呼吸防护装置的呼吸工作:方法实施、实验室内、实验室间的可变性和可重复性。

William P King, Margaret Sietsema, Caitlin McClain, Susan Xu, Helion Dhrimaj
{"title":"呼吸防护装置的呼吸工作:方法实施、实验室内、实验室间的可变性和可重复性。","authors":"William P King,&nbsp;Margaret Sietsema,&nbsp;Caitlin McClain,&nbsp;Susan Xu,&nbsp;Helion Dhrimaj","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As part of development of performance standards, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) technical committee, ISO/TC 94/SC 15 Respiratory protective devices (RPD), adopted work of breathing (WOB) to evaluate airflow resistance for all designs (classes) of respiratory protective devices. The interests of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) are to compare the proposed WOB method and results for current RPD with those for present resistance methods. The objectives here were to assemble a method to meet the ISO SC15 standards, validate operation and conformance, and assess repeatability of WOB measurements for RPD. WOB method implementation and use followed standards ISO 16900-5:2016 and ISO 16900-12:2016. Volume-averaged total work of breathing (WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> where V<sub>T</sub> is tidal volume) determined for standard orifices was analyzed for variation and bias. After fabrication and assembly, the method gave preliminary verification orifice results that met ISO requirements and were equivalent to those from other laboratories. Evaluation of additional results from RPD testing showed tidal volume and frequency determined compliance. Appropriate adjustments reduced average absolute bias to 1.7%. Average coefficient of variation for WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> was 2.3%. Over 97% of results obtained during significant use over time met specifications. WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> for as-received air-purifying and supplied-air RPD were repeatable (p<0.05). WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> for unsealed half mask air-purifying RPD was an average of 31% lower compared to sealed. When experimental parameters were appropriately adjusted, the ISO WOB method implemented by NIOSH NPPTL consistently provided ISO-compliant verification WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub>. Results for appropriately sealed RPD were reproducible.</p>","PeriodicalId":73984,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","volume":"34 2","pages":"81-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273392/pdf/nihms-1869188.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability.\",\"authors\":\"William P King,&nbsp;Margaret Sietsema,&nbsp;Caitlin McClain,&nbsp;Susan Xu,&nbsp;Helion Dhrimaj\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>As part of development of performance standards, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) technical committee, ISO/TC 94/SC 15 Respiratory protective devices (RPD), adopted work of breathing (WOB) to evaluate airflow resistance for all designs (classes) of respiratory protective devices. The interests of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) are to compare the proposed WOB method and results for current RPD with those for present resistance methods. The objectives here were to assemble a method to meet the ISO SC15 standards, validate operation and conformance, and assess repeatability of WOB measurements for RPD. WOB method implementation and use followed standards ISO 16900-5:2016 and ISO 16900-12:2016. Volume-averaged total work of breathing (WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> where V<sub>T</sub> is tidal volume) determined for standard orifices was analyzed for variation and bias. After fabrication and assembly, the method gave preliminary verification orifice results that met ISO requirements and were equivalent to those from other laboratories. Evaluation of additional results from RPD testing showed tidal volume and frequency determined compliance. Appropriate adjustments reduced average absolute bias to 1.7%. Average coefficient of variation for WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> was 2.3%. Over 97% of results obtained during significant use over time met specifications. WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> for as-received air-purifying and supplied-air RPD were repeatable (p<0.05). WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub> for unsealed half mask air-purifying RPD was an average of 31% lower compared to sealed. When experimental parameters were appropriately adjusted, the ISO WOB method implemented by NIOSH NPPTL consistently provided ISO-compliant verification WOB<sub>T</sub>/V<sub>T</sub>. Results for appropriately sealed RPD were reproducible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73984,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"81-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273392/pdf/nihms-1869188.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为性能标准制定的一部分,国际标准化组织(ISO)技术委员会ISO/TC 94/SC 15呼吸保护装置(RPD)采用呼吸功(WOB)来评估所有设计(类别)的呼吸保护装置的气流阻力。国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)的国家个人防护技术实验室(NPPTL)的兴趣是比较目前RPD的拟议WOB方法和结果与目前抗性方法的结果。这里的目标是组装一种符合ISO SC15标准的方法,验证操作和一致性,并评估RPD WOB测量的可重复性。WOB方法的实施和使用遵循ISO 16900-5:2016和ISO 16900-12:2016标准。分析标准孔的平均呼吸总功(wot /VT,其中VT为潮气量)的变化和偏差。在制造和组装后,该方法给出了符合ISO要求的初步验证孔结果,并且与其他实验室的结果相当。RPD测试的附加结果评估显示潮汐量和频率决定了依从性。适当的调整将平均绝对偏差降低至1.7%。WOBT/VT的平均变异系数为2.3%。随着时间的推移,在大量使用中获得的结果超过97%符合规范。接收空气净化和供气RPD的WOBT/VT是可重复的(未密封的半面罩空气净化RPD的pT/VT比密封的平均低31%。在适当调整实验参数的情况下,NIOSH NPPTL实施的ISO WOB方法始终能够提供符合ISO标准的验证wot /VT。适当密封的RPD结果重复性好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability.

Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability.

Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability.

Work of Breathing for Respiratory Protective Devices: Method Implementation, Intra-, Inter-Laboratory Variability and Repeatability.

As part of development of performance standards, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) technical committee, ISO/TC 94/SC 15 Respiratory protective devices (RPD), adopted work of breathing (WOB) to evaluate airflow resistance for all designs (classes) of respiratory protective devices. The interests of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) National Personal Protective Technology Laboratory (NPPTL) are to compare the proposed WOB method and results for current RPD with those for present resistance methods. The objectives here were to assemble a method to meet the ISO SC15 standards, validate operation and conformance, and assess repeatability of WOB measurements for RPD. WOB method implementation and use followed standards ISO 16900-5:2016 and ISO 16900-12:2016. Volume-averaged total work of breathing (WOBT/VT where VT is tidal volume) determined for standard orifices was analyzed for variation and bias. After fabrication and assembly, the method gave preliminary verification orifice results that met ISO requirements and were equivalent to those from other laboratories. Evaluation of additional results from RPD testing showed tidal volume and frequency determined compliance. Appropriate adjustments reduced average absolute bias to 1.7%. Average coefficient of variation for WOBT/VT was 2.3%. Over 97% of results obtained during significant use over time met specifications. WOBT/VT for as-received air-purifying and supplied-air RPD were repeatable (p<0.05). WOBT/VT for unsealed half mask air-purifying RPD was an average of 31% lower compared to sealed. When experimental parameters were appropriately adjusted, the ISO WOB method implemented by NIOSH NPPTL consistently provided ISO-compliant verification WOBT/VT. Results for appropriately sealed RPD were reproducible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信