体外肝脏支持技术:比较。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Journal of Artificial Organs Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.1007/s10047-023-01409-9
Ivano Riva, Antonella Marino, Tino Martino Valetti, Gianmariano Marchesi, Fabrizio Fabretti
{"title":"体外肝脏支持技术:比较。","authors":"Ivano Riva, Antonella Marino, Tino Martino Valetti, Gianmariano Marchesi, Fabrizio Fabretti","doi":"10.1007/s10047-023-01409-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ExtraCorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) systems were developed with the aim of supporting the liver in its detoxification function by clearing the blood from hepatic toxic molecules. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis on patients presenting with liver failure who were treated with different extracorporeal techniques in our intensive care unit to evaluate and compare their detoxification abilities. To verify the effectiveness of the techniques, mass balance (MB) and adsorption per hour were calculated for total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), and bile acids (BA) from the concentrations measured. MB represents the total amount (mg or mcMol) of a molecule removed from a solution and is the only representative parameter to verify the purification effectiveness of one system as it is not affected by the continuous production of the molecules, released in the circulation from the tissues, as it is the case for the reduction rate (RR). The total adsorption per hour is calculated by the ratio between MB and the time duration and shows the adsorption ability in an hour. Our comparative study shows the superior adsorption capability of CytoSorb system regarding TB, DB, and BA, evaluated through the MB and adsorption per hour, in comparison with CPFA, MARS, Prometheus, and PAP. In conclusion, as extracorporeal purification in liver failure could be considered useful for therapeutic purposes, Cytosorb, being more performing than other systems considered, could represent the device of first choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison.\",\"authors\":\"Ivano Riva, Antonella Marino, Tino Martino Valetti, Gianmariano Marchesi, Fabrizio Fabretti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10047-023-01409-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ExtraCorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) systems were developed with the aim of supporting the liver in its detoxification function by clearing the blood from hepatic toxic molecules. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis on patients presenting with liver failure who were treated with different extracorporeal techniques in our intensive care unit to evaluate and compare their detoxification abilities. To verify the effectiveness of the techniques, mass balance (MB) and adsorption per hour were calculated for total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), and bile acids (BA) from the concentrations measured. MB represents the total amount (mg or mcMol) of a molecule removed from a solution and is the only representative parameter to verify the purification effectiveness of one system as it is not affected by the continuous production of the molecules, released in the circulation from the tissues, as it is the case for the reduction rate (RR). The total adsorption per hour is calculated by the ratio between MB and the time duration and shows the adsorption ability in an hour. Our comparative study shows the superior adsorption capability of CytoSorb system regarding TB, DB, and BA, evaluated through the MB and adsorption per hour, in comparison with CPFA, MARS, Prometheus, and PAP. In conclusion, as extracorporeal purification in liver failure could be considered useful for therapeutic purposes, Cytosorb, being more performing than other systems considered, could represent the device of first choice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11345327/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-023-01409-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-023-01409-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发体外肝脏支持(ECLS)系统的目的是通过清除血液中的肝毒性分子来支持肝脏的解毒功能。我们对在重症监护室接受不同体外疗法的肝衰竭患者进行了回顾性对比分析,以评估和比较这些疗法的解毒能力。为了验证这些技术的有效性,我们根据测得的浓度计算了总胆红素(TB)、直接胆红素(DB)和胆汁酸(BA)的质量平衡(MB)和每小时吸附量。MB 表示从溶液中去除的分子总量(毫克或微克摩尔),是验证一个系统净化效果的唯一代表性参数,因为它不会像还原率 (RR) 那样,受到从组织中释放到循环中的分子持续产生的影响。每小时的总吸附量由 MB 与持续时间之比计算得出,显示了一小时内的吸附能力。我们的比较研究表明,通过 MB 和每小时吸附量的评估,与 CPFA、MARS、Prometheus 和 PAP 相比,CytoSorb 系统对 TB、DB 和 BA 的吸附能力更强。总之,由于肝衰竭体外净化可用于治疗目的,Cytosorb 与其他系统相比性能更佳,可作为首选设备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison.

Extracorporeal liver support techniques: a comparison.

ExtraCorporeal Liver Support (ECLS) systems were developed with the aim of supporting the liver in its detoxification function by clearing the blood from hepatic toxic molecules. We conducted a retrospective comparative analysis on patients presenting with liver failure who were treated with different extracorporeal techniques in our intensive care unit to evaluate and compare their detoxification abilities. To verify the effectiveness of the techniques, mass balance (MB) and adsorption per hour were calculated for total bilirubin (TB), direct bilirubin (DB), and bile acids (BA) from the concentrations measured. MB represents the total amount (mg or mcMol) of a molecule removed from a solution and is the only representative parameter to verify the purification effectiveness of one system as it is not affected by the continuous production of the molecules, released in the circulation from the tissues, as it is the case for the reduction rate (RR). The total adsorption per hour is calculated by the ratio between MB and the time duration and shows the adsorption ability in an hour. Our comparative study shows the superior adsorption capability of CytoSorb system regarding TB, DB, and BA, evaluated through the MB and adsorption per hour, in comparison with CPFA, MARS, Prometheus, and PAP. In conclusion, as extracorporeal purification in liver failure could be considered useful for therapeutic purposes, Cytosorb, being more performing than other systems considered, could represent the device of first choice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Artificial Organs
Journal of Artificial Organs 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
15.40%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信