使用耳科规划软件对电极位置进行放射学预测的准确性及高分辨率成像的影响。

IF 1.4 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2023-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-08 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2022.2159128
Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Anja Kurz, Rudolf Hagen, Tilmann Neun, Kristen Rak
{"title":"使用耳科规划软件对电极位置进行放射学预测的准确性及高分辨率成像的影响。","authors":"Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Anja Kurz, Rudolf Hagen, Tilmann Neun, Kristen Rak","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2022.2159128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In cochlear implantation, preoperative prediction of electrode position has recently gained increasing attention. Currently, planning is usually done by multislice CT (MSCT). However, flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) and its secondary reconstructions (fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>) allow for more precise visualization of the cochlea. Combined with a newly developed otological planning software, the position of every single contact can be effectively predicted. In this study it was investigated how accurately radiological prediction forecasts the postoperative electrode localization and whether higher image resolution is advantageous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing otological planning software (OTOPLAN®) and different clinical imaging modalities (MSCT, fpVCT and fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>) the electrode localization [angular insertion depth (AID)] and respective contact frequencies were predicted preoperatively and examined postoperatively. Furthermore, inter-electrode-distance (IED) and inter-electrode-frequency difference (IEFD) were evaluated postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurements revealed a preoperative overestimation of AID. Corresponding frequencies were also miscalculated. Determination of IED and IEFD revealed discrepancies at the transition from the basal to the middle turn and round window to the basal turn. All predictions and discrepancies were lowest when using fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The postoperative electrode position can be predicted quite accurately using otological planning software. However, because of several potential misjudgments, high-resolution imaging, such as offered by fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>, should be used pre- and postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":"24 3","pages":"144-154"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of radiological prediction of electrode position with otological planning software and implications of high-resolution imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Anja Kurz, Rudolf Hagen, Tilmann Neun, Kristen Rak\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14670100.2022.2159128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In cochlear implantation, preoperative prediction of electrode position has recently gained increasing attention. Currently, planning is usually done by multislice CT (MSCT). However, flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) and its secondary reconstructions (fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>) allow for more precise visualization of the cochlea. Combined with a newly developed otological planning software, the position of every single contact can be effectively predicted. In this study it was investigated how accurately radiological prediction forecasts the postoperative electrode localization and whether higher image resolution is advantageous.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing otological planning software (OTOPLAN®) and different clinical imaging modalities (MSCT, fpVCT and fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>) the electrode localization [angular insertion depth (AID)] and respective contact frequencies were predicted preoperatively and examined postoperatively. Furthermore, inter-electrode-distance (IED) and inter-electrode-frequency difference (IEFD) were evaluated postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Measurements revealed a preoperative overestimation of AID. Corresponding frequencies were also miscalculated. Determination of IED and IEFD revealed discrepancies at the transition from the basal to the middle turn and round window to the basal turn. All predictions and discrepancies were lowest when using fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The postoperative electrode position can be predicted quite accurately using otological planning software. However, because of several potential misjudgments, high-resolution imaging, such as offered by fpVCT<sub>SECO</sub>, should be used pre- and postoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":53553,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"volume\":\"24 3\",\"pages\":\"144-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2159128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2022.2159128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在人工耳蜗植入术中,术前预测电极位置最近越来越受到重视。目前,规划通常由多层 CT(MSCT)完成。然而,平板容积 CT(fpVCT)及其二次重建(fpVCTSECO)可以更精确地观察耳蜗。结合新开发的耳科规划软件,可以有效预测每个接触点的位置。本研究调查了放射学预测对术后电极定位的准确性,以及更高的图像分辨率是否具有优势:方法:利用耳科规划软件(OTOPLAN®)和不同的临床成像模式(MSCT、fpVCT 和 fpVCTSECO)在术前预测电极定位[角度插入深度(AID)]和各自的接触频率,并在术后进行检查。此外,术后还评估了电极间距离(IED)和电极间频率差(IEFD):结果:测量结果显示,术前高估了 AID。结果:测量结果显示术前高估了 AID,相应的频率也计算错误。IED 和 IEFD 的测定结果显示,在从基底转到中间转和从圆窗转到基底转的过渡阶段存在差异。使用 fpVCTSECO 时,所有预测和差异都最小:结论:使用耳科规划软件可以相当准确地预测术后电极位置。结论:使用耳科规划软件可以相当准确地预测术后电极位置,但由于可能存在一些误判,因此应在术前和术后使用高分辨率成像,如 fpVCTSECO。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of radiological prediction of electrode position with otological planning software and implications of high-resolution imaging.

Objectives: In cochlear implantation, preoperative prediction of electrode position has recently gained increasing attention. Currently, planning is usually done by multislice CT (MSCT). However, flat-panel volume CT (fpVCT) and its secondary reconstructions (fpVCTSECO) allow for more precise visualization of the cochlea. Combined with a newly developed otological planning software, the position of every single contact can be effectively predicted. In this study it was investigated how accurately radiological prediction forecasts the postoperative electrode localization and whether higher image resolution is advantageous.

Methods: Utilizing otological planning software (OTOPLAN®) and different clinical imaging modalities (MSCT, fpVCT and fpVCTSECO) the electrode localization [angular insertion depth (AID)] and respective contact frequencies were predicted preoperatively and examined postoperatively. Furthermore, inter-electrode-distance (IED) and inter-electrode-frequency difference (IEFD) were evaluated postoperatively.

Results: Measurements revealed a preoperative overestimation of AID. Corresponding frequencies were also miscalculated. Determination of IED and IEFD revealed discrepancies at the transition from the basal to the middle turn and round window to the basal turn. All predictions and discrepancies were lowest when using fpVCTSECO.

Conclusion: The postoperative electrode position can be predicted quite accurately using otological planning software. However, because of several potential misjudgments, high-resolution imaging, such as offered by fpVCTSECO, should be used pre- and postoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信