成本对非转移性肢体肉瘤手术治疗质量的影响:一项采用系统方法的跨国叙事文献综述。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Timothy Kuek, Chris G Schilling, Peter F Choong
{"title":"成本对非转移性肢体肉瘤手术治疗质量的影响:一项采用系统方法的跨国叙事文献综述。","authors":"Timothy Kuek,&nbsp;Chris G Schilling,&nbsp;Peter F Choong","doi":"10.1177/10225536231168989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremity sarcoma surgery entails significant costs for patients, governments and insurers. Multiple studies have described individual costs, however, the overall impact of cost on the quality of surgical care remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A narrative review with a systematic approach was undertaken to compare the impact of cost on the quality of extremity sarcoma care across low-middle-income and high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo, DARE, NHS-EED, HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: discussion of costs and the surgical management of primary extremity sarcoma. There were no restrictions on study design, publication type, date, geographic location or publication status. A data extraction table was used to identify study location, type and findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1012 studies were retrieved and 44 met the inclusion criteria. Four additional studies were identified from the reference lists of included articles. 27 studies were published in high-income countries (HIC) including all four full health economic analyses and 20 studies were published in low-middle income countries (LMC). Within LMC, cost impeded access to diagnosis, resection and options for reconstruction. In HIC, cost varied with choice of management, particularly during the long-term postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within LMC, cost impaired the provision of quality, curative care for patients with extremity sarcoma. Within HIC, while costs varied with chosen management, they were not prohibitive to the provision of quality care. Further research is required, specific to both socioeconomic contexts, to further describe the long-term cost-utility of different methods for the surgical management of extremity sarcoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":48794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"31 1","pages":"10225536231168989"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of cost on quality of surgical management in non-metastatic extremity sarcoma: A cross-country narrative literature review with a systematic approach.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Kuek,&nbsp;Chris G Schilling,&nbsp;Peter F Choong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10225536231168989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extremity sarcoma surgery entails significant costs for patients, governments and insurers. Multiple studies have described individual costs, however, the overall impact of cost on the quality of surgical care remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A narrative review with a systematic approach was undertaken to compare the impact of cost on the quality of extremity sarcoma care across low-middle-income and high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo, DARE, NHS-EED, HTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: discussion of costs and the surgical management of primary extremity sarcoma. There were no restrictions on study design, publication type, date, geographic location or publication status. A data extraction table was used to identify study location, type and findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1012 studies were retrieved and 44 met the inclusion criteria. Four additional studies were identified from the reference lists of included articles. 27 studies were published in high-income countries (HIC) including all four full health economic analyses and 20 studies were published in low-middle income countries (LMC). Within LMC, cost impeded access to diagnosis, resection and options for reconstruction. In HIC, cost varied with choice of management, particularly during the long-term postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within LMC, cost impaired the provision of quality, curative care for patients with extremity sarcoma. Within HIC, while costs varied with chosen management, they were not prohibitive to the provision of quality care. Further research is required, specific to both socioeconomic contexts, to further describe the long-term cost-utility of different methods for the surgical management of extremity sarcoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"10225536231168989\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231168989\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536231168989","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:四肢肉瘤手术对患者、政府和保险公司都有很大的成本。多项研究描述了个体成本,然而,成本对手术护理质量的总体影响仍不清楚。目的:采用系统方法进行叙述性回顾,比较中低收入和高收入国家成本对四肢肉瘤护理质量的影响。数据来源:MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo, DARE, NHS-EED, HTA。方法:采用系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南进行系统搜索。纳入标准为:讨论成本和原发性肢体肉瘤的手术治疗。没有对研究设计、出版类型、日期、地理位置或出版状态的限制。数据提取表用于确定研究地点、类型和结果。结果:共检索到1012项研究,其中44项符合纳入标准。从纳入文章的参考文献列表中确定了另外四项研究。在高收入国家(HIC)发表了27项研究,包括所有四项完整的卫生经济分析,在中低收入国家(LMC)发表了20项研究。在LMC中,成本阻碍了获得诊断、切除和重建的选择。在HIC中,费用随治疗方法的选择而变化,特别是在术后长期期间。结论:在LMC中,成本影响了为四肢肉瘤患者提供高质量、可治愈的护理。在HIC内,虽然费用因选择的管理而异,但它们并不妨碍提供高质量的护理。需要进一步的研究,具体到两种社会经济背景下,进一步描述手术治疗四肢肉瘤的不同方法的长期成本-效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of cost on quality of surgical management in non-metastatic extremity sarcoma: A cross-country narrative literature review with a systematic approach.

Background: Extremity sarcoma surgery entails significant costs for patients, governments and insurers. Multiple studies have described individual costs, however, the overall impact of cost on the quality of surgical care remains unclear.

Objectives: A narrative review with a systematic approach was undertaken to compare the impact of cost on the quality of extremity sarcoma care across low-middle-income and high-income countries.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, PsycInfo, DARE, NHS-EED, HTA.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were: discussion of costs and the surgical management of primary extremity sarcoma. There were no restrictions on study design, publication type, date, geographic location or publication status. A data extraction table was used to identify study location, type and findings.

Results: 1012 studies were retrieved and 44 met the inclusion criteria. Four additional studies were identified from the reference lists of included articles. 27 studies were published in high-income countries (HIC) including all four full health economic analyses and 20 studies were published in low-middle income countries (LMC). Within LMC, cost impeded access to diagnosis, resection and options for reconstruction. In HIC, cost varied with choice of management, particularly during the long-term postoperative period.

Conclusions: Within LMC, cost impaired the provision of quality, curative care for patients with extremity sarcoma. Within HIC, while costs varied with chosen management, they were not prohibitive to the provision of quality care. Further research is required, specific to both socioeconomic contexts, to further describe the long-term cost-utility of different methods for the surgical management of extremity sarcoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-SURGERY
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信