Tushar N Bhosale, Kalyani Bhate, Sherwin Samuel, George Jacob
{"title":"物理镊子和传统镊子在拔除上颌臼齿时的功效比较评估。","authors":"Tushar N Bhosale, Kalyani Bhate, Sherwin Samuel, George Jacob","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth extraction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in dentistry. It is usually a traumatic procedure often resulting in immediate destruction and loss of alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues. It is the only dental procedure which was carried out by dentists in the previous centuries and various instruments have evolved for this procedure over time. Atraumatic extraction is one of the essential dental procedures, as atraumatic extraction leads to proper wound healing and appropriate bone healing. Physics forceps have got a new role in extraction technique, that it makes just one contact point with the tooth as a unique benefit. Physics forceps depends on the physics of rotational power, lever and torque much like a bottle top removal. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of physics forceps and conventional forces in the extraction of maxillary molar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adults aged 18-50 diagnosed with grossly decayed maxillary molars with poor endodontic prognosis and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with dilacerate roots; patients with systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thyroid, tuberculosis, epilepsy seizures, COVID-19 positive; patients' non-acceptance to voluntarily participate in research a refusal to sign the informed consent. Parameters such as a crown fracture or root fracture; buccal bone fracture; time taken for extraction and operator ease on the VAS scale are assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that with the use of physics forces, there was very less incidence of crown fracture and no incidence of buccal bone fracture, whereas with the conventional forceps the result showed that in almost all the time taken for extraction was much more in conventional forcep and the operator ease rating was more with conventional forceps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hence, oral surgeons as well as general practitioner should adapt the use of physics forceps in routine extractions.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forcep and conventional forceps for extraction of maxillary molars.\",\"authors\":\"Tushar N Bhosale, Kalyani Bhate, Sherwin Samuel, George Jacob\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tooth extraction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in dentistry. It is usually a traumatic procedure often resulting in immediate destruction and loss of alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues. It is the only dental procedure which was carried out by dentists in the previous centuries and various instruments have evolved for this procedure over time. Atraumatic extraction is one of the essential dental procedures, as atraumatic extraction leads to proper wound healing and appropriate bone healing. Physics forceps have got a new role in extraction technique, that it makes just one contact point with the tooth as a unique benefit. Physics forceps depends on the physics of rotational power, lever and torque much like a bottle top removal. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of physics forceps and conventional forces in the extraction of maxillary molar.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eligible participants were adults aged 18-50 diagnosed with grossly decayed maxillary molars with poor endodontic prognosis and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with dilacerate roots; patients with systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thyroid, tuberculosis, epilepsy seizures, COVID-19 positive; patients' non-acceptance to voluntarily participate in research a refusal to sign the informed consent. Parameters such as a crown fracture or root fracture; buccal bone fracture; time taken for extraction and operator ease on the VAS scale are assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that with the use of physics forces, there was very less incidence of crown fracture and no incidence of buccal bone fracture, whereas with the conventional forceps the result showed that in almost all the time taken for extraction was much more in conventional forcep and the operator ease rating was more with conventional forceps.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hence, oral surgeons as well as general practitioner should adapt the use of physics forceps in routine extractions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva dental and oral science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.23.04740-X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:拔牙是牙科最常见的手术之一。拔牙通常是一种创伤性手术,往往会导致牙槽骨和周围软组织的直接破坏和损失。在过去的几个世纪中,拔牙是牙医进行的唯一牙科手术,随着时间的推移,拔牙器械也不断发展。创伤性拔牙是必不可少的牙科手术之一,因为创伤性拔牙可以促进伤口的愈合和适当的骨愈合。物理镊子在拔牙技术中发挥了新的作用,它与牙齿只有一个接触点,具有独特的优势。物理镊子依赖于旋转力、杠杆和扭矩的物理学原理,就像瓶盖拔牙一样。本研究旨在评估物理镊和传统镊子在拔除上颌臼齿时的功效:符合条件的参与者为年龄在 18-50 岁之间、被诊断患有严重蛀牙且牙髓预后不良的上颌臼齿并愿意参与研究的成年人。排除标准如下:牙根扩张的患者;患有高血压、糖尿病、甲状腺、肺结核、癫痫发作、COVID-19 阳性等全身性疾病的患者;不接受自愿参与研究或拒绝签署知情同意书的患者。对牙冠折断或牙根折断、颊骨折断、拔牙所需时间和操作者在 VAS 量表上的轻松程度等参数进行评估:结果表明,使用物理力时,牙冠骨折的发生率非常低,颊骨骨折的发生率也不高,而使用传统镊子时,结果表明几乎所有的拔牙时间都比传统镊子要长得多,操作舒适度评分也比传统镊子要高:因此,口腔外科医生和全科医生应在常规拔牙中使用物理学镊子。
Comparative evaluation of efficacy of physics forcep and conventional forceps for extraction of maxillary molars.
Background: Tooth extraction is one of the most commonly performed procedures in dentistry. It is usually a traumatic procedure often resulting in immediate destruction and loss of alveolar bone and surrounding soft tissues. It is the only dental procedure which was carried out by dentists in the previous centuries and various instruments have evolved for this procedure over time. Atraumatic extraction is one of the essential dental procedures, as atraumatic extraction leads to proper wound healing and appropriate bone healing. Physics forceps have got a new role in extraction technique, that it makes just one contact point with the tooth as a unique benefit. Physics forceps depends on the physics of rotational power, lever and torque much like a bottle top removal. A study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of physics forceps and conventional forces in the extraction of maxillary molar.
Methods: Eligible participants were adults aged 18-50 diagnosed with grossly decayed maxillary molars with poor endodontic prognosis and willing to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria were as follows: patients with dilacerate roots; patients with systemic diseases like hypertension, diabetes mellitus, thyroid, tuberculosis, epilepsy seizures, COVID-19 positive; patients' non-acceptance to voluntarily participate in research a refusal to sign the informed consent. Parameters such as a crown fracture or root fracture; buccal bone fracture; time taken for extraction and operator ease on the VAS scale are assessed.
Results: Results showed that with the use of physics forces, there was very less incidence of crown fracture and no incidence of buccal bone fracture, whereas with the conventional forceps the result showed that in almost all the time taken for extraction was much more in conventional forcep and the operator ease rating was more with conventional forceps.
Conclusions: Hence, oral surgeons as well as general practitioner should adapt the use of physics forceps in routine extractions.