帕利珠单抗免疫对高危儿童真的有效吗?

Marjana Jerković Raguž, Tomica Božić, Tamara Nikše
{"title":"帕利珠单抗免疫对高危儿童真的有效吗?","authors":"Marjana Jerković Raguž,&nbsp;Tomica Božić,&nbsp;Tamara Nikše","doi":"10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this research is to determine the specific characteristics of the immunized children during a 15-year period and the readmissions to hospital due to potential infections of the respiratory tract.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the period from October 2008 to March 2022. The test group consists of 222 infants who met the strict criteria for immunization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study observed 222 infants who were immunized with palivizumab during the 14-year period. 124 (55.9%) infants were preterm (< 32 weeks) and 69 (31.1%) were infants with congenital heart defects, whereas 29 (13.1%) exhibited other individual risk factors. 38 (17.1%) were re-admitted to the pulmonary ward. Upon re-admission, a quick test to diagnose for RSV infections was conducted and only one infant tested positive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conclusion of our 14-year study is that palivizumab prophylaxis has truly proven itself effective for infants at risk in our region during the research time period. Over the years, the immunization season has not changed and the number of doses hasremained the same, as have the indications for immunization. What has changed, however, is an increase in the number of immunized infants without a significant increase in the number of re-admissions to hospital on account of respiratory disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":73842,"journal":{"name":"Journal of mother and child","volume":"26 1","pages":"87-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is immunization with palivizumab really effective in high-risk children?\",\"authors\":\"Marjana Jerković Raguž,&nbsp;Tomica Božić,&nbsp;Tamara Nikše\",\"doi\":\"10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this research is to determine the specific characteristics of the immunized children during a 15-year period and the readmissions to hospital due to potential infections of the respiratory tract.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the period from October 2008 to March 2022. The test group consists of 222 infants who met the strict criteria for immunization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study observed 222 infants who were immunized with palivizumab during the 14-year period. 124 (55.9%) infants were preterm (< 32 weeks) and 69 (31.1%) were infants with congenital heart defects, whereas 29 (13.1%) exhibited other individual risk factors. 38 (17.1%) were re-admitted to the pulmonary ward. Upon re-admission, a quick test to diagnose for RSV infections was conducted and only one infant tested positive.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conclusion of our 14-year study is that palivizumab prophylaxis has truly proven itself effective for infants at risk in our region during the research time period. Over the years, the immunization season has not changed and the number of doses hasremained the same, as have the indications for immunization. What has changed, however, is an increase in the number of immunized infants without a significant increase in the number of re-admissions to hospital on account of respiratory disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of mother and child\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"87-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032334/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of mother and child\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of mother and child","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34763/jmotherandchild.20222601.d-22-00049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是确定15年期间接种疫苗的儿童的具体特征和因潜在的呼吸道感染而再入院的情况。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究于2008年10月至2022年3月进行。试验组由222名符合严格免疫标准的婴儿组成。结果:该研究观察了222名在14年期间接种了帕利珠单抗的婴儿。早产儿(< 32周)124例(55.9%),先天性心脏缺陷69例(31.1%),其他个体危险因素29例(13.1%)。38例(17.1%)再次入住肺病房。在再次入院时,进行了诊断呼吸道合胞病毒感染的快速测试,只有一名婴儿检测呈阳性。结果:我们14年的研究结论是,在研究期间,帕利珠单抗预防确实证明了它对我们地区有风险的婴儿是有效的。多年来,免疫季节没有改变,剂量数量保持不变,免疫适应症也没有改变。然而,发生变化的是,接种疫苗的婴儿人数有所增加,但因呼吸系统疾病再次入院的人数没有显著增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is immunization with palivizumab really effective in high-risk children?

Is immunization with palivizumab really effective in high-risk children?

Is immunization with palivizumab really effective in high-risk children?

Aim: The aim of this research is to determine the specific characteristics of the immunized children during a 15-year period and the readmissions to hospital due to potential infections of the respiratory tract.

Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in the period from October 2008 to March 2022. The test group consists of 222 infants who met the strict criteria for immunization.

Results: The study observed 222 infants who were immunized with palivizumab during the 14-year period. 124 (55.9%) infants were preterm (< 32 weeks) and 69 (31.1%) were infants with congenital heart defects, whereas 29 (13.1%) exhibited other individual risk factors. 38 (17.1%) were re-admitted to the pulmonary ward. Upon re-admission, a quick test to diagnose for RSV infections was conducted and only one infant tested positive.

Results: The conclusion of our 14-year study is that palivizumab prophylaxis has truly proven itself effective for infants at risk in our region during the research time period. Over the years, the immunization season has not changed and the number of doses hasremained the same, as have the indications for immunization. What has changed, however, is an increase in the number of immunized infants without a significant increase in the number of re-admissions to hospital on account of respiratory disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信