等级,分类,枝形图和系统发育

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q1 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Cladistics Pub Date : 2023-02-14 DOI:10.1111/cla.12525
Andrew V. Z. Brower
{"title":"等级,分类,枝形图和系统发育","authors":"Andrew V. Z. Brower","doi":"10.1111/cla.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Figure 18 of Hennig's <i>Phylogenetic Systematics</i> (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1966) shows a phylogenetic tree (a generative hierarchy) and what appear to be nested sets (an inclusive hierarchy) that he stated were two representations of the same pattern of relationships. This essay questions whether this is correct or not, explores the meanings of different hierarchical patterns, reviews various interpretations of Hennig's figure, and discusses the conceptual path from systematic evidence to phylogenetic explanation. The crux of the argument is that systematic hierarchies as we know them scientifically are nested sets that group theoretical entities based on patterns of synapomorphy. The notions of phylogeny and common ancestry reflect this hierarchical pattern.</p>","PeriodicalId":50688,"journal":{"name":"Cladistics","volume":"39 3","pages":"229-239"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hierarchies, classifications, cladograms and phylogeny\",\"authors\":\"Andrew V. Z. Brower\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cla.12525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Figure 18 of Hennig's <i>Phylogenetic Systematics</i> (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1966) shows a phylogenetic tree (a generative hierarchy) and what appear to be nested sets (an inclusive hierarchy) that he stated were two representations of the same pattern of relationships. This essay questions whether this is correct or not, explores the meanings of different hierarchical patterns, reviews various interpretations of Hennig's figure, and discusses the conceptual path from systematic evidence to phylogenetic explanation. The crux of the argument is that systematic hierarchies as we know them scientifically are nested sets that group theoretical entities based on patterns of synapomorphy. The notions of phylogeny and common ancestry reflect this hierarchical pattern.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cladistics\",\"volume\":\"39 3\",\"pages\":\"229-239\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cladistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cladistics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cla.12525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Hennig的系统发育系统学(伊利诺伊大学出版社,伊利诺伊州厄巴纳,1966年)的图18显示了一个系统发育树(一个生成层次)和似乎是嵌套集(一个包容性层次)的东西,他说这是同一关系模式的两种表示。本文质疑这是否正确,探讨了不同层次模式的含义,回顾了对Hennig图形的各种解释,并讨论了从系统证据到系统发育解释的概念路径。争论的关键是,我们在科学上所知的系统层次结构是嵌套的集合,基于突触形态模式对理论实体进行分组。系统发育和共同祖先的概念反映了这种等级模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hierarchies, classifications, cladograms and phylogeny

Figure 18 of Hennig's Phylogenetic Systematics (University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL, 1966) shows a phylogenetic tree (a generative hierarchy) and what appear to be nested sets (an inclusive hierarchy) that he stated were two representations of the same pattern of relationships. This essay questions whether this is correct or not, explores the meanings of different hierarchical patterns, reviews various interpretations of Hennig's figure, and discusses the conceptual path from systematic evidence to phylogenetic explanation. The crux of the argument is that systematic hierarchies as we know them scientifically are nested sets that group theoretical entities based on patterns of synapomorphy. The notions of phylogeny and common ancestry reflect this hierarchical pattern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cladistics
Cladistics 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Cladistics publishes high quality research papers on systematics, encouraging debate on all aspects of the field, from philosophy, theory and methodology to empirical studies and applications in biogeography, coevolution, conservation biology, ontogeny, genomics and paleontology. Cladistics is read by scientists working in the research fields of evolution, systematics and integrative biology and enjoys a consistently high position in the ISI® rankings for evolutionary biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信