预防性牙科服务对医疗补助儿童后续牙科治疗的影响。

IF 2.2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
T H Brickhouse, J Yu, A M Kumar, B Dahman
{"title":"预防性牙科服务对医疗补助儿童后续牙科治疗的影响。","authors":"T H Brickhouse,&nbsp;J Yu,&nbsp;A M Kumar,&nbsp;B Dahman","doi":"10.1177/23800844221096317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The goal of this study was to use claims data linked with community-level measures to evaluate the impact of preventive services on the time to subsequent restorative, advanced restorative, and complex dental treatment among children enrolled in the Virginia Medicaid program. Methods: Four data sources were used (dental claims, eligibility files, American Community Survey, and Area Health Resource Files) for fiscal years 2011 to 2018. The outcomes of interest were time to first treatment services from birth. The treatment outcomes were basic restorative treatment, advanced restorative treatment, or complex treatment. The independent variable was a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Time-to-event curves were estimated and compared using a log-rank test. Propensity score–matched univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards frailty models with an inverse probability censoring weighting correction estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment outcomes comparing use of preventive services while controlling for patient demographic, geospatial, and county-level socioeconomic status measures. Results: The analysis included 430,594 children (10,204,182 claims). A log-rank test showed significant differences (P < 0.001) between the times to treatment of those who had a preventive service and those who did not have a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Both Kaplan–Meier curves and the adjusted HR (1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–2.15) indicated that children without preventive services were more likely to have basic restorative treatment at an earlier age along with advanced restorative treatment (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28–1.80) and complex treatment (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.68–2.61). Conclusions: In a population of Medicaid-enrolled children, children who did not receive preventive services were significantly more likely to have treatment at an earlier age than those who did receive preventive services. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study examines the impact of the utilization of preventive dental services since birth and the subsequent dental treatment for children enrolled in a dental Medicaid program. This study also examines the influence of preventive care on dental complexity of treatment for these children. Findings can inform federal and state policy planning of dental Medicaid programs as well as interventions to improve referral systems for the early use of preventive dental services and the establishment of a dental home.","PeriodicalId":14783,"journal":{"name":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286182/pdf/10.1177_23800844221096317.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Preventive Dental Services on Subsequent Dental Treatment for Children in Medicaid.\",\"authors\":\"T H Brickhouse,&nbsp;J Yu,&nbsp;A M Kumar,&nbsp;B Dahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23800844221096317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The goal of this study was to use claims data linked with community-level measures to evaluate the impact of preventive services on the time to subsequent restorative, advanced restorative, and complex dental treatment among children enrolled in the Virginia Medicaid program. Methods: Four data sources were used (dental claims, eligibility files, American Community Survey, and Area Health Resource Files) for fiscal years 2011 to 2018. The outcomes of interest were time to first treatment services from birth. The treatment outcomes were basic restorative treatment, advanced restorative treatment, or complex treatment. The independent variable was a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Time-to-event curves were estimated and compared using a log-rank test. Propensity score–matched univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards frailty models with an inverse probability censoring weighting correction estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment outcomes comparing use of preventive services while controlling for patient demographic, geospatial, and county-level socioeconomic status measures. Results: The analysis included 430,594 children (10,204,182 claims). A log-rank test showed significant differences (P < 0.001) between the times to treatment of those who had a preventive service and those who did not have a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Both Kaplan–Meier curves and the adjusted HR (1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–2.15) indicated that children without preventive services were more likely to have basic restorative treatment at an earlier age along with advanced restorative treatment (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28–1.80) and complex treatment (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.68–2.61). Conclusions: In a population of Medicaid-enrolled children, children who did not receive preventive services were significantly more likely to have treatment at an earlier age than those who did receive preventive services. