腹膜后肾脏测量评分系统(RETRO)用于微创部分肾切除术。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sunyi Ye, Lixian Zhu, Ping Wang, Xinxing Sun, Xin Xu, Feng Zhao, Xiaolin Yao, Qiang Huang, Yun Dai, Dan Xia, Shuo Wang
{"title":"腹膜后肾脏测量评分系统(RETRO)用于微创部分肾切除术。","authors":"Sunyi Ye,&nbsp;Lixian Zhu,&nbsp;Ping Wang,&nbsp;Xinxing Sun,&nbsp;Xin Xu,&nbsp;Feng Zhao,&nbsp;Xiaolin Yao,&nbsp;Qiang Huang,&nbsp;Yun Dai,&nbsp;Dan Xia,&nbsp;Shuo Wang","doi":"10.22037/uj.v20i.7519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a standardized scoring system of renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy based on mini-invasiveness and retroperitoneal approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred and five patients in retroperitoneal group were prospectively enrolled from January 2017 to December 2018. Perioperative characteristics of all patients were collected: age, gender, BMI, preoperative blood test and imaging results, operation time (the time period starts from the skin incision to the final skin closure), estimated blood lost, clamping time, complications within 30 days, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathology. An algorithm was extracted, and it was used to predict the risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptoms, ASA score and RETRO score were significantly correlated to postoperative complications, excluding tumor size, ischemia time and operation time. Adjusted RETRO points were an independent factor to predict complication rate (p = 0.006). Limitation was that it did not analyze the relationship between the RETRO score and the long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RETRO score simplifies the risk evaluation of partial nephrectomy for patients with renal tumor, especially benefits those surgeries performed under robot-assisted laparoscope via retroperitoneal approach. The new RETRO score system that we developed is a selection criterion to perform surgery via different approaches, and an accurate system to evaluate the complexity during partial nephrectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":23416,"journal":{"name":"Urology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retroperitoneal Nephrometry Scoring System (RETRO) for Minimal-Invasive Partial Nephrectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sunyi Ye,&nbsp;Lixian Zhu,&nbsp;Ping Wang,&nbsp;Xinxing Sun,&nbsp;Xin Xu,&nbsp;Feng Zhao,&nbsp;Xiaolin Yao,&nbsp;Qiang Huang,&nbsp;Yun Dai,&nbsp;Dan Xia,&nbsp;Shuo Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.22037/uj.v20i.7519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose a standardized scoring system of renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy based on mini-invasiveness and retroperitoneal approach.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One-hundred and five patients in retroperitoneal group were prospectively enrolled from January 2017 to December 2018. Perioperative characteristics of all patients were collected: age, gender, BMI, preoperative blood test and imaging results, operation time (the time period starts from the skin incision to the final skin closure), estimated blood lost, clamping time, complications within 30 days, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathology. An algorithm was extracted, and it was used to predict the risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptoms, ASA score and RETRO score were significantly correlated to postoperative complications, excluding tumor size, ischemia time and operation time. Adjusted RETRO points were an independent factor to predict complication rate (p = 0.006). Limitation was that it did not analyze the relationship between the RETRO score and the long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RETRO score simplifies the risk evaluation of partial nephrectomy for patients with renal tumor, especially benefits those surgeries performed under robot-assisted laparoscope via retroperitoneal approach. The new RETRO score system that we developed is a selection criterion to perform surgery via different approaches, and an accurate system to evaluate the complexity during partial nephrectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v20i.7519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:提出一种基于微创腹膜后入路的适用于肾部分切除的肾肿瘤标准化评分系统。材料和方法:腹膜后组105名患者于2017年1月至2018年12月前瞻性入选。收集所有患者的围手术期特征:年龄、性别、BMI、术前血液检查和影像学结果、手术时间(从皮肤切开到最终皮肤闭合的时间段)、估计失血量、夹紧时间、30天内并发症、美国麻醉师学会(ASA)评分、病理学。提取了一种算法,并将其用于预测并发症的风险。结果:症状、ASA评分和RETRO评分与术后并发症显著相关,不包括肿瘤大小、缺血时间和手术时间。调整后的RETRO评分是预测并发症发生率的独立因素(p=0.006)。局限性在于它没有分析RETRO评分与长期结果之间的关系。结论:RETRO评分简化了肾肿瘤患者肾部分切除的风险评估,尤其有利于在机器人辅助腹腔镜下通过腹膜后入路进行的手术。我们开发的新的RETRO评分系统是通过不同方法进行手术的选择标准,也是评估部分肾切除术复杂性的准确系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retroperitoneal Nephrometry Scoring System (RETRO) for Minimal-Invasive Partial Nephrectomy.

Purpose: To propose a standardized scoring system of renal tumors suitable for partial nephrectomy based on mini-invasiveness and retroperitoneal approach.

Materials and methods: One-hundred and five patients in retroperitoneal group were prospectively enrolled from January 2017 to December 2018. Perioperative characteristics of all patients were collected: age, gender, BMI, preoperative blood test and imaging results, operation time (the time period starts from the skin incision to the final skin closure), estimated blood lost, clamping time, complications within 30 days, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, pathology. An algorithm was extracted, and it was used to predict the risk of complications.

Results: Symptoms, ASA score and RETRO score were significantly correlated to postoperative complications, excluding tumor size, ischemia time and operation time. Adjusted RETRO points were an independent factor to predict complication rate (p = 0.006). Limitation was that it did not analyze the relationship between the RETRO score and the long-term outcomes.

Conclusion: The RETRO score simplifies the risk evaluation of partial nephrectomy for patients with renal tumor, especially benefits those surgeries performed under robot-assisted laparoscope via retroperitoneal approach. The new RETRO score system that we developed is a selection criterion to perform surgery via different approaches, and an accurate system to evaluate the complexity during partial nephrectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Journal
Urology Journal UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Urology and Nephrology Research Center (UNRC) and the Iranian Urological Association (IUA), Urology Journal is a comprehensive digest of useful information on modern urology. Emphasis is on practical information that reflects the latest diagnostic and treatment techniques. Our objectives are to provide an exceptional source of current and clinically relevant research in the discipline of urology, to reflect the scientific work and progress of our colleagues, and to present the articles in a logical, timely, and concise format that meets the diverse needs of today’s urologist. Urology Journal publishes manuscripts on urology and kidney transplantation, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. Accordingly, original articles, case reports, and letters to editor are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信