Patrick Emery, André Klarsfeld, Ralf Stanewsky, Orie T Shafer
{"title":"敏感的时间:对时间生物学基础文本的重新评估。","authors":"Patrick Emery, André Klarsfeld, Ralf Stanewsky, Orie T Shafer","doi":"10.1177/07487304231169080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The origin of experimental chronobiology can be traced to observations made in the 18<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> centuries on the sensitive plant <i>Mimosa</i>, which were described in two seminal reports: Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan's \"<i>Observation Botanique</i>\" (A <i>Botanical Observation</i>) and Augustin Pyramus de Candolle's \"<i>Du sommeil des feuilles</i>\" (<i>On the sleep of leaves</i>). Both report observations of the striking daily closing and opening of <i>Mimosa</i> leaves in controlled environments. This review presents translations of both texts with the aim of staying as faithful as possible to the original French texts. We also present the historical context in which these texts were written and link them to subsequent experiments that aimed at testing the veracity of their central conclusions. In particular, we definitely establish that Mairan himself presented his work to the French Royal Academy of Sciences, while the published report of his observation was authored by Fontenelle, the Secretary of the Academy. In addition, we offer a translation of Mairan's own presentation, based on the hand-written minutes of the academy. Finally, we discuss the decades of work on plant rhythms that laid the foundation for modern experimental chronobiology, including translations and discussion of the insightful and prescient reports by Charles François de Cisternay Dufay, Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Johann Gottfried Zinn, and Wilhelm Pfeffer, which describe their efforts to reproduce and extend Mairan's pioneering observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitive Timing: A Reappraisal of Chronobiology's Foundational Texts.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Emery, André Klarsfeld, Ralf Stanewsky, Orie T Shafer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07487304231169080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The origin of experimental chronobiology can be traced to observations made in the 18<sup>th</sup> and 19<sup>th</sup> centuries on the sensitive plant <i>Mimosa</i>, which were described in two seminal reports: Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan's \\\"<i>Observation Botanique</i>\\\" (A <i>Botanical Observation</i>) and Augustin Pyramus de Candolle's \\\"<i>Du sommeil des feuilles</i>\\\" (<i>On the sleep of leaves</i>). Both report observations of the striking daily closing and opening of <i>Mimosa</i> leaves in controlled environments. This review presents translations of both texts with the aim of staying as faithful as possible to the original French texts. We also present the historical context in which these texts were written and link them to subsequent experiments that aimed at testing the veracity of their central conclusions. In particular, we definitely establish that Mairan himself presented his work to the French Royal Academy of Sciences, while the published report of his observation was authored by Fontenelle, the Secretary of the Academy. In addition, we offer a translation of Mairan's own presentation, based on the hand-written minutes of the academy. Finally, we discuss the decades of work on plant rhythms that laid the foundation for modern experimental chronobiology, including translations and discussion of the insightful and prescient reports by Charles François de Cisternay Dufay, Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Johann Gottfried Zinn, and Wilhelm Pfeffer, which describe their efforts to reproduce and extend Mairan's pioneering observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07487304231169080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07487304231169080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
实验时间生物学的起源可以追溯到18世纪和19世纪对敏感植物含羞草的观察,这在两份开创性的报告中得到了描述:让-雅克·d'Ortous de Mairan的《植物学观察》和Augustin Pyramus de Candolle的《关于树叶的睡眠》。两者都报告了在受控环境中含羞草叶子的惊人的每日闭合和打开的观察结果。这篇评论介绍了两个文本的翻译,目的是尽可能忠实于法语原文。我们还介绍了撰写这些文本的历史背景,并将它们与随后旨在测试其中心结论准确性的实验联系起来。特别是,我们明确地确定,Mairan本人向法国皇家科学院提交了他的工作,而发表的他的观察报告是由科学院秘书Fontenelle撰写的。此外,我们还根据学院的手写会议记录,翻译了Mairan自己的演讲。最后,我们讨论了几十年来在植物节律方面的工作,这些工作为现代实验时间生物学奠定了基础,包括对Charles franois de Cisternay Dufay, Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Johann Gottfried Zinn和Wilhelm Pfeffer的富有见地和先见性的报告的翻译和讨论,这些报告描述了他们为复制和扩展Mairan的开创性观察所做的努力。
Sensitive Timing: A Reappraisal of Chronobiology's Foundational Texts.
The origin of experimental chronobiology can be traced to observations made in the 18th and 19th centuries on the sensitive plant Mimosa, which were described in two seminal reports: Jean-Jacques d'Ortous de Mairan's "Observation Botanique" (A Botanical Observation) and Augustin Pyramus de Candolle's "Du sommeil des feuilles" (On the sleep of leaves). Both report observations of the striking daily closing and opening of Mimosa leaves in controlled environments. This review presents translations of both texts with the aim of staying as faithful as possible to the original French texts. We also present the historical context in which these texts were written and link them to subsequent experiments that aimed at testing the veracity of their central conclusions. In particular, we definitely establish that Mairan himself presented his work to the French Royal Academy of Sciences, while the published report of his observation was authored by Fontenelle, the Secretary of the Academy. In addition, we offer a translation of Mairan's own presentation, based on the hand-written minutes of the academy. Finally, we discuss the decades of work on plant rhythms that laid the foundation for modern experimental chronobiology, including translations and discussion of the insightful and prescient reports by Charles François de Cisternay Dufay, Henri Louis Duhamel du Monceau, Johann Gottfried Zinn, and Wilhelm Pfeffer, which describe their efforts to reproduce and extend Mairan's pioneering observations.