草青贮过程中吹包腐坏相关的酯芽孢杆菌和气芽孢杆菌孢子的存活。

Eden Esteves, Paul Whyte, Tanushree B Gupta, Declan Bolton
{"title":"草青贮过程中吹包腐坏相关的酯芽孢杆菌和气芽孢杆菌孢子的存活。","authors":"Eden Esteves,&nbsp;Paul Whyte,&nbsp;Tanushree B Gupta,&nbsp;Declan Bolton","doi":"10.1093/femsmc/xtab013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blown pack spoilage (BPS) of vacuum packaged primals, caused by <i>Clostridium estertheticum</i> and <i>Clostridium gasigenes</i>, is a serious issue for the beef industry. There are multiple sources of these bacteria on beef farms, including grass and associated feed preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of <i>C. estertheticum</i> and <i>C. gasigenes</i> spores during the ensiling of grass and the subsequent opening of the silos. Grass, harvested from fields, with and without cattle slurry amendment, was inoculated with approximately 100 spores/g and ensiled using a laboratory (silo) model system at 20°C in the dark. Adding formic acid or sucrose resulted in six treatment combination as follows: no slurry (NS), no slurry plus formic acid (NSFA), no slurry plus sucrose (NSS), slurry (S), slurry plus formic acid (SFA) and slurry plus sucrose (SS). During the silage fermentation, samples were removed periodically and tested for <i>C. estertheticum</i>, <i>C. gasigenes</i>, total viable, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts. The pH, ethanol, volatile fatty acids (VFA), lactic acid and ammonia concentrations were also monitored throughout the experiment. <i>C. estertheticum</i> did not survive the ensiling process, regardless of treatment. In contrast, <i>C. gasigenes</i> grew in the early stages and was detected during the entirety of the fermentation for all treatments. Based on these observations, it was concluded that the silage fermentation process described would not remove <i>C. gasigenes</i> and contaminated grass may result in contaminated feed for animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":73024,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbes","volume":"2 ","pages":"xtab013"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The survival of blown pack spoilage associated <i>Clostridium estertheticum</i> and <i>Clostridium gasigenes</i> spores during the ensiling of grass.\",\"authors\":\"Eden Esteves,&nbsp;Paul Whyte,&nbsp;Tanushree B Gupta,&nbsp;Declan Bolton\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsmc/xtab013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Blown pack spoilage (BPS) of vacuum packaged primals, caused by <i>Clostridium estertheticum</i> and <i>Clostridium gasigenes</i>, is a serious issue for the beef industry. There are multiple sources of these bacteria on beef farms, including grass and associated feed preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of <i>C. estertheticum</i> and <i>C. gasigenes</i> spores during the ensiling of grass and the subsequent opening of the silos. Grass, harvested from fields, with and without cattle slurry amendment, was inoculated with approximately 100 spores/g and ensiled using a laboratory (silo) model system at 20°C in the dark. Adding formic acid or sucrose resulted in six treatment combination as follows: no slurry (NS), no slurry plus formic acid (NSFA), no slurry plus sucrose (NSS), slurry (S), slurry plus formic acid (SFA) and slurry plus sucrose (SS). During the silage fermentation, samples were removed periodically and tested for <i>C. estertheticum</i>, <i>C. gasigenes</i>, total viable, <i>Escherichia coli</i>, <i>Enterobacteriaceae</i> and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts. The pH, ethanol, volatile fatty acids (VFA), lactic acid and ammonia concentrations were also monitored throughout the experiment. <i>C. estertheticum</i> did not survive the ensiling process, regardless of treatment. In contrast, <i>C. gasigenes</i> grew in the early stages and was detected during the entirety of the fermentation for all treatments. Based on these observations, it was concluded that the silage fermentation process described would not remove <i>C. gasigenes</i> and contaminated grass may result in contaminated feed for animals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"xtab013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10117822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtab013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtab013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由酯梭菌和气梭菌引起的真空包装原料的吹包装腐败(BPS)是牛肉行业的一个严重问题。这些细菌在养牛场有多种来源,包括草和相关的饲料制剂。本研究的目的是研究草青贮和随后的筒仓打开过程中estertheticum和C. gasigenes孢子的存活情况。从田间收获的草,有或没有牛浆改进剂,接种约100孢子/g,并使用实验室(筒仓)模型系统在20°C的黑暗中青贮。添加甲酸或蔗糖可产生无料浆(NS)、无料浆加甲酸(NSFA)、无料浆加蔗糖(NSS)、料浆(S)、料浆加甲酸(SFA)和料浆加蔗糖(SS) 6种处理组合。在青贮发酵过程中,定期去除样品,检测C. estertheticum、C. gasigenes、总活菌、大肠杆菌、肠杆菌科和乳酸菌(LAB)计数。在整个实验过程中监测pH、乙醇、挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)、乳酸和氨浓度。无论采用何种处理方法,大肠杆菌都不能在青贮过程中存活。相比之下,在所有处理中,产气假丝酵母都在发酵初期生长,并且在整个发酵过程中都有检测到。综上所述,青贮发酵工艺不能去除产气梭菌,受污染的草料可能导致动物饲料受到污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The survival of blown pack spoilage associated Clostridium estertheticum and Clostridium gasigenes spores during the ensiling of grass.

Blown pack spoilage (BPS) of vacuum packaged primals, caused by Clostridium estertheticum and Clostridium gasigenes, is a serious issue for the beef industry. There are multiple sources of these bacteria on beef farms, including grass and associated feed preparations. The aim of this study was to investigate the survival of C. estertheticum and C. gasigenes spores during the ensiling of grass and the subsequent opening of the silos. Grass, harvested from fields, with and without cattle slurry amendment, was inoculated with approximately 100 spores/g and ensiled using a laboratory (silo) model system at 20°C in the dark. Adding formic acid or sucrose resulted in six treatment combination as follows: no slurry (NS), no slurry plus formic acid (NSFA), no slurry plus sucrose (NSS), slurry (S), slurry plus formic acid (SFA) and slurry plus sucrose (SS). During the silage fermentation, samples were removed periodically and tested for C. estertheticum, C. gasigenes, total viable, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteriaceae and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts. The pH, ethanol, volatile fatty acids (VFA), lactic acid and ammonia concentrations were also monitored throughout the experiment. C. estertheticum did not survive the ensiling process, regardless of treatment. In contrast, C. gasigenes grew in the early stages and was detected during the entirety of the fermentation for all treatments. Based on these observations, it was concluded that the silage fermentation process described would not remove C. gasigenes and contaminated grass may result in contaminated feed for animals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信