美国南部阳离子植物化学景观的对比。

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) Pub Date : 2022-10-04 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01 DOI:10.1002/pei3.10093
Luis Y Santiago-Rosario, Kyle E Harms, Dylan Craven
{"title":"美国南部阳离子植物化学景观的对比。","authors":"Luis Y Santiago-Rosario, Kyle E Harms, Dylan Craven","doi":"10.1002/pei3.10093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding the phytochemical landscapes of essential and nonessential chemical elements to plants provides an opportunity to better link biogeochemical cycles to trophic ecology. We investigated the formation and regulation of the cationic phytochemical landscapes of four key elements for biota: Ca, Mg, K, and Na. We collected aboveground tissues of plants in <i>Atriplex</i>, <i>Helianthus</i>, and <i>Opuntia</i> and adjacent soils from 51, 131, and 83 sites, respectively, across the southern United States. We determined the spatial variability of these cations in plants and soils. Also, we quantified the homeostasis coefficient for each cation and genus combination, by using mixed-effect models, with spatially correlated random effects. Additionally, using random forest models, we modeled the influence of bioclimatic, soil, and spatial variables on plant cationic concentrations. Sodium variability and spatial autocorrelation were considerably greater than for Ca, Mg, or K. Calcium, Mg, and K exhibited strongly homeostatic patterns, in striking contrast to non-homeostatic Na. Even so, climatic and soil variables explained a large proportion of plants' cationic concentrations. Essential elements (Ca, Mg, and K) appeared to be homeostatically regulated, which contrasted sharply with Na, a nonessential element for most plants. In addition, we provide evidence for the No-Escape-from-Sodium hypothesis in real-world ecosystems, indicating that plant Na concentrations tend to increase as substrate Na levels increase.</p>","PeriodicalId":74457,"journal":{"name":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","volume":"3 5","pages":"226-241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasts among cationic phytochemical landscapes in the southern United States.\",\"authors\":\"Luis Y Santiago-Rosario, Kyle E Harms, Dylan Craven\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pei3.10093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Understanding the phytochemical landscapes of essential and nonessential chemical elements to plants provides an opportunity to better link biogeochemical cycles to trophic ecology. We investigated the formation and regulation of the cationic phytochemical landscapes of four key elements for biota: Ca, Mg, K, and Na. We collected aboveground tissues of plants in <i>Atriplex</i>, <i>Helianthus</i>, and <i>Opuntia</i> and adjacent soils from 51, 131, and 83 sites, respectively, across the southern United States. We determined the spatial variability of these cations in plants and soils. Also, we quantified the homeostasis coefficient for each cation and genus combination, by using mixed-effect models, with spatially correlated random effects. Additionally, using random forest models, we modeled the influence of bioclimatic, soil, and spatial variables on plant cationic concentrations. Sodium variability and spatial autocorrelation were considerably greater than for Ca, Mg, or K. Calcium, Mg, and K exhibited strongly homeostatic patterns, in striking contrast to non-homeostatic Na. Even so, climatic and soil variables explained a large proportion of plants' cationic concentrations. Essential elements (Ca, Mg, and K) appeared to be homeostatically regulated, which contrasted sharply with Na, a nonessential element for most plants. In addition, we provide evidence for the No-Escape-from-Sodium hypothesis in real-world ecosystems, indicating that plant Na concentrations tend to increase as substrate Na levels increase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"volume\":\"3 5\",\"pages\":\"226-241\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10168053/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解植物必需和非必需化学元素的植物化学景观为更好地将生物地球化学循环与营养生态学联系起来提供了机会。我们研究了生物群中四种关键元素的阳离子植物化学景观的形成和调节:钙、镁、钾和钠。我们分别从美国南部的 51 个、131 个和 83 个地点采集了 Atriplex、Helianthus 和 Opuntia 植物的地上组织及邻近土壤。我们测定了这些阳离子在植物和土壤中的空间变化。此外,我们还利用具有空间相关随机效应的混合效应模型,量化了每种阳离子和种属组合的平衡系数。此外,我们还利用随机森林模型,模拟了生物气候、土壤和空间变量对植物阳离子浓度的影响。钙、镁和钾表现出强烈的同调模式,与非同调的钠形成鲜明对比。即便如此,气候和土壤变量仍能解释植物阳离子浓度的大部分原因。必需元素(钙、镁和钾)似乎受到同态调节,这与大多数植物的非必需元素 Na 形成了鲜明对比。此外,我们还提供了现实世界生态系统中 "无钠可逃 "假说的证据,表明植物的 Na 浓度往往会随着基质 Na 含量的增加而增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Contrasts among cationic phytochemical landscapes in the southern United States.

Contrasts among cationic phytochemical landscapes in the southern United States.

Contrasts among cationic phytochemical landscapes in the southern United States.

Contrasts among cationic phytochemical landscapes in the southern United States.

Understanding the phytochemical landscapes of essential and nonessential chemical elements to plants provides an opportunity to better link biogeochemical cycles to trophic ecology. We investigated the formation and regulation of the cationic phytochemical landscapes of four key elements for biota: Ca, Mg, K, and Na. We collected aboveground tissues of plants in Atriplex, Helianthus, and Opuntia and adjacent soils from 51, 131, and 83 sites, respectively, across the southern United States. We determined the spatial variability of these cations in plants and soils. Also, we quantified the homeostasis coefficient for each cation and genus combination, by using mixed-effect models, with spatially correlated random effects. Additionally, using random forest models, we modeled the influence of bioclimatic, soil, and spatial variables on plant cationic concentrations. Sodium variability and spatial autocorrelation were considerably greater than for Ca, Mg, or K. Calcium, Mg, and K exhibited strongly homeostatic patterns, in striking contrast to non-homeostatic Na. Even so, climatic and soil variables explained a large proportion of plants' cationic concentrations. Essential elements (Ca, Mg, and K) appeared to be homeostatically regulated, which contrasted sharply with Na, a nonessential element for most plants. In addition, we provide evidence for the No-Escape-from-Sodium hypothesis in real-world ecosystems, indicating that plant Na concentrations tend to increase as substrate Na levels increase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信