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study examines the impact of the utilization of preventive dental services since birth and the subsequent dental treatment for children enrolled in a dental Medicaid program. This study also examines the influence of preventive care on dental complexity of treatment for these children. Findings can inform federal and state policy planning of dental Medicaid programs as well as interventions to improve referral systems for the early use of preventive dental services and the establishment of a dental home.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JDR Clinical & Translational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10286182/pdf/10.1177_23800844221096317.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JDR Clinical & Translational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221096317\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JDR Clinical & Translational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23800844221096317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是使用与社区水平措施相关联的索赔数据来评估预防性服务对弗吉尼亚医疗补助计划注册儿童后续修复、高级修复和复杂牙科治疗时间的影响。方法:使用2011 - 2018财政年度的四个数据来源(牙科索赔、资格文件、美国社区调查和地区卫生资源文件)。关注的结果是从出生到第一次治疗服务的时间。治疗结果分为基础修复治疗、高级修复治疗和综合修复治疗。自变量是预防性服务先于治疗服务。使用log-rank检验估计和比较时间-事件曲线。倾向得分匹配单变量和多变量Cox比例风险脆弱性模型,采用逆概率审查加权校正,在控制患者人口统计学、地理空间和县级社会经济地位措施的同时,比较预防服务使用的治疗结果估计风险比(hr)。结果:分析包括430,594名儿童(10,204,182名索赔)。log-rank检验显示,接受预防性服务的患者和未接受预防性服务的患者在接受治疗前的治疗时间有显著差异(P < 0.001)。Kaplan-Meier曲线和调整后的HR (1.88;95%可信区间[CI], 1.46-2.15)表明,没有预防性服务的儿童更有可能在更早的年龄接受基本恢复性治疗和高级恢复性治疗(HR, 1.52;95% CI, 1.28-1.80)和复合治疗(HR, 2.13;95% ci, 1.68-2.61)。结论:在参加医疗补助的儿童人群中,未接受预防服务的儿童比接受预防服务的儿童更有可能在更早的年龄接受治疗。知识转移声明:本研究考察了自出生以来预防性牙科服务的利用以及随后参加牙科医疗补助计划的儿童的牙科治疗的影响。本研究亦探讨预防护理对这些儿童牙科治疗复杂性的影响。研究结果可以为联邦和州牙科医疗补助计划的政策规划以及干预措施提供信息,以改善早期使用预防性牙科服务的转诊系统,并建立牙科之家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Preventive Dental Services on Subsequent Dental Treatment for Children in Medicaid.
Objective: The goal of this study was to use claims data linked with community-level measures to evaluate the impact of preventive services on the time to subsequent restorative, advanced restorative, and complex dental treatment among children enrolled in the Virginia Medicaid program. Methods: Four data sources were used (dental claims, eligibility files, American Community Survey, and Area Health Resource Files) for fiscal years 2011 to 2018. The outcomes of interest were time to first treatment services from birth. The treatment outcomes were basic restorative treatment, advanced restorative treatment, or complex treatment. The independent variable was a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Time-to-event curves were estimated and compared using a log-rank test. Propensity score–matched univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards frailty models with an inverse probability censoring weighting correction estimated hazard ratios (HRs) for treatment outcomes comparing use of preventive services while controlling for patient demographic, geospatial, and county-level socioeconomic status measures. Results: The analysis included 430,594 children (10,204,182 claims). A log-rank test showed significant differences (P < 0.001) between the times to treatment of those who had a preventive service and those who did not have a preventive service prior to a treatment service. Both Kaplan–Meier curves and the adjusted HR (1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46–2.15) indicated that children without preventive services were more likely to have basic restorative treatment at an earlier age along with advanced restorative treatment (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.28–1.80) and complex treatment (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.68–2.61). Conclusions: In a population of Medicaid-enrolled children, children who did not receive preventive services were significantly more likely to have treatment at an earlier age than those who did receive preventive services. Knowledge Transfer Statement: This study examines the impact of the utilization of preventive dental services since birth and the subsequent dental treatment for children enrolled in a dental Medicaid program. This study also examines the influence of preventive care on dental complexity of treatment for these children. Findings can inform federal and state policy planning of dental Medicaid programs as well as interventions to improve referral systems for the early use of preventive dental services and the establishment of a dental home.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JDR Clinical & Translational Research
JDR Clinical & Translational Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: JDR Clinical & Translational Research seeks to publish the highest quality research articles on clinical and translational research including all of the dental specialties and implantology. Examples include behavioral sciences, cariology, oral & pharyngeal cancer, disease diagnostics, evidence based health care delivery, human genetics, health services research, periodontal diseases, oral medicine, radiology, and pathology. The JDR Clinical & Translational Research expands on its research content by including high-impact health care and global oral health policy statements and systematic reviews of clinical concepts affecting clinical practice. Unique to the JDR Clinical & Translational Research are advances in clinical and translational medicine articles created to focus on research with an immediate potential to affect clinical therapy outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信