伊利诺伊州乳制品生产商心理健康服务偏好的测量。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-29 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229815
Michael Barrowclough, Brianna Messman, Daniel Lannin, Maria Boerngen, Michelle Kibler
{"title":"伊利诺伊州乳制品生产商心理健康服务偏好的测量。","authors":"Michael Barrowclough,&nbsp;Brianna Messman,&nbsp;Daniel Lannin,&nbsp;Maria Boerngen,&nbsp;Michelle Kibler","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To mitigate mental health concerns of farmers, research is needed to investigate strategies that encourage help-seeking behavior in this population. This study attempts to identify those help-seeking strategies. Six mental health service options were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey, implementing a best-worst scaling choice experiment, was disseminated to members of the Illinois Milk Producers Association. Two methods of analysis were conducted. The first, a count-based method, employs a simple count-based approach to measure the relative preferences for the six mental health service options in question. The second is more complex and employs a latent-class logit regression model to measure individual preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mental-health service options, ranked in order from most preferred to least preferred were: 1) speak to family and friends, 2) keep it to myself, 3) utilize programs offered by agricultural organizations, 4) search online for self-help resources, 5) talk to a mental health professional, and 6) use \"tele-health\" support services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study examined an important gap in the literature concerning help-seeking preferences of dairy farmers. It is the first to utilize a choice experiment approach to assess help-seeking preferences among this understudied population. Results provide important empirical evidence to support distinct categories of farmers who may be weighing options regarding how to best address their mental health concerns.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Mental Health Service Preferences Amongst Illinois Dairy Producers.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Barrowclough,&nbsp;Brianna Messman,&nbsp;Daniel Lannin,&nbsp;Maria Boerngen,&nbsp;Michelle Kibler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To mitigate mental health concerns of farmers, research is needed to investigate strategies that encourage help-seeking behavior in this population. This study attempts to identify those help-seeking strategies. Six mental health service options were examined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey, implementing a best-worst scaling choice experiment, was disseminated to members of the Illinois Milk Producers Association. Two methods of analysis were conducted. The first, a count-based method, employs a simple count-based approach to measure the relative preferences for the six mental health service options in question. The second is more complex and employs a latent-class logit regression model to measure individual preferences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mental-health service options, ranked in order from most preferred to least preferred were: 1) speak to family and friends, 2) keep it to myself, 3) utilize programs offered by agricultural organizations, 4) search online for self-help resources, 5) talk to a mental health professional, and 6) use \\\"tele-health\\\" support services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study examined an important gap in the literature concerning help-seeking preferences of dairy farmers. It is the first to utilize a choice experiment approach to assess help-seeking preferences among this understudied population. Results provide important empirical evidence to support distinct categories of farmers who may be weighing options regarding how to best address their mental health concerns.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49172,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agromedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229815\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2023.2229815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了减轻农民的心理健康问题,需要研究鼓励这一人群求助行为的策略。本研究试图确定那些寻求帮助的策略。研究了六种心理健康服务选择。方法:向伊利诺伊州牛奶生产者协会的成员分发一项调查,实施最佳-最差比例选择实验。进行了两种分析方法。第一种是基于计数的方法,采用一种简单的基于计数的方式来衡量六种心理健康服务选项的相对偏好。第二种更为复杂,采用潜在类logit回归模型来衡量个人偏好。结果:心理健康服务选项从最受欢迎到最不受欢迎依次为:1)与家人和朋友交谈,2)保密,3)利用农业组织提供的项目,4)在线搜索自助资源,5)与心理健康专业人员交谈,6)使用“远程健康”支持服务。结论:本研究考察了文献中关于奶农求助偏好的一个重要空白。它首次利用选择实验方法来评估这一研究不足人群的求助偏好。研究结果提供了重要的经验证据,支持不同类别的农民,他们可能正在权衡如何最好地解决他们的心理健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring Mental Health Service Preferences Amongst Illinois Dairy Producers.

Objectives: To mitigate mental health concerns of farmers, research is needed to investigate strategies that encourage help-seeking behavior in this population. This study attempts to identify those help-seeking strategies. Six mental health service options were examined.

Methods: A survey, implementing a best-worst scaling choice experiment, was disseminated to members of the Illinois Milk Producers Association. Two methods of analysis were conducted. The first, a count-based method, employs a simple count-based approach to measure the relative preferences for the six mental health service options in question. The second is more complex and employs a latent-class logit regression model to measure individual preferences.

Results: The mental-health service options, ranked in order from most preferred to least preferred were: 1) speak to family and friends, 2) keep it to myself, 3) utilize programs offered by agricultural organizations, 4) search online for self-help resources, 5) talk to a mental health professional, and 6) use "tele-health" support services.

Conclusion: This study examined an important gap in the literature concerning help-seeking preferences of dairy farmers. It is the first to utilize a choice experiment approach to assess help-seeking preferences among this understudied population. Results provide important empirical evidence to support distinct categories of farmers who may be weighing options regarding how to best address their mental health concerns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信