{"title":"制药业市场力量的政治经济学。","authors":"Amy Kapczynski","doi":"10.1215/03616878-10234184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pharmaceutical industry is among the most politically powerful in the US today. This article describes how industry successfully has entrenched its power, with attention to four sources of power: property power, vertical power over politics, ideational power, and material power. Attempts to reform the industry must grapple with these forms of power, which are not easily separated and in the current environment tend to reinforce one another.","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Political Economy of Market Power in Pharmaceuticals.\",\"authors\":\"Amy Kapczynski\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/03616878-10234184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pharmaceutical industry is among the most politically powerful in the US today. This article describes how industry successfully has entrenched its power, with attention to four sources of power: property power, vertical power over politics, ideational power, and material power. Attempts to reform the industry must grapple with these forms of power, which are not easily separated and in the current environment tend to reinforce one another.\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10234184\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-10234184","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Political Economy of Market Power in Pharmaceuticals.
The pharmaceutical industry is among the most politically powerful in the US today. This article describes how industry successfully has entrenched its power, with attention to four sources of power: property power, vertical power over politics, ideational power, and material power. Attempts to reform the industry must grapple with these forms of power, which are not easily separated and in the current environment tend to reinforce one another.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
