Alessandro Grandi , Andrea Melloni , Mario D'Oria , Sandro Lepidi , Stefano Bonardelli , Tilo Kölbel , Luca Bertoglio
{"title":"胸腹主动脉瘤急诊血管内治疗方案","authors":"Alessandro Grandi , Andrea Melloni , Mario D'Oria , Sandro Lepidi , Stefano Bonardelli , Tilo Kölbel , Luca Bertoglio","doi":"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51153,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","volume":"36 2","pages":"Pages 174-188"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergent endovascular treatment options for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Grandi , Andrea Melloni , Mario D'Oria , Sandro Lepidi , Stefano Bonardelli , Tilo Kölbel , Luca Bertoglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2023.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Vascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 174-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Vascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796723000224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895796723000224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
长期以来,平行移植、医生改良的内移植物,以及最近的原位开窗术,是治疗胸腹主动脉瘤破裂的唯一血管内选择,结果喜忧参半,主要取决于操作员和中心的经验。由于定制装置已成为选择性胸腹主动脉瘤的血管内治疗选择,因此在紧急情况下它们不是一个可行的选择,因为内移植物的生产可能需要长达4个月的时间。具有标准化配置的现成(OTS)多分支装置的开发允许通过紧急分支血管内手术治疗破裂的胸腹主动脉瘤。Zenith t分支装置(Cook Medical)是美国以外第一个获得CE标志的现成移植物(2012年),也是目前针对这些适应症研究最多的装置。一种新的设备,E-nside胸腹支内假体OTS多支内移植物(Artivion),已经上市,GORE EXCLUDER胸腹支外假体OTS多支内移动物(W.L.GORE and Associates)预计将于2023年发布。由于缺乏关于胸腹主动脉瘤破裂的指南,本综述总结了可用的治疗方案(即平行移植物、医生改良的内移植物、原位开窗术和OTS多分支装置),比较了适应症和禁忌症,并指出了未来十年应填补的证据空白。
Emergent endovascular treatment options for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm
For a long time, parallel grafting, physician-modified endografts, and, more recently, in situ fenestration were the only go-to endovascular options for ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, offered mixed results, and depended mainly on the operator's and center's experience. As custom-made devices have become an established endovascular treatment option for elective thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, they are not a viable option in the emergency setting, as endograft production can take up to 4 months. The development of off-the-shelf (OTS) multibranched devices with a standardized configuration has allowed the treatment of ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm with emergent branched endovascular procedures. The Zenith t-Branch device (Cook Medical) was the first readily available graft outside the United States to receive the CE mark (in 2012) and is currently the most studied device for those indications. A new device, the E-nside thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (Artivion), has been made commercially available, and the GORE EXCLUDER thoracoabdominal branch endoprosthesis OTS multibranched endograft (W. L. Gore and Associates) is expected to be released in 2023. Due to the lack of guidelines on ruptured thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm, this review summarizes the available treatment options (ie, parallel grafts, physician-modified endografts, in situ fenestrations, and OTS multibranched devices), compares the indications and contraindications, and points out the evidence gaps that should be filled in the next decade.
期刊介绍:
Each issue of Seminars in Vascular Surgery examines the latest thinking on a particular clinical problem and features new diagnostic and operative techniques. The journal allows practitioners to expand their capabilities and to keep pace with the most rapidly evolving areas of surgery.