在中国健康男性受试者中比较重组人源抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体注射液与阿瓦斯汀®的药代动力学生物相似性和安全性的I期研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hongtao Li, Xiangdi Zhao, Jing Xie, Xingyu Zhu, Yue Su, Cuixia He, Jiaxiang Ding, Minhui Zhu, Yuanyuan Xu, Ying Wang, Rongfang Shan, Bingyan Liu, Yuzhou Ding, Yuanyuan Liu, Huan Zhou, Yunqiu Xie
{"title":"在中国健康男性受试者中比较重组人源抗血管内皮生长因子单克隆抗体注射液与阿瓦斯汀®的药代动力学生物相似性和安全性的I期研究。","authors":"Hongtao Li,&nbsp;Xiangdi Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Xie,&nbsp;Xingyu Zhu,&nbsp;Yue Su,&nbsp;Cuixia He,&nbsp;Jiaxiang Ding,&nbsp;Minhui Zhu,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Xu,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Rongfang Shan,&nbsp;Bingyan Liu,&nbsp;Yuzhou Ding,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liu,&nbsp;Huan Zhou,&nbsp;Yunqiu Xie","doi":"10.1186/s40360-023-00673-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The biosimilar landscape for malignancies continues to grow, with several biosimilars for reference product bevacizumab currently available. Bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody injection remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to that of Avastin® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and parallel-group study was performed on 88 healthy men who randomly (1:1) received either the test drug as an intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg or Avastin®. The primary PK parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). Secondary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), AUC from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), safety, and immunogenicity. Serum bevacizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> between the test group and reference group were 91.71%-103.18%, 95.72%-107.49% and 91.03%-103.43%, respectively. These values were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80.00%-125.00%, demonstrating the biosimilarity of the test drug and Avastin®. Eighty-one treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with a comparable incidence among the test group (90.91%) and the reference group (93.18%). No serious adverse events were reported. The incidence of ADA antibodies in the two groups was low and similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In healthy Chinese men, PK similarity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to Avastin® was confirmed, with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Subsequent studies should investigate recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection in patients setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered 08/10/2019, CTR20191923.</p>","PeriodicalId":9023,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223897/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin<sup>®</sup> in healthy Chinese male subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Hongtao Li,&nbsp;Xiangdi Zhao,&nbsp;Jing Xie,&nbsp;Xingyu Zhu,&nbsp;Yue Su,&nbsp;Cuixia He,&nbsp;Jiaxiang Ding,&nbsp;Minhui Zhu,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Xu,&nbsp;Ying Wang,&nbsp;Rongfang Shan,&nbsp;Bingyan Liu,&nbsp;Yuzhou Ding,&nbsp;Yuanyuan Liu,&nbsp;Huan Zhou,&nbsp;Yunqiu Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40360-023-00673-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The biosimilar landscape for malignancies continues to grow, with several biosimilars for reference product bevacizumab currently available. Bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody injection remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to that of Avastin® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and parallel-group study was performed on 88 healthy men who randomly (1:1) received either the test drug as an intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg or Avastin®. The primary PK parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>). Secondary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (C<sub>max</sub>), AUC from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>inf</sub>), safety, and immunogenicity. Serum bevacizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>inf</sub> between the test group and reference group were 91.71%-103.18%, 95.72%-107.49% and 91.03%-103.43%, respectively. These values were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80.00%-125.00%, demonstrating the biosimilarity of the test drug and Avastin®. Eighty-one treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with a comparable incidence among the test group (90.91%) and the reference group (93.18%). No serious adverse events were reported. The incidence of ADA antibodies in the two groups was low and similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In healthy Chinese men, PK similarity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to Avastin® was confirmed, with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Subsequent studies should investigate recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection in patients setting.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered 08/10/2019, CTR20191923.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10223897/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00673-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-023-00673-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:用于恶性肿瘤的生物类似药持续增长,目前有几种参考产品贝伐单抗的生物类似药可用。贝伐单抗已被证明具有良好的耐受性;然而,重组人源化抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)单克隆抗体注射的安全性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较重组人源化抗vegf单克隆抗体注射液与阿瓦斯汀®在中国健康男性志愿者体内的药代动力学(PK)、安全性和免疫原性。方法:对88名健康男性进行随机、双盲、单剂量、平行组研究,随机(1:1)接受试验药物静脉滴注3mg /kg或阿瓦斯汀®。主要PK参数为从时间0到最后可量化浓度的血清浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC) (AUC0-t)。次要终点包括最大观察血清浓度(Cmax)、从0外推到无穷大的AUC (AUCinf)、安全性和免疫原性。使用经验证的酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)测量血清贝伐单抗浓度。结果:两组患者的基线特征相似。试验组与参照组AUC0-t、Cmax和AUCinf几何平均比值的90%置信区间(CI)分别为91.71% ~ 103.18%、95.72% ~ 107.49%和91.03% ~ 103.43%。这些值均在预定的80.00%-125.00%的生物等效性范围内,表明受测药物与Avastin®具有生物相似性。报告了81例治疗后出现的不良事件,试验组(90.91%)和参照组(93.18%)的发生率相当。无严重不良事件报告。两组ADA抗体的发生率低且相似。结论:在中国健康男性中,重组人源化抗vegf单克隆抗体注射液与阿瓦斯汀(Avastin)的PK相似,具有相当的安全性和免疫原性。后续研究应探讨重组人源化抗vegf单克隆抗体注射在患者中的应用。试验报名:2019年8月10日注册,编号:CTR20191923。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin<sup>®</sup> in healthy Chinese male subjects.

A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin<sup>®</sup> in healthy Chinese male subjects.

A phase I study comparing the biosimilarity of the pharmacokinetics and safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monoclonal antibody injection with Avastin® in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Background: The biosimilar landscape for malignancies continues to grow, with several biosimilars for reference product bevacizumab currently available. Bevacizumab has been shown to be well tolerated; however, the safety of recombinant humanized anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody injection remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to that of Avastin® in healthy Chinese male volunteers.

Methods: A randomized, double-blind, single-dose, and parallel-group study was performed on 88 healthy men who randomly (1:1) received either the test drug as an intravenous infusion of 3 mg/kg or Avastin®. The primary PK parameter was area under the serum concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t). Secondary endpoints included maximum observed serum concentration (Cmax), AUC from 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf), safety, and immunogenicity. Serum bevacizumab concentrations were measured using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Results: The baseline characteristics were similar among the two groups. The 90% confidence interval (CI) for the geometric mean ratio of AUC0-t, Cmax and AUCinf between the test group and reference group were 91.71%-103.18%, 95.72%-107.49% and 91.03%-103.43%, respectively. These values were within the predefined bioequivalence margin of 80.00%-125.00%, demonstrating the biosimilarity of the test drug and Avastin®. Eighty-one treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with a comparable incidence among the test group (90.91%) and the reference group (93.18%). No serious adverse events were reported. The incidence of ADA antibodies in the two groups was low and similar.

Conclusion: In healthy Chinese men, PK similarity of recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection to Avastin® was confirmed, with comparable safety and immunogenicity. Subsequent studies should investigate recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody injection in patients setting.

Trial registration: Registered 08/10/2019, CTR20191923.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology
BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACYTOXICOLOGY&nb-TOXICOLOGY
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of chemically defined therapeutic and toxic agents. The journal welcomes submissions from all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology including clinical trials and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信