Stine Linding Andersen, Annebirthe Bo Hansen, Peter Hindersson, Lærke Andersen, Peter Astrup Christensen
{"title":"维生素B12参考区间。","authors":"Stine Linding Andersen, Annebirthe Bo Hansen, Peter Hindersson, Lærke Andersen, Peter Astrup Christensen","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>P-Vitamin B12 is a commonly used biochemical test. Evaluation of test results and diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency are challenging, and the role of different biochemical methods remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays (method 1: Alinity, Abbott Laboratories; method 2: Cobas 6000, Roche Diagnostics; method 3: Atellica IM, Siemens Healthineers). Direct reference intervals were established among blood donors (n = 129) and indirect reference intervals among adult patient results of plasma vitamin B12 concentration requested by general practitioners in the North Denmark Region from 15 August to 15 October 2022 (n = 34,181). Finally, the frequency of low vitamin B12 concentration using different uniform cut-offs was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) were as follows for method 1: 168-553 pmol/l; method 2: 202-641 pmol/l; and method 3: 211-551 pmol/l. Indirect reference intervals were as follows for method 1: 133-541 pmol/l; method 2: 172-619 pmol/l; and method 3: 182-162-206 pmol/l. When different cut-offs were applied to patient results, the frequency of having a vitamin B12 concentration below 250 pmol/l differed by biochemical method: 33% (method 1), 17% (method 2) and 14% (method 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays revealed results and reference intervals that were not interchangeable. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency should consider the biochemical methods used.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11119,"journal":{"name":"Danish medical journal","volume":"70 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vitamin B12 reference intervals.\",\"authors\":\"Stine Linding Andersen, Annebirthe Bo Hansen, Peter Hindersson, Lærke Andersen, Peter Astrup Christensen\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>P-Vitamin B12 is a commonly used biochemical test. Evaluation of test results and diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency are challenging, and the role of different biochemical methods remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays (method 1: Alinity, Abbott Laboratories; method 2: Cobas 6000, Roche Diagnostics; method 3: Atellica IM, Siemens Healthineers). Direct reference intervals were established among blood donors (n = 129) and indirect reference intervals among adult patient results of plasma vitamin B12 concentration requested by general practitioners in the North Denmark Region from 15 August to 15 October 2022 (n = 34,181). Finally, the frequency of low vitamin B12 concentration using different uniform cut-offs was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Direct reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) were as follows for method 1: 168-553 pmol/l; method 2: 202-641 pmol/l; and method 3: 211-551 pmol/l. Indirect reference intervals were as follows for method 1: 133-541 pmol/l; method 2: 172-619 pmol/l; and method 3: 182-162-206 pmol/l. When different cut-offs were applied to patient results, the frequency of having a vitamin B12 concentration below 250 pmol/l differed by biochemical method: 33% (method 1), 17% (method 2) and 14% (method 3).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Measurement of plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays revealed results and reference intervals that were not interchangeable. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency should consider the biochemical methods used.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"volume\":\"70 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Danish medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Danish medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: P-Vitamin B12 is a commonly used biochemical test. Evaluation of test results and diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency are challenging, and the role of different biochemical methods remains unclear.
Methods: The aim of this study was to establish reference intervals for plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays (method 1: Alinity, Abbott Laboratories; method 2: Cobas 6000, Roche Diagnostics; method 3: Atellica IM, Siemens Healthineers). Direct reference intervals were established among blood donors (n = 129) and indirect reference intervals among adult patient results of plasma vitamin B12 concentration requested by general practitioners in the North Denmark Region from 15 August to 15 October 2022 (n = 34,181). Finally, the frequency of low vitamin B12 concentration using different uniform cut-offs was evaluated.
Results: Direct reference intervals (2.5-97.5 percentiles) were as follows for method 1: 168-553 pmol/l; method 2: 202-641 pmol/l; and method 3: 211-551 pmol/l. Indirect reference intervals were as follows for method 1: 133-541 pmol/l; method 2: 172-619 pmol/l; and method 3: 182-162-206 pmol/l. When different cut-offs were applied to patient results, the frequency of having a vitamin B12 concentration below 250 pmol/l differed by biochemical method: 33% (method 1), 17% (method 2) and 14% (method 3).
Conclusion: Measurement of plasma vitamin B12 concentration using different immunoassays revealed results and reference intervals that were not interchangeable. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of vitamin B12 deficiency should consider the biochemical methods used.
期刊介绍:
The Danish Medical Journal (DMJ) is a general medical journal. The journal publish original research in English – conducted in or in relation to the Danish health-care system. When writing for the Danish Medical Journal please remember target audience which is the general reader. This means that the research area should be relevant to many readers and the paper should be presented in a way that most readers will understand the content.
DMJ will publish the following articles:
• Original articles
• Protocol articles from large randomized clinical trials
• Systematic reviews and meta-analyses
• PhD theses from Danish faculties of health sciences
• DMSc theses from Danish faculties of health sciences.