评估万古霉素与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦并用时基于低谷给药法和基于曲线下面积(AUC)给药法的安全性

IF 1.1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2022-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-13 DOI:10.1177/87551225221101736
Cassandra Karas, Kyle Manning, Darrell T Childress, Elizabeth W Covington, Melanie M Manis
{"title":"评估万古霉素与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦并用时基于低谷给药法和基于曲线下面积(AUC)给药法的安全性","authors":"Cassandra Karas, Kyle Manning, Darrell T Childress, Elizabeth W Covington, Melanie M Manis","doi":"10.1177/87551225221101736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a common antibiotic combination used in hospitals, and there has been increasing data indicating that the combination is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if the dosing method of vancomycin would mitigate the risk of AKI seen with VPT. <b>Objective</b>: To observe and compare incidence of AKI in patients on VPT when using the trough-based dosing method versus the area-under-the-curve (AUC)-based dosing method. <b>Methods</b>: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study at 3 community hospitals. Adults receiving at least 48 hours of VPT were included. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, pregnant patients, prisoners, and patients with central nervous system infections, or malignancy were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI as defined by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. <b>Results:</b> A total of 300 patients were included in the study; 150 patients in both the trough and AUC groups. A total of 23 patients (15%) in the trough group and 17 patients (11%) in the AUC group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7058, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.3603, 1.3826], <i>P</i> = .3098). <b>Conclusion and Relevance</b>: The incidence of AKI was lower in the AUC group compared with the trough group; however, this was not significant. The results of our study suggest that there is no difference between incidence of AKI when using trough- or AUC-based dosing in those receiving VPT. Because of the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, more data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272489/pdf/10.1177_87551225221101736.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Safety of Trough Versus Area Under the Curve (AUC)-Based Dosing Method of Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam.\",\"authors\":\"Cassandra Karas, Kyle Manning, Darrell T Childress, Elizabeth W Covington, Melanie M Manis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/87551225221101736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a common antibiotic combination used in hospitals, and there has been increasing data indicating that the combination is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if the dosing method of vancomycin would mitigate the risk of AKI seen with VPT. <b>Objective</b>: To observe and compare incidence of AKI in patients on VPT when using the trough-based dosing method versus the area-under-the-curve (AUC)-based dosing method. <b>Methods</b>: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study at 3 community hospitals. Adults receiving at least 48 hours of VPT were included. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, pregnant patients, prisoners, and patients with central nervous system infections, or malignancy were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI as defined by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. <b>Results:</b> A total of 300 patients were included in the study; 150 patients in both the trough and AUC groups. A total of 23 patients (15%) in the trough group and 17 patients (11%) in the AUC group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7058, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.3603, 1.3826], <i>P</i> = .3098). <b>Conclusion and Relevance</b>: The incidence of AKI was lower in the AUC group compared with the trough group; however, this was not significant. The results of our study suggest that there is no difference between incidence of AKI when using trough- or AUC-based dosing in those receiving VPT. Because of the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, more data are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9272489/pdf/10.1177_87551225221101736.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmacy Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221101736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/6/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225221101736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:万古霉素和哌拉西林-他唑巴坦(VPT)是医院常用的抗生素组合,越来越多的数据表明,这种组合与急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率增加有关。目前尚不清楚万古霉素的给药方法是否能减轻 VPT 引起急性肾损伤的风险。目的观察并比较使用 VPT 的患者在使用基于谷值的给药方法和基于曲线下面积 (AUC) 的给药方法时的 AKI 发生率。方法:这是一项在 3 家社区医院进行的多中心、回顾性观察研究。研究对象包括接受至少 48 小时 VPT 治疗的成人。严重肾功能障碍患者、孕妇、囚犯、中枢神经系统感染患者或恶性肿瘤患者除外。主要结果是美国传染病学会(IDSA)标准定义的 AKI 发生率。结果:共有 300 名患者参与了研究;其中 150 名患者分属低谷组和 AUC 组。共有 23 名(15%)谷值组患者和 17 名(11%)AUC 组患者达到了主要结果(几率比 [OR]:0.7058,95% 置信度):0.7058,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[0.3603, 1.3826], P = .3098).结论与意义:与谷值组相比,AUC 组的 AKI 发生率较低;但差异并不显著。我们的研究结果表明,在接受 VPT 治疗的患者中,使用基于谷值或 AUC 的剂量时,AKI 发生率没有差异。由于样本量较小,且研究具有回顾性,因此还需要更多数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the Safety of Trough Versus Area Under the Curve (AUC)-Based Dosing Method of Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

Evaluating the Safety of Trough Versus Area Under the Curve (AUC)-Based Dosing Method of Vancomycin With Concomitant Piperacillin-Tazobactam.

Background: Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam (VPT) is a common antibiotic combination used in hospitals, and there has been increasing data indicating that the combination is associated with increased rates of acute kidney injury (AKI). It is unclear if the dosing method of vancomycin would mitigate the risk of AKI seen with VPT. Objective: To observe and compare incidence of AKI in patients on VPT when using the trough-based dosing method versus the area-under-the-curve (AUC)-based dosing method. Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, observational study at 3 community hospitals. Adults receiving at least 48 hours of VPT were included. Patients with severe renal dysfunction, pregnant patients, prisoners, and patients with central nervous system infections, or malignancy were excluded. The primary outcome was incidence of AKI as defined by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. Results: A total of 300 patients were included in the study; 150 patients in both the trough and AUC groups. A total of 23 patients (15%) in the trough group and 17 patients (11%) in the AUC group met the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR]: 0.7058, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.3603, 1.3826], P = .3098). Conclusion and Relevance: The incidence of AKI was lower in the AUC group compared with the trough group; however, this was not significant. The results of our study suggest that there is no difference between incidence of AKI when using trough- or AUC-based dosing in those receiving VPT. Because of the small sample size and retrospective nature of the study, more data are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信