针对自杀危机客户的压力处理模式。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Johanna M Mickelson, Daniel W Cox, Richard A Young, David Kealy
{"title":"针对自杀危机客户的压力处理模式。","authors":"Johanna M Mickelson, Daniel W Cox, Richard A Young, David Kealy","doi":"10.1027/0227-5910/a000907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. <i>Aims:</i> To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. <i>Methods:</i> Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing model's validity using a longitudinal design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. <i>Results:</i> In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight, and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the model's validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes. <i>Limitation:</i> Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. <i>Conclusion:</i> Our findings provide a framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.</p>","PeriodicalId":47943,"journal":{"name":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"18-25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Distress-Processing Model for Clients in Suicidal Crisis.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna M Mickelson, Daniel W Cox, Richard A Young, David Kealy\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/0227-5910/a000907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. <i>Aims:</i> To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. <i>Methods:</i> Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing model's validity using a longitudinal design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. <i>Results:</i> In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight, and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the model's validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes. <i>Limitation:</i> Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. <i>Conclusion:</i> Our findings provide a framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis-The Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危机干预框架指出,自杀危机中的求助者必须更好地了解自己的痛苦,以减少自杀倾向,但目前尚不清楚自杀危机中的求助者如何处理自己的痛苦。目的:开发(研究 1)并验证(研究 2)一个针对自杀危机中的求助者的顺序性痛苦处理模型。研究方法:研究 1 采用任务分析法,由三个阶段组成,最终形成了一个理论和实证相结合的模型。在研究 2 中,我们采用了纵向设计来检验痛苦处理模型的有效性。在这两项研究中,数据都是与处于自杀危机中的成年人进行的在线危机聊天。研究结果在研究 1 中,我们建立了一个连续的五阶段苦恼处理模型:(第一阶段)未参与苦恼,(第二阶段)意识到苦恼,(第三阶段)明确苦恼,(第四阶段)洞察苦恼,以及(第五阶段)应用苦恼洞察。在研究 2 中,该模型的有效性得到了以下证据的支持:(H1)处理阶段的进展是有顺序的;(H2)结果好的客户比结果差的客户在处理过程中取得了更大的进展。局限性:有自杀倾向但未披露其自杀倾向的求助者未包括在内。结论我们的研究结果提供了一个框架,用于概念化和操作化求助者如何经历自杀危机,从而促进干预和研究的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Distress-Processing Model for Clients in Suicidal Crisis.

Background: While crisis intervention frameworks have indicated the importance of clients in suicidal crisis better understanding their distress to decrease suicidality, it is unclear how clients in suicidal crisis process their distress. Aims: To develop (Study 1) and validate (Study 2) a sequential distress-processing model for clients in suicidal crisis. Methods: Applying task analysis, Study 1 consisted of three phases, which resulted in a theoretically and empirically informed model. In Study 2, we examined the distress-processing model's validity using a longitudinal design. In both studies, data were online crisis chats with adults in suicidal crisis. Results: In Study 1, we developed a sequential five-stage distress-processing model: (Stage 1) unengaged with distress, (Stage 2) distress awareness, (Stage 3) distress clarity, (Stage 4) distress insight, and (Stage 5) applying distress insight. In Study 2, the model's validity was supported via evidence that (H1) progression through the processing stages was sequential and (H2) clients with good outcomes had greater progression in their processing than clients with poor outcomes. Limitation: Clients who were suicidal but did not disclose their suicidality were not included. Conclusion: Our findings provide a framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing how clients move through suicidal crises, which can facilitate intervention and research developments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: A must for all who need to keep up on the latest findings from both basic research and practical experience in the fields of suicide prevention and crisis intervention! This well-established periodical’s reputation for publishing important articles on suicidology and crisis intervention from around the world is being further enhanced with the move to 6 issues per year (previously 4) in 2010. But over and above its scientific reputation, Crisis also publishes potentially life-saving information for all those involved in crisis intervention and suicide prevention, making it important reading for clinicians, counselors, hotlines, and crisis intervention centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信