iGen还是shyGen?羞怯的代际差异。

IF 4.8 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Louis A Schmidt, Christina A Brook, Raha Hassan, Taigan MacGowan, Kristie L Poole, Michelle K Jetha
{"title":"iGen还是shyGen?羞怯的代际差异。","authors":"Louis A Schmidt,&nbsp;Christina A Brook,&nbsp;Raha Hassan,&nbsp;Taigan MacGowan,&nbsp;Kristie L Poole,&nbsp;Michelle K Jetha","doi":"10.1177/09567976231163877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (<i>N</i> = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; <i>n</i> = 266, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into <i>prepandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 263, <i>M</i> = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and <i>midpandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 277, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.</p>","PeriodicalId":20745,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Science","volume":"34 6","pages":"705-713"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"iGen or <i>shy</i>Gen? Generational Differences in Shyness.\",\"authors\":\"Louis A Schmidt,&nbsp;Christina A Brook,&nbsp;Raha Hassan,&nbsp;Taigan MacGowan,&nbsp;Kristie L Poole,&nbsp;Michelle K Jetha\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09567976231163877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (<i>N</i> = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; <i>n</i> = 266, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into <i>prepandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 263, <i>M</i> = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and <i>midpandemic</i> (<i>n</i> = 277, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Science\",\"volume\":\"34 6\",\"pages\":\"705-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231163877\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231163877","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Z世代(1997-2012)在大众媒体上被描述为比前几代人在社交上更克制、更谨慎、更厌恶风险,但这些代际差异是在经验层面上发现的吗?如果是这样,在应对COVID-19大流行等急性事件时,这些差异在几代人之间是否可以观察到?采用简化的时间滞后设计来控制年龄的影响,我们检验了千禧一代(1999-2001;n = 266,法师= 19.67岁,女性占72.9%)和Z世代(检测时间:2018-2020年),后者分为流行前组(n = 263, M = 18.86岁,女性占82.4%)和流行中期组(n = 277,法师= 18.67岁,女性占79.6%)。在首先建立测量不变性以确保可信的群体比较之后,我们发现,从千禧一代开始,到大流行前的Z世代,再到大流行期间的Z世代,每个连续的队列中羞怯的平均水平都明显更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
iGen or shyGen? Generational Differences in Shyness.

Generation Z (1997-2012) has been characterized in the popular media as more socially inhibited, cautious, and risk averse than prior generations, but are these differences found between generations on an empirical level? And, if so, are these differences observable within generations in response to acute events such as the COVID-19 pandemic? Using a simplified time-lagged design to control for age effects, we examined between-group differences in self-reported shyness in young adult participants (N = 806, age: 17-25 years) at the same developmental age and university from the millennial generation (tested: 1999-2001; n = 266, Mage = 19.67 years, 72.9% female) and Generation Z (tested: 2018-2020), the latter generation stratified into prepandemic (n = 263, M = 18.86 years, 82.4% female) and midpandemic (n = 277, Mage = 18.67 years, 79.6% female) groups. After first establishing measurement invariance to ensure trustworthy group comparisons, we found significantly higher mean levels of shyness across each successive cohort, starting with millennials, through Generation Z before the pandemic, to Generation Z during the pandemic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Science
Psychological Science PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
156
期刊介绍: Psychological Science, the flagship journal of The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society), is a leading publication in the field with a citation ranking/impact factor among the top ten worldwide. It publishes authoritative articles covering various domains of psychological science, including brain and behavior, clinical science, cognition, learning and memory, social psychology, and developmental psychology. In addition to full-length articles, the journal features summaries of new research developments and discussions on psychological issues in government and public affairs. "Psychological Science" is published twelve times annually.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信