评估音频记录和诊所环境对过度哮鸣音和可闻鼻音评级的一致性。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-26 DOI:10.1177/10556656231185494
Jessica L Williams, Kelly N Cordero, Thomas J Sitzman
{"title":"评估音频记录和诊所环境对过度哮鸣音和可闻鼻音评级的一致性。","authors":"Jessica L Williams, Kelly N Cordero, Thomas J Sitzman","doi":"10.1177/10556656231185494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assess agreement of hypernasality and audible nasal emission (ANE) ratings between audio-recordings and a clinic setting.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional study using retrospective clinical recordings.</p><p><p>Audio-recording ratings by two trained speech language pathologists.</p><p><p>Percent agreement and intra- and inter-rater reliability of perceptual ratings.</p><p><p>Intra-rater reliability (AC2) of 167 audio-recorded speech samples for the primary and secondary raters, respectively, was 0.82 and 0.79 for hypernasality; for ANE, it was 0.57 and 0.75. Inter-rater reliability was 0.77 for hypernasality and 0.63 for ANE. When comparing ratings made from audio-recording versus the original clinical ratings, intra-rater reliability was 0.85 and 0.61 (primary and secondary rater, respectively) for hypernasality and 0.21 and 0.34 for ANE.</p><p><p>Ratings for hypernasality made from audio recordings were consistent with clinical evaluation, while ratings of ANE were not. ANE ratings made from audio recordings may not be a valid measure of velopharyngeal insufficiency speech characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":55255,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Agreement of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission Ratings Between Audio-Recordings and a Clinic Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica L Williams, Kelly N Cordero, Thomas J Sitzman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10556656231185494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Assess agreement of hypernasality and audible nasal emission (ANE) ratings between audio-recordings and a clinic setting.</p><p><p>Cross-sectional study using retrospective clinical recordings.</p><p><p>Audio-recording ratings by two trained speech language pathologists.</p><p><p>Percent agreement and intra- and inter-rater reliability of perceptual ratings.</p><p><p>Intra-rater reliability (AC2) of 167 audio-recorded speech samples for the primary and secondary raters, respectively, was 0.82 and 0.79 for hypernasality; for ANE, it was 0.57 and 0.75. Inter-rater reliability was 0.77 for hypernasality and 0.63 for ANE. When comparing ratings made from audio-recording versus the original clinical ratings, intra-rater reliability was 0.85 and 0.61 (primary and secondary rater, respectively) for hypernasality and 0.21 and 0.34 for ANE.</p><p><p>Ratings for hypernasality made from audio recordings were consistent with clinical evaluation, while ratings of ANE were not. ANE ratings made from audio recordings may not be a valid measure of velopharyngeal insufficiency speech characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231185494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231185494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用回顾性临床记录进行横断面研究,由两名经过培训的语言病理学家进行录音评分,评估感知评分的一致性百分比以及评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性。在 167 个录音语音样本中,主要评分者和辅助评分者的评分者内部可靠性(AC2)分别为 0.82 和 0.79(高鼻音);ANE 为 0.57 和 0.75。评分者之间的可靠性分别为 0.77 和 0.63。如果将录音评分与原始临床评分进行比较,高鼻音的评分者内部信度分别为 0.85 和 0.61(主要评分者和辅助评分者),ANE 的评分者内部信度分别为 0.21 和 0.34。从录音中得出的 ANE 评分可能不是衡量发展咽喉功能不全言语特征的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the Agreement of Hypernasality and Audible Nasal Emission Ratings Between Audio-Recordings and a Clinic Setting.

Assess agreement of hypernasality and audible nasal emission (ANE) ratings between audio-recordings and a clinic setting.

Cross-sectional study using retrospective clinical recordings.

Audio-recording ratings by two trained speech language pathologists.

Percent agreement and intra- and inter-rater reliability of perceptual ratings.

Intra-rater reliability (AC2) of 167 audio-recorded speech samples for the primary and secondary raters, respectively, was 0.82 and 0.79 for hypernasality; for ANE, it was 0.57 and 0.75. Inter-rater reliability was 0.77 for hypernasality and 0.63 for ANE. When comparing ratings made from audio-recording versus the original clinical ratings, intra-rater reliability was 0.85 and 0.61 (primary and secondary rater, respectively) for hypernasality and 0.21 and 0.34 for ANE.

Ratings for hypernasality made from audio recordings were consistent with clinical evaluation, while ratings of ANE were not. ANE ratings made from audio recordings may not be a valid measure of velopharyngeal insufficiency speech characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
36.40%
发文量
215
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信