在怀疑有心源性或肺源性急性呼吸困难时,对患者进行造影检查。

BJR open Pub Date : 2023-02-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1259/bjro.20220026
Ruxandra-Iulia Milos, Carmen Bartha, Sebastian Röhrich, Benedikt H Heidinger, Florian Prayer, Lucian Beer, Christian Wassipaul, Daria Kifjak, Martin L Watzenboeck, Svitlana Pochepnia, Helmut Prosch
{"title":"在怀疑有心源性或肺源性急性呼吸困难时,对患者进行造影检查。","authors":"Ruxandra-Iulia Milos, Carmen Bartha, Sebastian Röhrich, Benedikt H Heidinger, Florian Prayer, Lucian Beer, Christian Wassipaul, Daria Kifjak, Martin L Watzenboeck, Svitlana Pochepnia, Helmut Prosch","doi":"10.1259/bjro.20220026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A wide spectrum of conditions, from life-threatening to non-urgent, can manifest with acute dyspnea, thus presenting major challenges for the treating physician when establishing the diagnosis and severity of the underlying disease. Imaging plays a decisive role in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac and/or pulmonary origin. This article presents an overview of the current imaging modalities used to narrow the differential diagnosis in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin. The current indications, findings, accuracy, and limits of each imaging modality are reported. Chest radiography is usually the primary imaging modality applied. There is a low radiation dose associated with this method, and it can assess the presence of fluid in the lung or pleura, consolidations, hyperinflation, pneumothorax, as well as heart enlargement. However, its low sensitivity limits the ability of the chest radiograph to accurately identify the causes of acute dyspnea. CT provides more detailed imaging of the cardiorespiratory system, and therefore, better sensitivity and specificity results, but it is accompanied by higher radiation exposure. Ultrasonography has the advantage of using no radiation, and is fast and feasible as a bedside test and appropriate for the assessment of unstable patients. However, patient-specific factors, such as body habitus, may limit its image quality and interpretability. Advances in knowledge This review provides guidance to the appropriate choice of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":72419,"journal":{"name":"BJR open","volume":"5 1","pages":"20220026"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging in patients with acute dyspnea when cardiac or pulmonary origin is suspected.\",\"authors\":\"Ruxandra-Iulia Milos, Carmen Bartha, Sebastian Röhrich, Benedikt H Heidinger, Florian Prayer, Lucian Beer, Christian Wassipaul, Daria Kifjak, Martin L Watzenboeck, Svitlana Pochepnia, Helmut Prosch\",\"doi\":\"10.1259/bjro.20220026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A wide spectrum of conditions, from life-threatening to non-urgent, can manifest with acute dyspnea, thus presenting major challenges for the treating physician when establishing the diagnosis and severity of the underlying disease. Imaging plays a decisive role in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac and/or pulmonary origin. This article presents an overview of the current imaging modalities used to narrow the differential diagnosis in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin. The current indications, findings, accuracy, and limits of each imaging modality are reported. Chest radiography is usually the primary imaging modality applied. There is a low radiation dose associated with this method, and it can assess the presence of fluid in the lung or pleura, consolidations, hyperinflation, pneumothorax, as well as heart enlargement. However, its low sensitivity limits the ability of the chest radiograph to accurately identify the causes of acute dyspnea. CT provides more detailed imaging of the cardiorespiratory system, and therefore, better sensitivity and specificity results, but it is accompanied by higher radiation exposure. Ultrasonography has the advantage of using no radiation, and is fast and feasible as a bedside test and appropriate for the assessment of unstable patients. However, patient-specific factors, such as body habitus, may limit its image quality and interpretability. Advances in knowledge This review provides guidance to the appropriate choice of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJR open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"20220026\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10077421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJR open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220026\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjro.20220026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从危及生命到非急症,多种疾病都可能表现为急性呼吸困难,因此给主治医生确定潜在疾病的诊断和严重程度带来了重大挑战。在评估心源性和/或肺源性急性呼吸困难时,影像学起着决定性作用。本文概述了目前在评估心源性或肺源性急性呼吸困难时用于缩小鉴别诊断范围的影像学模式。文章还报告了每种成像方式目前的适应症、检查结果、准确性和局限性。胸部放射摄影通常是主要的成像方式。这种方法的辐射剂量较低,可评估肺部或胸膜是否存在积液、合并症、过度充气、气胸以及心脏是否增大。然而,由于其灵敏度较低,限制了胸片准确识别急性呼吸困难病因的能力。CT 可提供更详细的心肺系统成像,因此灵敏度和特异性更高,但辐射量更大。超声波检查的优点是无辐射,作为床旁检查快速可行,适合对病情不稳定的患者进行评估。然而,患者的特定因素(如体型)可能会限制其图像质量和可解释性。知识进展 本综述为诊断心源性或肺源性呼吸困难患者时适当选择成像模式提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Imaging in patients with acute dyspnea when cardiac or pulmonary origin is suspected.

Imaging in patients with acute dyspnea when cardiac or pulmonary origin is suspected.

Imaging in patients with acute dyspnea when cardiac or pulmonary origin is suspected.

Imaging in patients with acute dyspnea when cardiac or pulmonary origin is suspected.

A wide spectrum of conditions, from life-threatening to non-urgent, can manifest with acute dyspnea, thus presenting major challenges for the treating physician when establishing the diagnosis and severity of the underlying disease. Imaging plays a decisive role in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac and/or pulmonary origin. This article presents an overview of the current imaging modalities used to narrow the differential diagnosis in the assessment of acute dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin. The current indications, findings, accuracy, and limits of each imaging modality are reported. Chest radiography is usually the primary imaging modality applied. There is a low radiation dose associated with this method, and it can assess the presence of fluid in the lung or pleura, consolidations, hyperinflation, pneumothorax, as well as heart enlargement. However, its low sensitivity limits the ability of the chest radiograph to accurately identify the causes of acute dyspnea. CT provides more detailed imaging of the cardiorespiratory system, and therefore, better sensitivity and specificity results, but it is accompanied by higher radiation exposure. Ultrasonography has the advantage of using no radiation, and is fast and feasible as a bedside test and appropriate for the assessment of unstable patients. However, patient-specific factors, such as body habitus, may limit its image quality and interpretability. Advances in knowledge This review provides guidance to the appropriate choice of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of patients with dyspnea of cardiac or pulmonary origin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信