Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi, Mohammad Amin Behmanesh, Sara Aryannejad, Sima Janati
{"title":"卵裂和囊胚期的新鲜胚胎移植与妊娠结局:一项回顾性横断面研究。","authors":"Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi, Mohammad Amin Behmanesh, Sara Aryannejad, Sima Janati","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>nd</mtext></msup></math> day, 45.8% on the 3<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>rd</mtext></msup></math>, 15.3% on the 4<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>th</mtext></msup></math> day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"21 5","pages":"425-432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Seyedeh Mahsa Poormoosavi, Mohammad Amin Behmanesh, Sara Aryannejad, Sima Janati\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>nd</mtext></msup></math> day, 45.8% on the 3<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>rd</mtext></msup></math>, 15.3% on the 4<math><msup><mrow></mrow><mtext>th</mtext></msup></math> day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p <math><mo>></mo></math> 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"425-432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10285195/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v21i5.13477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Fresh embryo transfer in the cleavage and blastocyst stages and pregnancy outcomes: A retrospective cross-sectional study.
Background: Advances in cell culture media have led to a trend of embryo transfer from the early cleavage stages to blastocyst stage.
Objective: The study aims to compare the effects of fresh embryo transfer in cleavage and blastocyst stage on pregnancy outcomes.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 1422 cases referred to the Umm-al-Banin Infertility Clinic Center, Dezful, Iran, between July 2013 and December 2020 who were candidates for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection for fresh embryo transfer. A total of 1246 cases were divided into 4 categories on days 2-5 or 6. Chemical and clinical pregnancy, abortion, multifetal pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and live birth rates were analyzed.
Results: Fresh embryo transfer was performed in 28.5% of the cases on the 2 day, 45.8% on the 3, 15.3% on the 4 day, and 10.4% on days 5 or 6. The overall clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were estimated at 20.6% and 17.6% in the cleavage, and 17% and 14% in the blastocyst stages, respectively. However, no significant difference was observed in either group. In addition, there was no significant difference between groups in terms of the abortion, multifetal pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (p 0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results, the consequences of pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage were not superior to embryo transfer at different stages of the cleavage process.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.