Fernando Cobo, Virginia Pérez-Carrasco, Lina Martín-Hita, José Antonio García-Salcedo, José María Navarro-Marí
{"title":"MALDI-TOF MS和16S rRNA基因测序用于鉴定临床相关厌氧菌的比较评估:差异结果的关键评估。","authors":"Fernando Cobo, Virginia Pérez-Carrasco, Lina Martín-Hita, José Antonio García-Salcedo, José María Navarro-Marí","doi":"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The main study objective was to evaluate the correlation between matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing results for the identification of anaerobes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted of all anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinically significant specimens. MALDI-TOF (Bruker Byotyper) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed in all strains. Identifications were considered correct when the concordance with gene sequencing was ≥99%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 364 isolates of anaerobic bacteria: 201 (55.2%) Gram-negative and 163 (44.8%) Gram-positive, mostly belonging to the genus <em>Bacteroides</em>. Isolates were largely obtained from blood cultures (128/35.4%) and intra-abdominal samples (116/32.1%). Overall, 87.3% of isolates were identified at species level using the version 9 database (89.5% of Gram-negative and 84.6% of Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria). All isolates belonging to the species <em>B. fragilis sensu stricto</em> were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS, but five cases of <em>Phocaeicola (Bacteroides) dorei</em> were misidentified as <em>Phocaeicola</em> (<em>Bacteroides) vulgatus;</em> all <em>Prevotella</em> isolates were correctly identified at the genus level, and most were correctly identified at the species level. Among Gram-positive anaerobes, 12 <em>Anaerococcus</em> species were not identified by MALDI-TOF MS, while six cases identified as <em>Peptoniphilus indolicus</em> were found to belong to other genera/species.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MALDI-TOF is a reliable technique for identifying most anaerobic bacteria, although the database needs frequent updating to identify rare, infrequent, and newly discovered species.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria: critical evaluation of discrepant results\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Cobo, Virginia Pérez-Carrasco, Lina Martín-Hita, José Antonio García-Salcedo, José María Navarro-Marí\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anaerobe.2023.102754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The main study objective was to evaluate the correlation between matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing results for the identification of anaerobes.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective study was conducted of all anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinically significant specimens. MALDI-TOF (Bruker Byotyper) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed in all strains. Identifications were considered correct when the concordance with gene sequencing was ≥99%.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The study included 364 isolates of anaerobic bacteria: 201 (55.2%) Gram-negative and 163 (44.8%) Gram-positive, mostly belonging to the genus <em>Bacteroides</em>. Isolates were largely obtained from blood cultures (128/35.4%) and intra-abdominal samples (116/32.1%). Overall, 87.3% of isolates were identified at species level using the version 9 database (89.5% of Gram-negative and 84.6% of Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria). All isolates belonging to the species <em>B. fragilis sensu stricto</em> were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS, but five cases of <em>Phocaeicola (Bacteroides) dorei</em> were misidentified as <em>Phocaeicola</em> (<em>Bacteroides) vulgatus;</em> all <em>Prevotella</em> isolates were correctly identified at the genus level, and most were correctly identified at the species level. Among Gram-positive anaerobes, 12 <em>Anaerococcus</em> species were not identified by MALDI-TOF MS, while six cases identified as <em>Peptoniphilus indolicus</em> were found to belong to other genera/species.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>MALDI-TOF is a reliable technique for identifying most anaerobic bacteria, although the database needs frequent updating to identify rare, infrequent, and newly discovered species.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107599642300063X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107599642300063X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative evaluation of MALDI-TOF MS and 16S rRNA gene sequencing for the identification of clinically relevant anaerobic bacteria: critical evaluation of discrepant results
Objectives
The main study objective was to evaluate the correlation between matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing results for the identification of anaerobes.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted of all anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinically significant specimens. MALDI-TOF (Bruker Byotyper) and 16S rRNA gene sequencing were performed in all strains. Identifications were considered correct when the concordance with gene sequencing was ≥99%.
Results
The study included 364 isolates of anaerobic bacteria: 201 (55.2%) Gram-negative and 163 (44.8%) Gram-positive, mostly belonging to the genus Bacteroides. Isolates were largely obtained from blood cultures (128/35.4%) and intra-abdominal samples (116/32.1%). Overall, 87.3% of isolates were identified at species level using the version 9 database (89.5% of Gram-negative and 84.6% of Gram-positive anaerobic bacteria). All isolates belonging to the species B. fragilis sensu stricto were correctly identified by MALDI-TOF MS, but five cases of Phocaeicola (Bacteroides) dorei were misidentified as Phocaeicola (Bacteroides) vulgatus; all Prevotella isolates were correctly identified at the genus level, and most were correctly identified at the species level. Among Gram-positive anaerobes, 12 Anaerococcus species were not identified by MALDI-TOF MS, while six cases identified as Peptoniphilus indolicus were found to belong to other genera/species.
Conclusions
MALDI-TOF is a reliable technique for identifying most anaerobic bacteria, although the database needs frequent updating to identify rare, infrequent, and newly discovered species.