急性呼吸窘迫综合征的氧合靶点

Gilles Capellier , Loic Barrot , Hadrien Winizewski
{"title":"急性呼吸窘迫综合征的氧合靶点","authors":"Gilles Capellier ,&nbsp;Loic Barrot ,&nbsp;Hadrien Winizewski","doi":"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Determining oxygenation targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenge. Although oxygenation targets have been used since ARDS was first described, they have not been investigated in detail. However, recent retrospective and prospective trials have evaluated the optimal oxygenation threshold in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit. In view of the lack of prospective data, clinicians continue to rely on data from the few available trials to identify the optimal oxygenation strategy. Assessment of the cost-benefit ratio of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) to the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO<sub>2</sub>) is an additional challenge. A high FiO<sub>2</sub> has been found to be responsible for respiratory failure and deaths in numerous animal models. Low and high PaO<sub>2</sub> values have also been demonstrated to be potential risk factors in experimental and clinical situations. The findings from this literature review suggest that PaO<sub>2</sub> values ranging between 80 mmHg and 90 mmHg are acceptable in patients with ARDS. The costs of rescue maneuvers needed to reach these targets have been discussed. Several recent papers have highlighted the risk of disagreement between arterial oxygen saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) values. In order to avoid discrepancies and hidden hypoxemia, SpO<sub>2</sub> readings need to be compared with those of SaO<sub>2</sub>. Higher SpO<sub>2</sub> values may be needed to achieve the recommended PaO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> values.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73799,"journal":{"name":"Journal of intensive medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/8b/main.PMC10181914.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oxygenation target in acute respiratory distress syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Capellier ,&nbsp;Loic Barrot ,&nbsp;Hadrien Winizewski\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jointm.2023.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Determining oxygenation targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenge. Although oxygenation targets have been used since ARDS was first described, they have not been investigated in detail. However, recent retrospective and prospective trials have evaluated the optimal oxygenation threshold in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit. In view of the lack of prospective data, clinicians continue to rely on data from the few available trials to identify the optimal oxygenation strategy. Assessment of the cost-benefit ratio of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) to the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO<sub>2</sub>) is an additional challenge. A high FiO<sub>2</sub> has been found to be responsible for respiratory failure and deaths in numerous animal models. Low and high PaO<sub>2</sub> values have also been demonstrated to be potential risk factors in experimental and clinical situations. The findings from this literature review suggest that PaO<sub>2</sub> values ranging between 80 mmHg and 90 mmHg are acceptable in patients with ARDS. The costs of rescue maneuvers needed to reach these targets have been discussed. Several recent papers have highlighted the risk of disagreement between arterial oxygen saturation (SaO<sub>2</sub>) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) values. In order to avoid discrepancies and hidden hypoxemia, SpO<sub>2</sub> readings need to be compared with those of SaO<sub>2</sub>. Higher SpO<sub>2</sub> values may be needed to achieve the recommended PaO<sub>2</sub> and SaO<sub>2</sub> values.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/29/8b/main.PMC10181914.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of intensive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of intensive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667100X23000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

确定急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的氧合靶点仍然是一个挑战。尽管自首次描述ARDS以来就使用了氧合靶点,但尚未对其进行详细研究。然而,最近的回顾性和前瞻性试验已经评估了入住普通重症监护室的患者的最佳氧合阈值。鉴于缺乏前瞻性数据,临床医生继续依赖少数可用试验的数据来确定最佳氧合策略。评估吸入氧气(FiO2)分数与动脉血中氧气分压(PaO2)的成本效益比是一个额外的挑战。在许多动物模型中,高FiO2被发现是导致呼吸衰竭和死亡的原因。在实验和临床情况下,低和高PaO2值也被证明是潜在的风险因素。这篇文献综述的结果表明,在ARDS患者中,80毫米汞柱至90毫米汞柱之间的PaO2值是可以接受的。已经讨论了达到这些目标所需的救援演习的成本。最近的几篇论文强调了动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)和外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)值之间存在差异的风险。为了避免差异和隐性低氧血症,SpO2读数需要与SaO2读数进行比较。可能需要更高的SpO2值来实现推荐的PaO2和SaO2值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Oxygenation target in acute respiratory distress syndrome

Determining oxygenation targets in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a challenge. Although oxygenation targets have been used since ARDS was first described, they have not been investigated in detail. However, recent retrospective and prospective trials have evaluated the optimal oxygenation threshold in patients admitted to the general intensive care unit. In view of the lack of prospective data, clinicians continue to rely on data from the few available trials to identify the optimal oxygenation strategy. Assessment of the cost-benefit ratio of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) to the partial pressure of oxygen in the arterial blood (PaO2) is an additional challenge. A high FiO2 has been found to be responsible for respiratory failure and deaths in numerous animal models. Low and high PaO2 values have also been demonstrated to be potential risk factors in experimental and clinical situations. The findings from this literature review suggest that PaO2 values ranging between 80 mmHg and 90 mmHg are acceptable in patients with ARDS. The costs of rescue maneuvers needed to reach these targets have been discussed. Several recent papers have highlighted the risk of disagreement between arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) values. In order to avoid discrepancies and hidden hypoxemia, SpO2 readings need to be compared with those of SaO2. Higher SpO2 values may be needed to achieve the recommended PaO2 and SaO2 values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of intensive medicine
Journal of intensive medicine Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
58 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信