超越步数:将磨损时间纳入下肢截肢的假肢使用评估。

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Nicholas S DeGrasse, Joseph C Mertens, Jacob T Brzostowski, Katheryn J Allyn, Andrew C Vamos, Adam J Krout, Brian J Hafner, Joseph L Garbini, Joan E Sanders
{"title":"超越步数:将磨损时间纳入下肢截肢的假肢使用评估。","authors":"Nicholas S DeGrasse, Joseph C Mertens, Jacob T Brzostowski, Katheryn J Allyn, Andrew C Vamos, Adam J Krout, Brian J Hafner, Joseph L Garbini, Joan E Sanders","doi":"10.1177/20556683231163337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to test a novel activity monitor that tracks the time a prosthesis is worn, and the nature of the ambulatory activity conducted with the prosthesis. These capabilities allow prosthesis users' wear and accommodation practices (e.g., temporary doffing) to be monitored, and the intensity of their activities to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A portable limb-socket motion sensing system was used to monitor doffs, walk bouts (≥5 steps), low locomotion (2-4 steps), stationary positions, and weight shifts in a group of transtibial prosthesis users. The relationship between doff time and active motion time was investigated, and durations of low and high intensity active motions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 14 participants tested, the median prosthesis day duration ranged from 12.8-18.8 h. Eleven participants typically doffed five or fewer times per day, and three participants typically doffed 10 or more times per day. Nine participants demonstrated a positive correlation between daily doff duration and active motion duration. Six participants spent more time in weight shifts than walk bouts, while eight participants spent more time in walk bouts than weight shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Capturing don time and temporary doffs and distinguishing weight shifts from walks may provide insight relevant to patient care. Longer-term monitoring studies should be conducted, and the clinical utility of the data evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":43319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/31/10.1177_20556683231163337.PMC10021104.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas S DeGrasse, Joseph C Mertens, Jacob T Brzostowski, Katheryn J Allyn, Andrew C Vamos, Adam J Krout, Brian J Hafner, Joseph L Garbini, Joan E Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20556683231163337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to test a novel activity monitor that tracks the time a prosthesis is worn, and the nature of the ambulatory activity conducted with the prosthesis. These capabilities allow prosthesis users' wear and accommodation practices (e.g., temporary doffing) to be monitored, and the intensity of their activities to be assessed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A portable limb-socket motion sensing system was used to monitor doffs, walk bouts (≥5 steps), low locomotion (2-4 steps), stationary positions, and weight shifts in a group of transtibial prosthesis users. The relationship between doff time and active motion time was investigated, and durations of low and high intensity active motions were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the 14 participants tested, the median prosthesis day duration ranged from 12.8-18.8 h. Eleven participants typically doffed five or fewer times per day, and three participants typically doffed 10 or more times per day. Nine participants demonstrated a positive correlation between daily doff duration and active motion duration. Six participants spent more time in weight shifts than walk bouts, while eight participants spent more time in walk bouts than weight shifts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Capturing don time and temporary doffs and distinguishing weight shifts from walks may provide insight relevant to patient care. Longer-term monitoring studies should be conducted, and the clinical utility of the data evaluated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/e7/31/10.1177_20556683231163337.PMC10021104.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231163337\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20556683231163337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究的目的是测试一种新型活动监测器,该监测器可跟踪假肢的佩戴时间和假肢活动的性质。通过这些功能,可以监测假肢使用者的佩戴和适应情况(如临时脱下假肢),并评估其活动强度:方法:使用便携式肢窝运动传感系统监控一组经胫假肢使用者的脱落、步行(≥5步)、低速运动(2-4步)、静止姿势和重心移动。研究了脱位时间和主动运动时间之间的关系,并比较了低强度和高强度主动运动的持续时间:在接受测试的 14 名参与者中,假肢日持续时间的中位数为 12.8-18.8 小时。11 名参与者通常每天脱下假肢 5 次或更少,3 名参与者通常每天脱下假肢 10 次或更多。九名参与者的每日脱下假肢持续时间与主动运动持续时间呈正相关。六名参与者负重移动的时间多于步行的时间,而八名参与者步行的时间多于负重移动的时间:结论:捕捉别离时间和临时别离,并区分负重移动和步行,可为患者护理提供相关启示。应进行更长期的监测研究,并对数据的临床实用性进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to test a novel activity monitor that tracks the time a prosthesis is worn, and the nature of the ambulatory activity conducted with the prosthesis. These capabilities allow prosthesis users' wear and accommodation practices (e.g., temporary doffing) to be monitored, and the intensity of their activities to be assessed.

Methods: A portable limb-socket motion sensing system was used to monitor doffs, walk bouts (≥5 steps), low locomotion (2-4 steps), stationary positions, and weight shifts in a group of transtibial prosthesis users. The relationship between doff time and active motion time was investigated, and durations of low and high intensity active motions were compared.

Results: For the 14 participants tested, the median prosthesis day duration ranged from 12.8-18.8 h. Eleven participants typically doffed five or fewer times per day, and three participants typically doffed 10 or more times per day. Nine participants demonstrated a positive correlation between daily doff duration and active motion duration. Six participants spent more time in weight shifts than walk bouts, while eight participants spent more time in walk bouts than weight shifts.

Conclusion: Capturing don time and temporary doffs and distinguishing weight shifts from walks may provide insight relevant to patient care. Longer-term monitoring studies should be conducted, and the clinical utility of the data evaluated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信