提高医学文献可及性的写作策略

Pratishtha B Chaudhari, Akshat Banga
{"title":"提高医学文献可及性的写作策略","authors":"Pratishtha B Chaudhari,&nbsp;Akshat Banga","doi":"10.5493/wjem.v13.i3.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When conducting a literature review, medical authors typically search for relevant keywords in bibliographic databases or on search engines like Google. After selecting the most pertinent article based on the title's relevance and the abstract's content, they download or purchase the article and cite it in their manuscript. Three major elements influence whether an article will be cited in future manuscripts: the keywords, the title, and the abstract. This indicates that these elements are the \"key dissemination tools\" for research papers. If these three elements are not determined judiciously by authors, it may adversely affect the manuscript's retrievability, readability, and citation index, which can negatively impact both the author and the journal. In this article, we share our informed perspective on writing strategies to enhance the searchability and citation of medical articles. These strategies are adopted from the principles of search engine optimization, but they do not aim to cheat or manipulate the search engine. Instead, they adopt a reader-centric content writing methodology that targets well-researched keywords to the readers who are searching for them. Reputable journals, such as <i>Nature</i> and the <i>British Medical Journal</i>, emphasize \"online searchability\" in their author guidelines. We hope that this article will encourage medical authors to approach manuscript drafting from the perspective of \"looking inside-out.\" In other words, they should not only draft manuscripts around what they want to convey to fellow researchers but also integrate what the readers want to discover. It is a call-to-action to better understand and engage search engine algorithms, so they yield information in a desired and self-learning manner because the \"Cloud\" is the new stakeholder.</p>","PeriodicalId":75340,"journal":{"name":"World journal of experimental medicine","volume":"13 3","pages":"50-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/fe/WJEM-13-50.PMC10308323.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing strategies for improving the access of medical literature.\",\"authors\":\"Pratishtha B Chaudhari,&nbsp;Akshat Banga\",\"doi\":\"10.5493/wjem.v13.i3.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When conducting a literature review, medical authors typically search for relevant keywords in bibliographic databases or on search engines like Google. After selecting the most pertinent article based on the title's relevance and the abstract's content, they download or purchase the article and cite it in their manuscript. Three major elements influence whether an article will be cited in future manuscripts: the keywords, the title, and the abstract. This indicates that these elements are the \\\"key dissemination tools\\\" for research papers. If these three elements are not determined judiciously by authors, it may adversely affect the manuscript's retrievability, readability, and citation index, which can negatively impact both the author and the journal. In this article, we share our informed perspective on writing strategies to enhance the searchability and citation of medical articles. These strategies are adopted from the principles of search engine optimization, but they do not aim to cheat or manipulate the search engine. Instead, they adopt a reader-centric content writing methodology that targets well-researched keywords to the readers who are searching for them. Reputable journals, such as <i>Nature</i> and the <i>British Medical Journal</i>, emphasize \\\"online searchability\\\" in their author guidelines. We hope that this article will encourage medical authors to approach manuscript drafting from the perspective of \\\"looking inside-out.\\\" In other words, they should not only draft manuscripts around what they want to convey to fellow researchers but also integrate what the readers want to discover. It is a call-to-action to better understand and engage search engine algorithms, so they yield information in a desired and self-learning manner because the \\\"Cloud\\\" is the new stakeholder.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World journal of experimental medicine\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"50-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a6/fe/WJEM-13-50.PMC10308323.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World journal of experimental medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v13.i3.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World journal of experimental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5493/wjem.v13.i3.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在进行文献综述时,医学作者通常会在书目数据库或谷歌等搜索引擎中搜索相关关键词。在根据标题的相关性和摘要的内容选择最相关的文章后,他们下载或购买文章并在手稿中引用它。影响一篇文章是否会在未来的稿件中被引用的主要因素有三个:关键词、标题和摘要。这表明这些要素是研究论文的“关键传播工具”。如果作者没有明智地确定这三个要素,可能会对手稿的可检索性、可读性和引文索引产生不利影响,从而对作者和期刊都产生负面影响。在这篇文章中,我们分享了我们对提高医学文章的可搜索性和引用的写作策略的知情观点。这些策略是从搜索引擎优化的原则中采用的,但它们的目的不是欺骗或操纵搜索引擎。相反,他们采用以读者为中心的内容写作方法,将经过充分研究的关键词定位于正在搜索这些关键词的读者。《自然》和《英国医学杂志》等知名期刊在其作者指南中强调“在线可搜索性”。我们希望这篇文章能鼓励医学作者从“由内而外看”的角度来处理手稿起草。换句话说,他们不仅应该围绕他们想要传达给其他研究人员的内容起草手稿,还应该整合读者想要发现的内容。这是对更好地理解和参与搜索引擎算法的行动呼吁,因此它们以期望和自我学习的方式产生信息,因为“云”是新的利益相关者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Writing strategies for improving the access of medical literature.

Writing strategies for improving the access of medical literature.

Writing strategies for improving the access of medical literature.

When conducting a literature review, medical authors typically search for relevant keywords in bibliographic databases or on search engines like Google. After selecting the most pertinent article based on the title's relevance and the abstract's content, they download or purchase the article and cite it in their manuscript. Three major elements influence whether an article will be cited in future manuscripts: the keywords, the title, and the abstract. This indicates that these elements are the "key dissemination tools" for research papers. If these three elements are not determined judiciously by authors, it may adversely affect the manuscript's retrievability, readability, and citation index, which can negatively impact both the author and the journal. In this article, we share our informed perspective on writing strategies to enhance the searchability and citation of medical articles. These strategies are adopted from the principles of search engine optimization, but they do not aim to cheat or manipulate the search engine. Instead, they adopt a reader-centric content writing methodology that targets well-researched keywords to the readers who are searching for them. Reputable journals, such as Nature and the British Medical Journal, emphasize "online searchability" in their author guidelines. We hope that this article will encourage medical authors to approach manuscript drafting from the perspective of "looking inside-out." In other words, they should not only draft manuscripts around what they want to convey to fellow researchers but also integrate what the readers want to discover. It is a call-to-action to better understand and engage search engine algorithms, so they yield information in a desired and self-learning manner because the "Cloud" is the new stakeholder.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信