内窥镜全乳切除术及即刻腹底自由穿支瓣小切口重建的初步经验及文献回顾。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sabrina Ngaserin, Allen Wei-Jiat Wong, Faith Qi-Hui Leong, Jia-Jun Feng, Yee Onn Kok, Benita Kiat-Tee Tan
{"title":"内窥镜全乳切除术及即刻腹底自由穿支瓣小切口重建的初步经验及文献回顾。","authors":"Sabrina Ngaserin,&nbsp;Allen Wei-Jiat Wong,&nbsp;Faith Qi-Hui Leong,&nbsp;Jia-Jun Feng,&nbsp;Yee Onn Kok,&nbsp;Benita Kiat-Tee Tan","doi":"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoscopic total mastectomy (ETM) is predominantly performed with reconstruction using prostheses, lipofilling, omental flaps, latissimus dorsi flaps, or a combination of these techniques. Common approaches include minimal incisions, e.g., periareolar, inframammary, axillary, or mid-axillary line, which limit the technical ability to perform autologous flap insets and microvascular anastomoses, as such the ETM with free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction has not been robustly explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied female patients with breast cancer who underwent ETM and abdominal-based flap reconstruction. Clinical-radiological-pathological characteristics, surgery, complications, recurrence rates, and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients underwent ETM with abdominal-based flap reconstruction. The mean age was 53.4 years (range 36-65). Of the patients, 33.3% were surgically treated for stage I, 58.4% for stage II, and 8.3% for stage III cancer. Mean tumor size was 35.4 mm (range 1-67). Mean specimen weight was 458.75 g (range 242-800). Of the patients, 92.3% successfully received endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy and 7.7% underwent intraoperative conversion to skin-sparing mastectomy after carcinoma was reported on frozen section of the nipple base. Mean operative time for ETM was 139 minutes (92-198), and the average ischemic time was 37.3 minutes (range 22-50). Fifty percent of patients underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator, 33.4% underwent MS-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), 8.3% underwent MS-1 TRAM, and 8.3% underwent pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction. No cases required re-exploration, no flap failure occurred, margins were clear, and no skin or nipple-areolar complex ischemia/necrosis developed. In the aesthetic outcome evaluation, 16.7% were excellent, 75% good, 8.3% fair, and none were unsatisfactory. No recurrences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETM through a minimal-access inferior mammary or mid-axillary line approach, followed by immediate pedicled TRAM or free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction, can be a safe means of achieving an \"aesthetically scarless\" mastectomy and reconstruction through minimal incisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15206,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Breast Cancer","volume":"26 2","pages":"152-167"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/0f/jbc-26-152.PMC10139846.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Preliminary Experience of Endoscopic Total Mastectomy With Immediate Free Abdominal-Based Perforator Flap Reconstruction Using Minimal Incisions, and Literature Review.\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Ngaserin,&nbsp;Allen Wei-Jiat Wong,&nbsp;Faith Qi-Hui Leong,&nbsp;Jia-Jun Feng,&nbsp;Yee Onn Kok,&nbsp;Benita Kiat-Tee Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Endoscopic total mastectomy (ETM) is predominantly performed with reconstruction using prostheses, lipofilling, omental flaps, latissimus dorsi flaps, or a combination of these techniques. Common approaches include minimal incisions, e.g., periareolar, inframammary, axillary, or mid-axillary line, which limit the technical ability to perform autologous flap insets and microvascular anastomoses, as such the ETM with free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction has not been robustly explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied female patients with breast cancer who underwent ETM and abdominal-based flap reconstruction. Clinical-radiological-pathological characteristics, surgery, complications, recurrence rates, and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients underwent ETM with abdominal-based flap reconstruction. The mean age was 53.4 years (range 36-65). Of the patients, 33.3% were surgically treated for stage I, 58.4% for stage II, and 8.3% for stage III cancer. Mean tumor size was 35.4 mm (range 1-67). Mean specimen weight was 458.75 g (range 242-800). Of the patients, 92.3% successfully received endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy and 7.7% underwent intraoperative conversion to skin-sparing mastectomy after carcinoma was reported on frozen section of the nipple base. Mean operative time for ETM was 139 minutes (92-198), and the average ischemic time was 37.3 minutes (range 22-50). Fifty percent of patients underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator, 33.4% underwent MS-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), 8.3% underwent MS-1 TRAM, and 8.3% underwent pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction. No cases required re-exploration, no flap failure occurred, margins were clear, and no skin or nipple-areolar complex ischemia/necrosis developed. In the aesthetic outcome evaluation, 16.7% were excellent, 75% good, 8.3% fair, and none were unsatisfactory. No recurrences were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ETM through a minimal-access inferior mammary or mid-axillary line approach, followed by immediate pedicled TRAM or free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction, can be a safe means of achieving an \\\"aesthetically scarless\\\" mastectomy and reconstruction through minimal incisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"152-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/64/0f/jbc-26-152.PMC10139846.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Breast Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e10\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:内镜下全乳切除术(ETM)主要采用假体、脂肪填充、大网膜皮瓣、背阔肌皮瓣或这些技术的组合进行重建。常见的入路包括小切口,例如,乳晕周围、乳下、腋窝或腋窝中线,这限制了进行自体皮瓣植入和微血管吻合的技术能力,因此游离腹部穿支皮瓣重建的ETM尚未得到强有力的探索。方法:我们研究了女性乳腺癌患者行ETM和腹部皮瓣重建术。临床-放射-病理特征,手术,并发症,复发率和美学结果进行了回顾。结果:12例患者行腹基皮瓣重建术。平均年龄53.4岁(36-65岁)。在患者中,33.3%的I期患者接受手术治疗,58.4%的II期患者接受手术治疗,8.3%的III期患者接受手术治疗。平均肿瘤大小为35.4 mm(范围1-67)。平均标本重量为458.75 g(范围242-800)。在这些患者中,92.3%的人成功接受了内镜下保留乳头的乳房切除术,7.7%的人在乳头基底冷冻切片上发现癌后,术中转为保留皮肤的乳房切除术。ETM平均手术时间为139分钟(92 ~ 198分钟),平均缺血时间为37.3分钟(22 ~ 50分钟)。50%的患者行上腹部深下穿支,33.4%的患者行MS-2腹横直肌皮肤(TRAM), 8.3%的患者行MS-1 TRAM, 8.3%的患者行带蒂TRAM皮瓣重建。无再次探查,无皮瓣失败,边缘清晰,无皮肤或乳头-乳晕复杂缺血/坏死发生。在审美结果评价中,16.7%为优,75%为良,8.3%为一般,无不满意者。未见复发。结论:经小切口下乳或腋中线入路行ETM,随后立即带蒂TRAM或自由腹基穿支皮瓣重建,可安全实现“美观无疤痕”的乳房切除术和小切口重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Preliminary Experience of Endoscopic Total Mastectomy With Immediate Free Abdominal-Based Perforator Flap Reconstruction Using Minimal Incisions, and Literature Review.

