抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度在远程提供的精神健康护理中的作用。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychological Services Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-22 DOI:10.1037/ser0000775
Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Winter Johnston, Annette Walder, Jan A Lindsay, Julianna B Hogan
{"title":"抑郁和焦虑症状的严重程度在远程提供的精神健康护理中的作用。","authors":"Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Winter Johnston, Annette Walder, Jan A Lindsay, Julianna B Hogan","doi":"10.1037/ser0000775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined differences in mental health characteristics of Veterans who received VA Video Connect (VVC) or audio-only care during initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort of Veterans with primary diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders (diagnosed between March 2019 and February 2020) was identified, and data were obtained for Veterans who engaged in virtual care from April to December 2020. Two groups were created: Veterans receiving audio-only care (<i>n</i> = 161,071) and Veterans receiving two or more VVC visits (<i>n</i> = 84,505). Multiple logistic regression models examined symptom severity in the year before COVID as a predictor of treatment modality during COVID. Chi-square tests examined associations between modality and the number of assessments. Symptom severity as evaluated by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 significantly predicted modality of encounters during the pandemic such that those who had moderate or severe symptoms prior to COVID-19 were more likely than those with low or no symptoms to have two or more VVC encounters during the pandemic. Of those who received VVC, 55.62% had no Patient Health Questionnaire-9 assessments compared to 68.96% of those who received audio-only. In the VVC group, 70.36% had no Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessments compared to 81.02% in the audio-only group. Taken together, these findings suggest that VVC, when compared to audio-only, was used during the pandemic to reach Veterans with more severe mental health symptomatology and to engage in administration of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20749,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Services","volume":" ","pages":"42-49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10739638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of depression and anxiety symptom severity in remotely delivered mental health care.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony H Ecker, Amber B Amspoker, Winter Johnston, Annette Walder, Jan A Lindsay, Julianna B Hogan\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ser0000775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study examined differences in mental health characteristics of Veterans who received VA Video Connect (VVC) or audio-only care during initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort of Veterans with primary diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders (diagnosed between March 2019 and February 2020) was identified, and data were obtained for Veterans who engaged in virtual care from April to December 2020. Two groups were created: Veterans receiving audio-only care (<i>n</i> = 161,071) and Veterans receiving two or more VVC visits (<i>n</i> = 84,505). Multiple logistic regression models examined symptom severity in the year before COVID as a predictor of treatment modality during COVID. Chi-square tests examined associations between modality and the number of assessments. Symptom severity as evaluated by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 significantly predicted modality of encounters during the pandemic such that those who had moderate or severe symptoms prior to COVID-19 were more likely than those with low or no symptoms to have two or more VVC encounters during the pandemic. Of those who received VVC, 55.62% had no Patient Health Questionnaire-9 assessments compared to 68.96% of those who received audio-only. In the VVC group, 70.36% had no Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessments compared to 81.02% in the audio-only group. Taken together, these findings suggest that VVC, when compared to audio-only, was used during the pandemic to reach Veterans with more severe mental health symptomatology and to engage in administration of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Services\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"42-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10739638/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000775\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Services","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ser0000775","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了在 COVID-19 大流行初期接受退伍军人视频连接(VVC)或纯音频护理的退伍军人在心理健康特征方面的差异。研究人员确定了一组主要诊断为抑郁或焦虑症的退伍军人(诊断时间为 2019 年 3 月至 2020 年 2 月),并获取了 2020 年 4 月至 12 月期间接受虚拟护理的退伍军人的数据。共分为两组:只接受音频护理的退伍军人(n = 161,071 人)和接受两次或两次以上 VVC 访问的退伍军人(n = 84,505 人)。多元逻辑回归模型检验了 COVID 前一年的症状严重程度对 COVID 期间治疗方式的预测作用。卡方检验检验了治疗方式与评估次数之间的关系。通过九项患者健康问卷和广泛性焦虑症-7评估的症状严重程度可显著预测大流行期间的治疗方式,因此在COVID-19之前有中度或严重症状的患者比症状轻微或无症状的患者更有可能在大流行期间接受两次或两次以上的VVC治疗。在接受过 VVC 的人群中,55.62% 的人没有进行过患者健康问卷-9 评估,而在只接受音频治疗的人群中,这一比例为 68.96%。在接受 VVC 的人群中,70.36% 的人没有接受过广泛焦虑症-7 评估,而在只接受音频治疗的人群中,这一比例为 81.02%。综上所述,这些研究结果表明,与纯音频相比,在大流行期间使用 VVC 可帮助退伍军人了解更严重的心理健康症状,并参与基于测量的护理管理。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of depression and anxiety symptom severity in remotely delivered mental health care.

This study examined differences in mental health characteristics of Veterans who received VA Video Connect (VVC) or audio-only care during initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. A cohort of Veterans with primary diagnoses of depressive or anxiety disorders (diagnosed between March 2019 and February 2020) was identified, and data were obtained for Veterans who engaged in virtual care from April to December 2020. Two groups were created: Veterans receiving audio-only care (n = 161,071) and Veterans receiving two or more VVC visits (n = 84,505). Multiple logistic regression models examined symptom severity in the year before COVID as a predictor of treatment modality during COVID. Chi-square tests examined associations between modality and the number of assessments. Symptom severity as evaluated by the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 significantly predicted modality of encounters during the pandemic such that those who had moderate or severe symptoms prior to COVID-19 were more likely than those with low or no symptoms to have two or more VVC encounters during the pandemic. Of those who received VVC, 55.62% had no Patient Health Questionnaire-9 assessments compared to 68.96% of those who received audio-only. In the VVC group, 70.36% had no Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 assessments compared to 81.02% in the audio-only group. Taken together, these findings suggest that VVC, when compared to audio-only, was used during the pandemic to reach Veterans with more severe mental health symptomatology and to engage in administration of measurement-based care. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Services
Psychological Services PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
216
期刊介绍: Psychological Services publishes high-quality data-based articles on the broad range of psychological services. While the Division"s focus is on psychologists in "public service," usually defined as being employed by a governmental agency, Psychological Services covers the full range of psychological services provided in any service delivery setting. Psychological Services encourages submission of papers that focus on broad issues related to psychotherapy outcomes, evaluations of psychological service programs and systems, and public policy analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信