经济稀缺性对种族认知的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Psychological Reports Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-14 DOI:10.1177/00332941231169666
Rosana de Almeida Antunes, Edimilson Dos Santos Gonçalves, Leonardo Gomes Bernardino, João Guilherme Siqueira Casalecchi, Ivan Bouchardet da Fonseca Grebot, Rui de Moraes
{"title":"经济稀缺性对种族认知的影响。","authors":"Rosana de Almeida Antunes, Edimilson Dos Santos Gonçalves, Leonardo Gomes Bernardino, João Guilherme Siqueira Casalecchi, Ivan Bouchardet da Fonseca Grebot, Rui de Moraes","doi":"10.1177/00332941231169666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Racial socioeconomic gaps are widened in periods of economic recession. Besides social and institutional factors, black people also struggle with many psychological factors. The literature reports racial-biased complex behaviors and high-level processes that are influenced by economic scarcity. A previous study found a bias at the perceptual level: an experimental manipulation of scarcity (a subliminal priming paradigm) lowered the black-white race categorization threshold. Here we present a conceptual replication in a higher ecological setup. In our main analysis we compared the categorization threshold of participants that received the Brazilian government's emergency economic aid in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>n</i> = 136) and participants that did not receive the economic aid (<i>n</i> = 135) in an online psychophysical task that presented faces in a black-white race continuum<i>.</i> Additionally, we analyzed the economic impact of COVID-19 on household income, and in cases of family unemployment. Our results do not support the claim that perception of race is influenced by economic scarcity. Interestingly, we found that when people differ greatly in terms of racial prejudice, they encode visual information related to race differently. People with higher scores on a prejudice scale needed more phenotypic traits of the black race to categorize a face as black. We discuss the results in terms of differences in method and sample.</p>","PeriodicalId":21149,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Reports","volume":" ","pages":"1768-1792"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Economic Scarcity on Race Perception.\",\"authors\":\"Rosana de Almeida Antunes, Edimilson Dos Santos Gonçalves, Leonardo Gomes Bernardino, João Guilherme Siqueira Casalecchi, Ivan Bouchardet da Fonseca Grebot, Rui de Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00332941231169666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Racial socioeconomic gaps are widened in periods of economic recession. Besides social and institutional factors, black people also struggle with many psychological factors. The literature reports racial-biased complex behaviors and high-level processes that are influenced by economic scarcity. A previous study found a bias at the perceptual level: an experimental manipulation of scarcity (a subliminal priming paradigm) lowered the black-white race categorization threshold. Here we present a conceptual replication in a higher ecological setup. In our main analysis we compared the categorization threshold of participants that received the Brazilian government's emergency economic aid in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (<i>n</i> = 136) and participants that did not receive the economic aid (<i>n</i> = 135) in an online psychophysical task that presented faces in a black-white race continuum<i>.</i> Additionally, we analyzed the economic impact of COVID-19 on household income, and in cases of family unemployment. Our results do not support the claim that perception of race is influenced by economic scarcity. Interestingly, we found that when people differ greatly in terms of racial prejudice, they encode visual information related to race differently. People with higher scores on a prejudice scale needed more phenotypic traits of the black race to categorize a face as black. We discuss the results in terms of differences in method and sample.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1768-1792\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231169666\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941231169666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在经济衰退时期,种族社会经济差距会扩大。除了社会和制度因素外,黑人还面临着许多心理因素的困扰。文献报道了受经济稀缺性影响的种族偏见复杂行为和高层过程。先前的一项研究发现了知觉层面上的偏见:对稀缺性的实验操作(阈下启动范式)降低了黑人-白人种族分类阈值。在这里,我们提出了一个概念上的复制在一个更高的生态设置。在我们的主要分析中,我们比较了在COVID-19大流行背景下接受巴西政府紧急经济援助的参与者(n = 136)和未接受经济援助的参与者(n = 135)的分类阈值,这些参与者在一项在线心理物理任务中呈现黑白种族连续体的面孔。此外,我们还分析了COVID-19对家庭收入和家庭失业情况的经济影响。我们的结果不支持种族观念受经济稀缺性影响的说法。有趣的是,我们发现,当人们在种族偏见方面存在很大差异时,他们对与种族相关的视觉信息的编码也不同。在偏见量表上得分较高的人需要更多黑人种族的表型特征来将一张脸归类为黑人。我们根据方法和样本的差异来讨论结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of Economic Scarcity on Race Perception.

Racial socioeconomic gaps are widened in periods of economic recession. Besides social and institutional factors, black people also struggle with many psychological factors. The literature reports racial-biased complex behaviors and high-level processes that are influenced by economic scarcity. A previous study found a bias at the perceptual level: an experimental manipulation of scarcity (a subliminal priming paradigm) lowered the black-white race categorization threshold. Here we present a conceptual replication in a higher ecological setup. In our main analysis we compared the categorization threshold of participants that received the Brazilian government's emergency economic aid in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 136) and participants that did not receive the economic aid (n = 135) in an online psychophysical task that presented faces in a black-white race continuum. Additionally, we analyzed the economic impact of COVID-19 on household income, and in cases of family unemployment. Our results do not support the claim that perception of race is influenced by economic scarcity. Interestingly, we found that when people differ greatly in terms of racial prejudice, they encode visual information related to race differently. People with higher scores on a prejudice scale needed more phenotypic traits of the black race to categorize a face as black. We discuss the results in terms of differences in method and sample.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Reports
Psychological Reports PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
171
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信