Ken F Jarrell, Sonja-Verena Albers, J Nuno de Sousa Machado
{"title":"古细菌运动和古细菌分裂的全面历史。","authors":"Ken F Jarrell, Sonja-Verena Albers, J Nuno de Sousa Machado","doi":"10.1093/femsmc/xtab002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Each of the three Domains of life, Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea, have swimming structures that were all originally called flagella, despite the fact that none were evolutionarily related to either of the other two. Surprisingly, this was true even in the two prokaryotic Domains of Bacteria and Archaea. Beginning in the 1980s, evidence gradually accumulated that convincingly demonstrated that the motility organelle in Archaea was unrelated to that found in Bacteria, but surprisingly shared significant similarities to type IV pili. This information culminated in the proposal, in 2012, that the 'archaeal flagellum' be assigned a new name, the archaellum. In this review, we provide a historical overview on archaella and motility research in Archaea, beginning with the first simple observations of motile extreme halophilic archaea a century ago up to state-of-the-art cryo-tomography of the archaellum motor complex and filament observed today. In addition to structural and biochemical data which revealed the archaellum to be a type IV pilus-like structure repurposed as a rotating nanomachine (Beeby <i>et al</i>. 2020), we also review the initial discoveries and subsequent advances using a wide variety of approaches to reveal: complex regulatory events that lead to the assembly of the archaellum filaments (archaellation); the roles of the various archaellum proteins; key post-translational modifications of the archaellum structural subunits; evolutionary relationships; functions of archaella other than motility and the biotechnological potential of this fascinating structure. The progress made in understanding the structure and assembly of the archaellum is highlighted by comparing early models to what is known today.</p>","PeriodicalId":73024,"journal":{"name":"FEMS microbes","volume":"2 ","pages":"xtab002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/dd/xtab002.PMC10117864.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive history of motility and Archaellation in Archaea.\",\"authors\":\"Ken F Jarrell, Sonja-Verena Albers, J Nuno de Sousa Machado\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/femsmc/xtab002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Each of the three Domains of life, Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea, have swimming structures that were all originally called flagella, despite the fact that none were evolutionarily related to either of the other two. Surprisingly, this was true even in the two prokaryotic Domains of Bacteria and Archaea. Beginning in the 1980s, evidence gradually accumulated that convincingly demonstrated that the motility organelle in Archaea was unrelated to that found in Bacteria, but surprisingly shared significant similarities to type IV pili. This information culminated in the proposal, in 2012, that the 'archaeal flagellum' be assigned a new name, the archaellum. In this review, we provide a historical overview on archaella and motility research in Archaea, beginning with the first simple observations of motile extreme halophilic archaea a century ago up to state-of-the-art cryo-tomography of the archaellum motor complex and filament observed today. In addition to structural and biochemical data which revealed the archaellum to be a type IV pilus-like structure repurposed as a rotating nanomachine (Beeby <i>et al</i>. 2020), we also review the initial discoveries and subsequent advances using a wide variety of approaches to reveal: complex regulatory events that lead to the assembly of the archaellum filaments (archaellation); the roles of the various archaellum proteins; key post-translational modifications of the archaellum structural subunits; evolutionary relationships; functions of archaella other than motility and the biotechnological potential of this fascinating structure. The progress made in understanding the structure and assembly of the archaellum is highlighted by comparing early models to what is known today.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"volume\":\"2 \",\"pages\":\"xtab002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/10/dd/xtab002.PMC10117864.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FEMS microbes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtab002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FEMS microbes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/femsmc/xtab002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
真核生物、细菌和古细菌这三个生命领域中的每一个都有游泳结构,这些结构最初都被称为鞭毛,尽管它们在进化过程中都与其他两个领域无关。令人惊讶的是,即使在细菌和古细菌这两个原核生物领域也是如此。从 20 世纪 80 年代开始,逐渐积累的证据令人信服地证明,古细菌的运动细胞器与细菌中的运动细胞器无关,但却与 IV 型纤毛虫有着惊人的相似之处。这些信息最终促使人们在 2012 年提议将 "古鞭毛 "命名为 "古细 胞"。在这篇综述中,我们概述了古细菌和古细菌运动性研究的历史,从一个世纪前首次对极端嗜卤古细菌运动性的简单观察开始,一直到今天观察到的古细菌运动复合体和细丝的最先进低温层析成像技术。除了结构和生化数据揭示了弓形体是一种被重新用作旋转纳米机械的 IV 型柔毛状结构(Beeby et al.2020),我们还回顾了最初的发现和随后的进展,这些发现和进展采用了多种方法来揭示:导致弓形虫丝组装(弓形)的复杂调控事件;各种弓形虫蛋白的作用;弓形虫结构亚基的关键翻译后修饰;进化关系;弓形虫除运动之外的功能以及这种迷人结构的生物技术潜力。通过将早期模型与当今已知模型进行比较,重点介绍了在了解弓形体结构和组装方面取得的进展。
A comprehensive history of motility and Archaellation in Archaea.
Each of the three Domains of life, Eukarya, Bacteria and Archaea, have swimming structures that were all originally called flagella, despite the fact that none were evolutionarily related to either of the other two. Surprisingly, this was true even in the two prokaryotic Domains of Bacteria and Archaea. Beginning in the 1980s, evidence gradually accumulated that convincingly demonstrated that the motility organelle in Archaea was unrelated to that found in Bacteria, but surprisingly shared significant similarities to type IV pili. This information culminated in the proposal, in 2012, that the 'archaeal flagellum' be assigned a new name, the archaellum. In this review, we provide a historical overview on archaella and motility research in Archaea, beginning with the first simple observations of motile extreme halophilic archaea a century ago up to state-of-the-art cryo-tomography of the archaellum motor complex and filament observed today. In addition to structural and biochemical data which revealed the archaellum to be a type IV pilus-like structure repurposed as a rotating nanomachine (Beeby et al. 2020), we also review the initial discoveries and subsequent advances using a wide variety of approaches to reveal: complex regulatory events that lead to the assembly of the archaellum filaments (archaellation); the roles of the various archaellum proteins; key post-translational modifications of the archaellum structural subunits; evolutionary relationships; functions of archaella other than motility and the biotechnological potential of this fascinating structure. The progress made in understanding the structure and assembly of the archaellum is highlighted by comparing early models to what is known today.