模仿老鼠:在老鼠的觅食任务中通过观察来学习。

IF 1.9 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Corrine Keshen, Mark Cole, Sarah Buck, Peter Khouri
{"title":"模仿老鼠:在老鼠的觅食任务中通过观察来学习。","authors":"Corrine Keshen,&nbsp;Mark Cole,&nbsp;Sarah Buck,&nbsp;Peter Khouri","doi":"10.3758/s13420-022-00525-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In two experiments, rats observed expert foragers in a laboratory foraging task. In both experiments, 12 towers with a food cup on top of each tower were placed in a circle. Six towers, marked with black and white stripes, had cups baited with cheese, and were located in randomly selected positions on successive trials. The other six towers were white with food cups that were sham baited with inaccessible food. In both experiments, during Phase 1, demonstrator rats eventually learned to find the baited towers, making approximately 90% correct choices in their first six choices. In Phase 2, observer rats each had an opportunity to observe, from a cage located inside the circle of towers, a now-expert demonstrator forage. Half of the observers were able to observe a cage mate, whereas the other half of the observers were able to observe a non-cage mate. After a delay of about 2 min (Experiment 1) or about 24 h (Experiment 2), the observers were allowed to forage among the rebaited towers. In both experiments, the observers performed better during their 20 Phase 2 trials than the demonstrators had performed during their first 20 Phase 1 trials. But, in both experiments, there was no clearly significant difference between the performance of observers able to watch cage mates as opposed to non-cage mates. Because the observational effect seen in both experiments survived a 24-h delay between observation and performance, it was deemed to have been based on learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":49914,"journal":{"name":"Learning & Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Copy rats: Learning by observation during a foraging task by rats.\",\"authors\":\"Corrine Keshen,&nbsp;Mark Cole,&nbsp;Sarah Buck,&nbsp;Peter Khouri\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13420-022-00525-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In two experiments, rats observed expert foragers in a laboratory foraging task. In both experiments, 12 towers with a food cup on top of each tower were placed in a circle. Six towers, marked with black and white stripes, had cups baited with cheese, and were located in randomly selected positions on successive trials. The other six towers were white with food cups that were sham baited with inaccessible food. In both experiments, during Phase 1, demonstrator rats eventually learned to find the baited towers, making approximately 90% correct choices in their first six choices. In Phase 2, observer rats each had an opportunity to observe, from a cage located inside the circle of towers, a now-expert demonstrator forage. Half of the observers were able to observe a cage mate, whereas the other half of the observers were able to observe a non-cage mate. After a delay of about 2 min (Experiment 1) or about 24 h (Experiment 2), the observers were allowed to forage among the rebaited towers. In both experiments, the observers performed better during their 20 Phase 2 trials than the demonstrators had performed during their first 20 Phase 1 trials. But, in both experiments, there was no clearly significant difference between the performance of observers able to watch cage mates as opposed to non-cage mates. Because the observational effect seen in both experiments survived a 24-h delay between observation and performance, it was deemed to have been based on learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning & Behavior\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning & Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00525-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning & Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00525-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在两个实验中,大鼠观察了实验室觅食任务中的专家觅食者。在这两个实验中,12座塔被放置成一个圆圈,每个塔的顶部都有一个食物杯。在连续的试验中,六座标有黑白条纹的塔上有用奶酪做诱饵的杯子,它们被随机地放置在选定的位置。其他六座塔是白色的,上面有食物杯,上面装着难以接近的食物。在这两个实验中,在第一阶段,示范鼠最终学会了找到诱饵塔,在前六个选择中做出了大约90%的正确选择。在第二阶段,每只观察老鼠都有机会从位于塔圈内的笼子里观察一个现在已经成为专家的示范饲料。一半的观察者能够观察到笼子里的同伴,而另一半的观察者能够观察到非笼子里的同伴。延迟约2分钟(实验1)或约24小时(实验2)后,观察员被允许在重新安装的塔中觅食。在这两个实验中,观察者在他们的20个第二阶段试验中的表现都比演示者在前20个第一阶段试验中的表现要好。但是,在这两个实验中,能够观察笼子里同伴的观察者和不能观察笼子里同伴的观察者之间的表现并没有明显的显著差异。因为在两个实验中观察到的观察效应在观察和表现之间的24小时延迟中仍然存在,所以它被认为是基于学习的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Copy rats: Learning by observation during a foraging task by rats.

In two experiments, rats observed expert foragers in a laboratory foraging task. In both experiments, 12 towers with a food cup on top of each tower were placed in a circle. Six towers, marked with black and white stripes, had cups baited with cheese, and were located in randomly selected positions on successive trials. The other six towers were white with food cups that were sham baited with inaccessible food. In both experiments, during Phase 1, demonstrator rats eventually learned to find the baited towers, making approximately 90% correct choices in their first six choices. In Phase 2, observer rats each had an opportunity to observe, from a cage located inside the circle of towers, a now-expert demonstrator forage. Half of the observers were able to observe a cage mate, whereas the other half of the observers were able to observe a non-cage mate. After a delay of about 2 min (Experiment 1) or about 24 h (Experiment 2), the observers were allowed to forage among the rebaited towers. In both experiments, the observers performed better during their 20 Phase 2 trials than the demonstrators had performed during their first 20 Phase 1 trials. But, in both experiments, there was no clearly significant difference between the performance of observers able to watch cage mates as opposed to non-cage mates. Because the observational effect seen in both experiments survived a 24-h delay between observation and performance, it was deemed to have been based on learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Learning & Behavior
Learning & Behavior 医学-动物学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Learning & Behavior publishes experimental and theoretical contributions and critical reviews concerning fundamental processes of learning and behavior in nonhuman and human animals. Topics covered include sensation, perception, conditioning, learning, attention, memory, motivation, emotion, development, social behavior, and comparative investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信