Mabel Toribio, Madeline Cetlin, Evelynne S Fulda, Sarah M Chu, Jorge Gómez Tejeda Zañudo, Tonia Poteat, Karen Donelan, Markella V Zanni
{"title":"为变性人提供护理的临床医生的激素处方和 HIV 筛查/预防做法。","authors":"Mabel Toribio, Madeline Cetlin, Evelynne S Fulda, Sarah M Chu, Jorge Gómez Tejeda Zañudo, Tonia Poteat, Karen Donelan, Markella V Zanni","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2021.0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Through a survey-based approach, we sought to investigate regional differences in gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescribing practices, as well as HIV screening and prevention practices among clinicians providing care to transgender individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our survey was disseminated between December 2019 and January 2021 to clinicians who prescribe GAHT within New England (United States). Between-group differences in GAHT prescribing and HIV screening/prevention practices were evaluated by practice setting and subspecialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 survey respondents, 55% practiced in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, 45% practiced in a community-based health care setting, and 30% were Endocrinologists. Clinicians in community-based health care settings reported more frequently prescribing oral 17β-estradiol (<i>p</i>=0.02) and spironolactone (<i>p</i>=0.007) for feminizing GAHT compared with clinicians in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, who reported more frequently prescribing leuprolide (<i>p</i>=0.03). For masculinizing GAHT, clinicians from health care settings affiliated with an academic institution reported more frequently prescribing topical testosterone (<i>p</i>=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in reported barriers to initiation or reasons for stopping GAHT. While non-Endocrinologists reported \"often\" or \"always\" offering HIV screening, most Endocrinologists reported \"rarely\" or \"never\" offering HIV screening and \"rarely\" or \"never\" offering pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis to their transgender patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional GAHT prescribing practices varied by setting. Additional research is needed to better understand whether these differences translate to differences in GAHT efficacy and side-effects. Further, HIV screening/prevention practices varied by subspecialty. Integrated GAHT and HIV screening/prevention across subspecialties could help reduce the disproportionate burden of HIV faced by the transgender community.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":"8 1","pages":"64-73"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hormone Prescription and HIV Screening/Preventive Practices Among Clinicians Providing Care for Transgender Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Mabel Toribio, Madeline Cetlin, Evelynne S Fulda, Sarah M Chu, Jorge Gómez Tejeda Zañudo, Tonia Poteat, Karen Donelan, Markella V Zanni\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/trgh.2021.0118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Through a survey-based approach, we sought to investigate regional differences in gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescribing practices, as well as HIV screening and prevention practices among clinicians providing care to transgender individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our survey was disseminated between December 2019 and January 2021 to clinicians who prescribe GAHT within New England (United States). Between-group differences in GAHT prescribing and HIV screening/prevention practices were evaluated by practice setting and subspecialty.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 20 survey respondents, 55% practiced in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, 45% practiced in a community-based health care setting, and 30% were Endocrinologists. Clinicians in community-based health care settings reported more frequently prescribing oral 17β-estradiol (<i>p</i>=0.02) and spironolactone (<i>p</i>=0.007) for feminizing GAHT compared with clinicians in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, who reported more frequently prescribing leuprolide (<i>p</i>=0.03). For masculinizing GAHT, clinicians from health care settings affiliated with an academic institution reported more frequently prescribing topical testosterone (<i>p</i>=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in reported barriers to initiation or reasons for stopping GAHT. While non-Endocrinologists reported \\\"often\\\" or \\\"always\\\" offering HIV screening, most Endocrinologists reported \\\"rarely\\\" or \\\"never\\\" offering HIV screening and \\\"rarely\\\" or \\\"never\\\" offering pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis to their transgender patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regional GAHT prescribing practices varied by setting. Additional research is needed to better understand whether these differences translate to differences in GAHT efficacy and side-effects. Further, HIV screening/prevention practices varied by subspecialty. Integrated GAHT and HIV screening/prevention across subspecialties could help reduce the disproportionate burden of HIV faced by the transgender community.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transgender Health\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"64-73\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9942173/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transgender Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2021.0118\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2021.0118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过基于调查的方法,我们试图调查为变性人提供护理的临床医生在性别确认激素疗法(GAHT)处方实践以及 HIV 筛查和预防实践方面的地区差异:我们的调查于 2019 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月期间在美国新英格兰地区向开具 GAHT 处方的临床医生发放。根据执业环境和亚专科评估了开具 GAHT 处方和 HIV 筛查/预防做法的组间差异:在 20 名调查对象中,55% 在学术机构下属的医疗机构执业,45% 在社区医疗机构执业,30% 是内分泌科医生。与学术机构附属医疗机构的临床医生相比,社区医疗机构的临床医生更常为女性化 GAHT 开具口服 17β-estradiol (p=0.02)和螺内酯(p=0.007)处方,而学术机构附属医疗机构的临床医生则更常开具亮丙瑞林(p=0.03)处方。对于男性化 GAHT,学术机构下属医疗机构的临床医生更常开具局部睾酮处方(p=0.03)。在报告的启动障碍或停止 GAHT 的原因方面,组间差异并不明显。虽然非内分泌科医生表示 "经常 "或 "总是 "提供 HIV 筛查,但大多数内分泌科医生表示 "很少 "或 "从未 "提供 HIV 筛查,并且 "很少 "或 "从未 "向其变性患者提供暴露前或暴露后预防:不同地区的 GAHT 处方做法各不相同。为了更好地了解这些差异是否会转化为 GAHT 疗效和副作用的差异,还需要进行更多的研究。此外,不同亚专科的艾滋病筛查/预防方法也不尽相同。跨亚专科的综合 GAHT 和 HIV 筛查/预防有助于减轻变性人群体面临的不成比例的 HIV 负担。
Hormone Prescription and HIV Screening/Preventive Practices Among Clinicians Providing Care for Transgender Individuals.
Purpose: Through a survey-based approach, we sought to investigate regional differences in gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) prescribing practices, as well as HIV screening and prevention practices among clinicians providing care to transgender individuals.
Methods: Our survey was disseminated between December 2019 and January 2021 to clinicians who prescribe GAHT within New England (United States). Between-group differences in GAHT prescribing and HIV screening/prevention practices were evaluated by practice setting and subspecialty.
Results: Of the 20 survey respondents, 55% practiced in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, 45% practiced in a community-based health care setting, and 30% were Endocrinologists. Clinicians in community-based health care settings reported more frequently prescribing oral 17β-estradiol (p=0.02) and spironolactone (p=0.007) for feminizing GAHT compared with clinicians in health care settings affiliated with an academic institution, who reported more frequently prescribing leuprolide (p=0.03). For masculinizing GAHT, clinicians from health care settings affiliated with an academic institution reported more frequently prescribing topical testosterone (p=0.03). There were no significant between-group differences in reported barriers to initiation or reasons for stopping GAHT. While non-Endocrinologists reported "often" or "always" offering HIV screening, most Endocrinologists reported "rarely" or "never" offering HIV screening and "rarely" or "never" offering pre-exposure or postexposure prophylaxis to their transgender patients.
Conclusions: Regional GAHT prescribing practices varied by setting. Additional research is needed to better understand whether these differences translate to differences in GAHT efficacy and side-effects. Further, HIV screening/prevention practices varied by subspecialty. Integrated GAHT and HIV screening/prevention across subspecialties could help reduce the disproportionate burden of HIV faced by the transgender community.