A Preliminary Experience of Endoscopic Total Mastectomy With Immediate Free Abdominal-Based Perforator Flap Reconstruction Using Minimal Incisions, and Literature Review.

A Preliminary Experience of Endoscopic Total Mastectomy With Immediate Free Abdominal-Based Perforator Flap Reconstruction Using Minimal Incisions, and Literature Review.

A Preliminary Experience of Endoscopic Total Mastectomy With Immediate Free Abdominal-Based Perforator Flap Reconstruction Using Minimal Incisions, and Literature Review.

Purpose: Endoscopic total mastectomy (ETM) is predominantly performed with reconstruction using prostheses, lipofilling, omental flaps, latissimus dorsi flaps, or a combination of these techniques. Common approaches include minimal incisions, e.g., periareolar, inframammary, axillary, or mid-axillary line, which limit the technical ability to perform autologous flap insets and microvascular anastomoses, as such the ETM with free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction has not been robustly explored.

Methods: We studied female patients with breast cancer who underwent ETM and abdominal-based flap reconstruction. Clinical-radiological-pathological characteristics, surgery, complications, recurrence rates, and aesthetic outcomes were reviewed.

Results: Twelve patients underwent ETM with abdominal-based flap reconstruction. The mean age was 53.4 years (range 36-65). Of the patients, 33.3% were surgically treated for stage I, 58.4% for stage II, and 8.3% for stage III cancer. Mean tumor size was 35.4 mm (range 1-67). Mean specimen weight was 458.75 g (range 242-800). Of the patients, 92.3% successfully received endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy and 7.7% underwent intraoperative conversion to skin-sparing mastectomy after carcinoma was reported on frozen section of the nipple base. Mean operative time for ETM was 139 minutes (92-198), and the average ischemic time was 37.3 minutes (range 22-50). Fifty percent of patients underwent deep inferior epigastric perforator, 33.4% underwent MS-2 transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), 8.3% underwent MS-1 TRAM, and 8.3% underwent pedicled TRAM flap reconstruction. No cases required re-exploration, no flap failure occurred, margins were clear, and no skin or nipple-areolar complex ischemia/necrosis developed. In the aesthetic outcome evaluation, 16.7% were excellent, 75% good, 8.3% fair, and none were unsatisfactory. No recurrences were observed.

Conclusion: ETM through a minimal-access inferior mammary or mid-axillary line approach, followed by immediate pedicled TRAM or free abdominal-based perforator flap reconstruction, can be a safe means of achieving an "aesthetically scarless" mastectomy and reconstruction through minimal incisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Breast Cancer
Journal of Breast Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Breast Cancer (abbreviated as ''J Breast Cancer'') is the official journal of the Korean Breast Cancer Society, which is issued quarterly in the last day of March, June, September, and December each year since 1998. All the contents of the Journal is available online at the official journal website (http://ejbc.kr) under open access policy. The journal aims to provide a forum for the academic communication between medical doctors, basic science researchers, and health care professionals to be interested in breast cancer. To get this aim, we publish original investigations, review articles, brief communications including case reports, editorial opinions on the topics of importance to breast cancer, and welcome new research findings and epidemiological studies, especially when they contain a regional data to grab the international reader''s interest. Although the journal is mainly dealing with the issues of breast cancer, rare cases among benign breast diseases or evidence-based scientifically written articles providing useful information for clinical practice can be published as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信