系统审查跨部门伙伴关系在促进体育活动方面的障碍和促进因素。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Perspectives in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-18 DOI:10.1177/17579139231170784
V Kolovou, N Bolton, D Crone, S Willis, J Walklett
{"title":"系统审查跨部门伙伴关系在促进体育活动方面的障碍和促进因素。","authors":"V Kolovou, N Bolton, D Crone, S Willis, J Walklett","doi":"10.1177/17579139231170784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the barriers and facilitators that cross-sector partners face in promoting physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, ProQuest Central, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus to identify published records dating from 1986 to August 2021. We searched for public health interventions drawn from partnerships, where the partners worked across sectors and their shared goal was to promote or increase physical activity through partnership approaches. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme UK (CASP) checklist and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to guide the critical appraisal of included records, and thematic analysis to summarise and synthesise the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings (<i>n</i> = 32 articles) described public health interventions (<i>n</i> = 19) aiming to promote physical activity through cross-sector collaboration and/or partnerships. We identified barriers, facilitators and recommendations in relation to four broad themes: approaching and selecting partners, funding, building capacity and taking joint action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Common challenges that partners face are related to allocating time and resources, and sustaining momentum. Identifying similarities and differences between partners early on and building good relationships, strong momentum and trust can take considerable time. However, these factors may be essential for fruitful collaboration. Boundary spanners in the physical activity system could help translate differences and consolidate common ground between cross-sector partners, accelerating joint leadership and introducing systems thinking.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42020226207.</p>","PeriodicalId":47256,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives in Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"369-380"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to cross-sector partnerships in promoting physical activity.\",\"authors\":\"V Kolovou, N Bolton, D Crone, S Willis, J Walklett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17579139231170784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To review the barriers and facilitators that cross-sector partners face in promoting physical activity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, ProQuest Central, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus to identify published records dating from 1986 to August 2021. We searched for public health interventions drawn from partnerships, where the partners worked across sectors and their shared goal was to promote or increase physical activity through partnership approaches. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme UK (CASP) checklist and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to guide the critical appraisal of included records, and thematic analysis to summarise and synthesise the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings (<i>n</i> = 32 articles) described public health interventions (<i>n</i> = 19) aiming to promote physical activity through cross-sector collaboration and/or partnerships. We identified barriers, facilitators and recommendations in relation to four broad themes: approaching and selecting partners, funding, building capacity and taking joint action.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Common challenges that partners face are related to allocating time and resources, and sustaining momentum. Identifying similarities and differences between partners early on and building good relationships, strong momentum and trust can take considerable time. However, these factors may be essential for fruitful collaboration. Boundary spanners in the physical activity system could help translate differences and consolidate common ground between cross-sector partners, accelerating joint leadership and introducing systems thinking.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42020226207.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives in Public Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"369-380\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619192/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives in Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139231170784\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17579139231170784","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:审查跨部门合作伙伴在促进体育活动方面面临的障碍和促进因素。方法:我们搜索Medline、Embase、PsychINFO、ProQuest Central、SCOPUS和SPORTDiscus,以确定1986年至2021年8月的已发表记录。我们从伙伴关系中寻找公共卫生干预措施,在伙伴关系中,合作伙伴跨部门工作,他们的共同目标是通过伙伴关系方法促进或增加体育活动。我们使用英国关键评估技能计划(CASP)检查表和非随机干预研究中的偏见风险(ROBINS-I)工具来指导对纳入记录的关键评估,并使用主题分析来总结和综合研究结果。结果:研究结果(n=32篇文章)描述了旨在通过跨部门合作和/或伙伴关系促进体育活动的公共卫生干预措施(n=19)。我们确定了与四大主题有关的障碍、促进者和建议:接触和选择合作伙伴、筹资、能力建设和采取联合行动。结论:合作伙伴面临的共同挑战与分配时间和资源以及保持势头有关。尽早识别合作伙伴之间的相似之处和差异,并建立良好的关系、强大的势头和信任可能需要相当长的时间。然而,这些因素可能对富有成效的合作至关重要。体育活动系统中的边界扳手可以帮助转换跨部门合作伙伴之间的差异并巩固共同点,加快联合领导并引入系统思维。Prospero注册号:CRD42020226207。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of the barriers and facilitators to cross-sector partnerships in promoting physical activity.

Aims: To review the barriers and facilitators that cross-sector partners face in promoting physical activity.

Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, ProQuest Central, SCOPUS and SPORTDiscus to identify published records dating from 1986 to August 2021. We searched for public health interventions drawn from partnerships, where the partners worked across sectors and their shared goal was to promote or increase physical activity through partnership approaches. We used the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme UK (CASP) checklist and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to guide the critical appraisal of included records, and thematic analysis to summarise and synthesise the findings.

Results: Findings (n = 32 articles) described public health interventions (n = 19) aiming to promote physical activity through cross-sector collaboration and/or partnerships. We identified barriers, facilitators and recommendations in relation to four broad themes: approaching and selecting partners, funding, building capacity and taking joint action.

Conclusion: Common challenges that partners face are related to allocating time and resources, and sustaining momentum. Identifying similarities and differences between partners early on and building good relationships, strong momentum and trust can take considerable time. However, these factors may be essential for fruitful collaboration. Boundary spanners in the physical activity system could help translate differences and consolidate common ground between cross-sector partners, accelerating joint leadership and introducing systems thinking.

Prospero registration number: CRD42020226207.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perspectives in Public Health
Perspectives in Public Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
1.70%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Perspectives in Public Health is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed journal. It is practice orientated and features current topics and opinions; news and views on current health issues; case studies; book reviews; letters to the Editor; as well as updates on the Society"s work. The journal also commissions articles for themed issues and publishes original peer-reviewed articles. Perspectives in Public Health"s primary aim is to be an invaluable resource for the Society"s members, who are health-promoting professionals from many disciplines, including environmental health, health protection, health and safety, food safety and nutrition, building and engineering, primary care, academia and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信