{"title":"领导的谦逊是否助长了员工的私心?考察关系能量的中介作用和工作单元结构的中介作用。","authors":"Jinzhao Qu, Svetlana N Khapova, Shiyong Xu, Wenjing Cai, Ying Zhang, Lihua Zhang, Xinling Jiang","doi":"10.1007/s10869-023-09884-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Prior research has framed bootlegging as employees' unofficial innovation that occurs without organizational authorization or official support. In this paper, we call for bringing leadership back into the study of antecedents of bootlegging and examine the effects of leadership context, specifically leader humility, on employee bootlegging. Following the conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that leader humility can provide valuable endogenous resources, such as relational energy, for employee bootlegging. We also propose that work unit structure (organic versus mechanistic) can serve as a boundary condition in this relationship. We test our hypotheses in (i) a scenario-based experiment, (ii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 212 employees, and (iii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 190 employees embedded in 20 teams. The results show that leader humility positively relates to relational energy, which, in turn, causes employee bootlegging. Furthermore, an organic structure strengthens the relationship between relational energy and bootlegging, and the indirect effect of leader humility on employee bootlegging via relational energy. The paper concludes with a discussion of what these findings suggest for future research and managerial practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149628/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Leader Humility Foster Employee Bootlegging? Examining the Mediating Role of Relational Energy and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure.\",\"authors\":\"Jinzhao Qu, Svetlana N Khapova, Shiyong Xu, Wenjing Cai, Ying Zhang, Lihua Zhang, Xinling Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10869-023-09884-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Prior research has framed bootlegging as employees' unofficial innovation that occurs without organizational authorization or official support. In this paper, we call for bringing leadership back into the study of antecedents of bootlegging and examine the effects of leadership context, specifically leader humility, on employee bootlegging. Following the conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that leader humility can provide valuable endogenous resources, such as relational energy, for employee bootlegging. We also propose that work unit structure (organic versus mechanistic) can serve as a boundary condition in this relationship. We test our hypotheses in (i) a scenario-based experiment, (ii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 212 employees, and (iii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 190 employees embedded in 20 teams. The results show that leader humility positively relates to relational energy, which, in turn, causes employee bootlegging. Furthermore, an organic structure strengthens the relationship between relational energy and bootlegging, and the indirect effect of leader humility on employee bootlegging via relational energy. The paper concludes with a discussion of what these findings suggest for future research and managerial practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10149628/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09884-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-023-09884-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Leader Humility Foster Employee Bootlegging? Examining the Mediating Role of Relational Energy and the Moderating Role of Work Unit Structure.
Prior research has framed bootlegging as employees' unofficial innovation that occurs without organizational authorization or official support. In this paper, we call for bringing leadership back into the study of antecedents of bootlegging and examine the effects of leadership context, specifically leader humility, on employee bootlegging. Following the conservation of resources (COR) theory, we propose that leader humility can provide valuable endogenous resources, such as relational energy, for employee bootlegging. We also propose that work unit structure (organic versus mechanistic) can serve as a boundary condition in this relationship. We test our hypotheses in (i) a scenario-based experiment, (ii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 212 employees, and (iii) a three-wave time-lagged study with a sample of 190 employees embedded in 20 teams. The results show that leader humility positively relates to relational energy, which, in turn, causes employee bootlegging. Furthermore, an organic structure strengthens the relationship between relational energy and bootlegging, and the indirect effect of leader humility on employee bootlegging via relational energy. The paper concludes with a discussion of what these findings suggest for future research and managerial practice.