用不同方法打开微量离心管时的飞溅率。

IF 0.5 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Applied Biosafety Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-05 DOI:10.1089/apb.2022.0035
Henry L Wyneken, Audrey A Cerles, Kelly N Kim, Christine Heren, Emma J Reuter, Colin McCarty, Kaylin Chen, Sean Daly, Lauren Gherman, Iqra Imran, Alannah Miller, Caitlin Wrinn, Andrea Valladares, Adam E J Fleming, Rebecca Roberts, Rocco Casagrande
{"title":"用不同方法打开微量离心管时的飞溅率。","authors":"Henry L Wyneken, Audrey A Cerles, Kelly N Kim, Christine Heren, Emma J Reuter, Colin McCarty, Kaylin Chen, Sean Daly, Lauren Gherman, Iqra Imran, Alannah Miller, Caitlin Wrinn, Andrea Valladares, Adam E J Fleming, Rebecca Roberts, Rocco Casagrande","doi":"10.1089/apb.2022.0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Snap-cap microcentrifuge tubes are ubiquitous in biological laboratories. However, limited data are available on how frequently splashes occur when opening them. These data would be valuable for biorisk management in the laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frequency of splashes from opening snap-cap tubes using four different methods was tested. The splash frequency for each method was measured on the benchtop surface and on the experimenter's gloves and smock, using a Glo Germ solution as a tracer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Splashes occurred very frequently when opening microcentrifuge snap-cap tubes, no matter which method was used to open the tube. The highest rate of splashes on all surfaces was observed with the one-handed (OH) opening method compared with two-handed methods. Across all methods, the highest rate of splashes was observed on the opener's gloves (70-97%) compared with the benchtop (2-40%) or the body of the researcher (0-7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All tube opening methods we studied frequently caused splashes, with the OH method being the most error-prone but no two-handed method being clearly superior to any other. In addition to posing an exposure risk to laboratory personnel, experimental repeatability may be affected due to loss of volume when using snap-cap tubes. The rate of splashes underscores the importance of secondary containment, personal protective equipment, and good protocols for decontamination. When working with especially hazardous materials, alternatives to snap-cap tubes (such as screw cap tubes) should be strongly considered. Future studies can examine other methods of opening snap-cap tubes to determine whether a truly safe method exists.</p>","PeriodicalId":7962,"journal":{"name":"Applied Biosafety","volume":"28 2","pages":"123-129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278008/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate of Splashes When Opening Microfuge Tubes with Various Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Henry L Wyneken, Audrey A Cerles, Kelly N Kim, Christine Heren, Emma J Reuter, Colin McCarty, Kaylin Chen, Sean Daly, Lauren Gherman, Iqra Imran, Alannah Miller, Caitlin Wrinn, Andrea Valladares, Adam E J Fleming, Rebecca Roberts, Rocco Casagrande\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/apb.2022.0035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Snap-cap microcentrifuge tubes are ubiquitous in biological laboratories. However, limited data are available on how frequently splashes occur when opening them. These data would be valuable for biorisk management in the laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The frequency of splashes from opening snap-cap tubes using four different methods was tested. The splash frequency for each method was measured on the benchtop surface and on the experimenter's gloves and smock, using a Glo Germ solution as a tracer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Splashes occurred very frequently when opening microcentrifuge snap-cap tubes, no matter which method was used to open the tube. The highest rate of splashes on all surfaces was observed with the one-handed (OH) opening method compared with two-handed methods. Across all methods, the highest rate of splashes was observed on the opener's gloves (70-97%) compared with the benchtop (2-40%) or the body of the researcher (0-7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All tube opening methods we studied frequently caused splashes, with the OH method being the most error-prone but no two-handed method being clearly superior to any other. In addition to posing an exposure risk to laboratory personnel, experimental repeatability may be affected due to loss of volume when using snap-cap tubes. The rate of splashes underscores the importance of secondary containment, personal protective equipment, and good protocols for decontamination. When working with especially hazardous materials, alternatives to snap-cap tubes (such as screw cap tubes) should be strongly considered. Future studies can examine other methods of opening snap-cap tubes to determine whether a truly safe method exists.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"volume\":\"28 2\",\"pages\":\"123-129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10278008/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Biosafety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Biosafety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介扣盖式微离心管在生物实验室中无处不在。然而,关于打开微离心管时发生飞溅的频率的数据却很有限。这些数据对实验室的生物风险管理很有价值:方法:测试了使用四种不同方法打开快盖试管时发生飞溅的频率。使用 Glo Germ 溶液作为示踪剂,测量了每种方法在台面、实验者手套和工作服上的飞溅频率:结果:无论使用哪种方法打开微离心管,在打开微离心管时都会频繁发生飞溅。与双手打开方式相比,单手(OH)打开方式在所有表面上的飞溅率最高。在所有方法中,与台面(2-40%)或研究人员身体(0-7%)相比,开瓶器手套上的飞溅率最高(70-97%):结论:我们研究的所有试管开启方法都经常造成飞溅,其中 OH 方法最容易出错,但没有一种双手开启方法明显优于其他方法。除了会给实验室人员带来暴露风险外,使用快盖试管时由于体积损失可能会影响实验的可重复性。飞溅率凸显了二次封闭、个人防护设备和良好的净化规程的重要性。在处理特别危险的材料时,应积极考虑使用快盖试管的替代品(如螺旋盖试管)。未来的研究可以检查打开快盖试管的其他方法,以确定是否存在真正安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rate of Splashes When Opening Microfuge Tubes with Various Methods.

Introduction: Snap-cap microcentrifuge tubes are ubiquitous in biological laboratories. However, limited data are available on how frequently splashes occur when opening them. These data would be valuable for biorisk management in the laboratory.

Methods: The frequency of splashes from opening snap-cap tubes using four different methods was tested. The splash frequency for each method was measured on the benchtop surface and on the experimenter's gloves and smock, using a Glo Germ solution as a tracer.

Results: Splashes occurred very frequently when opening microcentrifuge snap-cap tubes, no matter which method was used to open the tube. The highest rate of splashes on all surfaces was observed with the one-handed (OH) opening method compared with two-handed methods. Across all methods, the highest rate of splashes was observed on the opener's gloves (70-97%) compared with the benchtop (2-40%) or the body of the researcher (0-7%).

Conclusions: All tube opening methods we studied frequently caused splashes, with the OH method being the most error-prone but no two-handed method being clearly superior to any other. In addition to posing an exposure risk to laboratory personnel, experimental repeatability may be affected due to loss of volume when using snap-cap tubes. The rate of splashes underscores the importance of secondary containment, personal protective equipment, and good protocols for decontamination. When working with especially hazardous materials, alternatives to snap-cap tubes (such as screw cap tubes) should be strongly considered. Future studies can examine other methods of opening snap-cap tubes to determine whether a truly safe method exists.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Biosafety
Applied Biosafety Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
13.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Applied Biosafety (APB), sponsored by ABSA International, is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal committed to promoting global biosafety awareness and best practices to prevent occupational exposures and adverse environmental impacts related to biohazardous releases. APB provides a forum for exchanging sound biosafety and biosecurity initiatives by publishing original articles, review articles, letters to the editors, commentaries, and brief reviews. APB informs scientists, safety professionals, policymakers, engineers, architects, and governmental organizations. The journal is committed to publishing on topics significant in well-resourced countries as well as information relevant to underserved regions, engaging and cultivating the development of biosafety professionals globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信