成年人在口吃的学龄前儿童中被重塑为流利性促进者:来自FluencyBank的证据

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Lisa LaSalle , Lesley Wolk
{"title":"成年人在口吃的学龄前儿童中被重塑为流利性促进者:来自FluencyBank的证据","authors":"Lisa LaSalle ,&nbsp;Lesley Wolk","doi":"10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adult conversational recasts are based on child platform utterances that contain errors (e.g., Child: “Me going.” Adult: “Yes, you are going”), and recasts are effective in the child language literature. For many years, adult recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances were surmised as fluency-facilitating, but to date, no evidence has been reported to support their efficacy. The purpose was to investigate the natural occurrence of, and the fluency-facilitating potential of, recasts produced by caregivers and clinicians/examiners in free-play interactions transcribed from audio or video recordings on FluencyBank. Forty-three participants with a median age of 38 mo (3;2) (Range=28–73 mo), including 32 boys and 11 girls were selected from five databases, and recasts which were near-imitations and simple recasts as per Weiss (2002) were identified. One database chosen was the Illinois project, to include a subgroup of persistent (n = 9) and recovered children (n = 9). In the 43 participants, significantly (p &lt; 0.0001) fewer stutters and lower percent syllables stuttered (%SS) were observed in post-recast utterances (4%SS) as compared to post-nonrecast utterances (12.5%SS). The CWS-persistent subgroup (n = 9) did not fit the group trend of the 34 others who significantly differed in stuttering frequency post-nonrecast versus postrecast. Findings are taken to mean that adult conversational recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances are fluency-facilitating, and interpretations are addressed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49166,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 105971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adult recasts as fluency-facilitators in preschoolers who stutter: Evidence from FluencyBank\",\"authors\":\"Lisa LaSalle ,&nbsp;Lesley Wolk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfludis.2023.105971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Adult conversational recasts are based on child platform utterances that contain errors (e.g., Child: “Me going.” Adult: “Yes, you are going”), and recasts are effective in the child language literature. For many years, adult recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances were surmised as fluency-facilitating, but to date, no evidence has been reported to support their efficacy. The purpose was to investigate the natural occurrence of, and the fluency-facilitating potential of, recasts produced by caregivers and clinicians/examiners in free-play interactions transcribed from audio or video recordings on FluencyBank. Forty-three participants with a median age of 38 mo (3;2) (Range=28–73 mo), including 32 boys and 11 girls were selected from five databases, and recasts which were near-imitations and simple recasts as per Weiss (2002) were identified. One database chosen was the Illinois project, to include a subgroup of persistent (n = 9) and recovered children (n = 9). In the 43 participants, significantly (p &lt; 0.0001) fewer stutters and lower percent syllables stuttered (%SS) were observed in post-recast utterances (4%SS) as compared to post-nonrecast utterances (12.5%SS). The CWS-persistent subgroup (n = 9) did not fit the group trend of the 34 others who significantly differed in stuttering frequency post-nonrecast versus postrecast. Findings are taken to mean that adult conversational recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances are fluency-facilitating, and interpretations are addressed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fluency Disorders\",\"volume\":\"76 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fluency Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X23000141\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fluency Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X23000141","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

成人会话重铸基于包含错误的儿童平台话语(例如,儿童:“我要走了。”成人:“是的,你要走了”),重铸在儿童语言文学中是有效的。多年来,成年人对学龄前儿童口吃话语的改写被认为有助于流利性,但到目前为止,还没有证据支持其有效性。目的是调查在FluencyBank上的音频或视频记录中转录的自由游戏互动中,护理人员和临床医生/检查人员制作的重铸的自然发生情况以及促进流利性的潜力。从五个数据库中选择43名中位年龄为38个月(3;2)(范围=28-73个月)的参与者,其中包括32名男孩和11名女孩,并根据Weiss(2002)确定了接近模仿和简单重铸的重铸。选择的一个数据库是伊利诺伊州项目,其中包括一个亚组的持续性(n=9)和康复儿童(n=9)。在43名参与者中,与未发音后(12.5%SS)相比,重铸后话语(4%SS)中观察到的口吃次数显著减少(p<0.0001),音节口吃百分比(%SS)也较低。CWS持续亚组(n=9)不符合其他34名参与者的群体趋势,他们在未发音后与重铸后的口吃频率上存在显著差异。研究结果表明,对学龄前儿童口吃话语的成人会话改写有助于流利性,并解决了解释问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adult recasts as fluency-facilitators in preschoolers who stutter: Evidence from FluencyBank

Adult conversational recasts are based on child platform utterances that contain errors (e.g., Child: “Me going.” Adult: “Yes, you are going”), and recasts are effective in the child language literature. For many years, adult recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances were surmised as fluency-facilitating, but to date, no evidence has been reported to support their efficacy. The purpose was to investigate the natural occurrence of, and the fluency-facilitating potential of, recasts produced by caregivers and clinicians/examiners in free-play interactions transcribed from audio or video recordings on FluencyBank. Forty-three participants with a median age of 38 mo (3;2) (Range=28–73 mo), including 32 boys and 11 girls were selected from five databases, and recasts which were near-imitations and simple recasts as per Weiss (2002) were identified. One database chosen was the Illinois project, to include a subgroup of persistent (n = 9) and recovered children (n = 9). In the 43 participants, significantly (p < 0.0001) fewer stutters and lower percent syllables stuttered (%SS) were observed in post-recast utterances (4%SS) as compared to post-nonrecast utterances (12.5%SS). The CWS-persistent subgroup (n = 9) did not fit the group trend of the 34 others who significantly differed in stuttering frequency post-nonrecast versus postrecast. Findings are taken to mean that adult conversational recasts of preschoolers’ stuttered utterances are fluency-facilitating, and interpretations are addressed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Journal of Fluency Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fluency Disorders provides comprehensive coverage of clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects of stuttering, including the latest remediation techniques. As the official journal of the International Fluency Association, the journal features full-length research and clinical reports; methodological, theoretical and philosophical articles; reviews; short communications and much more – all readily accessible and tailored to the needs of the professional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信