memory-apparent PVTs. Participants (<i>N</i> = 111) were military personnel and were predominantly White (84%), male (76%), with a mean age of 43 (<i>SD =</i> 12) and having on average 16 years of education (<i>SD</i> = 2). Individuals with disorders potentially compromising motor dexterity were excluded. Participants were administered GPB, three memory-apparent PVTs (Medical Symptom Validity Test, Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test, Reliable Digit Span), and a symptom validity test (Personality Assessment Inventory Negative Impression Management [NIM]). Results from the three memory-apparent PVTs were entered into a model for predicting NIM, where failure of two or more PVTs was categorized as evidence of non-credible responding. Hierarchical regression revealed that non-dominant hand GPB T-score incrementally predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (<i>F</i>(2,108) = 16.30, <i>p</i> < .001; <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> change = .05, <i>β</i> = -0.24, <i>p</i> < .01). In a second hierarchical regression, GPB performance was dichotomized into pass or fail, using <i>T</i>-score cutoffs (≤29 for either hand, ≤31 for both). Non-dominant hand GPB again predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (<i>F</i>(2,108) = 18.75, <i>p</i> <.001; <i>R<sup>2</sup></i> change = .08, <i>β</i> = -0.28, <i>p</i> < .001). Results indicated that noncredible/failing GPB performance adds incremental value over memory-apparent PVTs in predicting psychiatric symptom report.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51308,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"597-605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2192409\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2192409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究评估了沟槽钉板(GPB)作为一种效能效度测试(PVT),是否可以逐步预测精神症状报告高于记忆明显PVT的升高。参与者(N = 111)是军人,主要是白人(84%),男性(76%),平均年龄为43岁(SD = 12),平均受教育年限为16年(SD = 2)。排除了可能影响运动灵活性的个体。受试者接受GPB、3项记忆表观pts(医学症状效度测试、非言语医学症状效度测试、可靠数字广度)和1项症状效度测试(人格评估量表负面印象管理[NIM])。三个记忆明显pvt的结果被输入到预测NIM的模型中,其中两个或两个以上pvt的失败被归类为不可信反应的证据。层次回归显示,非优势手GPB t评分对NIM的预测高于记忆表观pts (F(2108) = 16.30, p < 0.001;R2变化= 0.05,β = -0.24, p < 0.01)。在第二次分层回归中,使用t分数截止值(任意一方≤29,双方≤31),将GPB表现分为及格或不及格。非优势手GPB再次预测记忆-表观pts以外的NIM (F(2108) = 18.75, p R2变化= 0.08,β = -0.28, p < 0.001)。结果表明,GPB表现不可信/不合格在预测精神症状报告方面比记忆明显pvt增加了增量价值。
Grooved Pegboard adds incremental value over memory-apparent performance validity tests in predicting psychiatric symptom report.
The present study evaluated whether Grooved Pegboard (GPB), when used as a performance validity test (PVT), can incrementally predict psychiatric symptom report elevations beyond memory-apparent PVTs. Participants (N = 111) were military personnel and were predominantly White (84%), male (76%), with a mean age of 43 (SD = 12) and having on average 16 years of education (SD = 2). Individuals with disorders potentially compromising motor dexterity were excluded. Participants were administered GPB, three memory-apparent PVTs (Medical Symptom Validity Test, Non-Verbal Medical Symptom Validity Test, Reliable Digit Span), and a symptom validity test (Personality Assessment Inventory Negative Impression Management [NIM]). Results from the three memory-apparent PVTs were entered into a model for predicting NIM, where failure of two or more PVTs was categorized as evidence of non-credible responding. Hierarchical regression revealed that non-dominant hand GPB T-score incrementally predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (F(2,108) = 16.30, p < .001; R2 change = .05, β = -0.24, p < .01). In a second hierarchical regression, GPB performance was dichotomized into pass or fail, using T-score cutoffs (≤29 for either hand, ≤31 for both). Non-dominant hand GPB again predicted NIM beyond memory-apparent PVTs (F(2,108) = 18.75, p <.001; R2 change = .08, β = -0.28, p < .001). Results indicated that noncredible/failing GPB performance adds incremental value over memory-apparent PVTs in predicting psychiatric symptom report.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.