Ajc Overgaauw, L J Meijboom, J van Es, E J Lust, E H Serne, Pwb Nanayakkara, Y M Smulders, A J Kooter, R W Sprengers, H J de Grooth, R J Lely, A Thijs, A Vonk Noordegraaf, Lma Heunks, Pwg Elbers, H J Bogaard, P R Tuinman, E J Nossent
{"title":"中高危急性肺栓塞患者的真实世界特征和预后。","authors":"Ajc Overgaauw, L J Meijboom, J van Es, E J Lust, E H Serne, Pwb Nanayakkara, Y M Smulders, A J Kooter, R W Sprengers, H J de Grooth, R J Lely, A Thijs, A Vonk Noordegraaf, Lma Heunks, Pwg Elbers, H J Bogaard, P R Tuinman, E J Nossent","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exact benefits of currently recommended close monitoring in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study determined clinical characteristics, and disease course of intermediate high risk acute PE patients in an academic hospital setting . Frequency of hemodynamic deterioration, use of rescue reperfusion therapy and PE related mortality, were outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 intermediate high risk PE patients included for analysis, 81 patients (83%) were closely monitored. Two deteriorated hemodynamically and were treated with rescue reperfusion therapy. One patient survived after this.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In these 98 intermediate high risk PE patients, hemodynamic deterioration occurred in three patients and rescue reperfusion therapy of two closely monitored patients led to survival of one. Underlining the need for better recognition of patients benefitting from and research in the optimal way of close monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"22 2","pages":"61-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism.\",\"authors\":\"Ajc Overgaauw, L J Meijboom, J van Es, E J Lust, E H Serne, Pwb Nanayakkara, Y M Smulders, A J Kooter, R W Sprengers, H J de Grooth, R J Lely, A Thijs, A Vonk Noordegraaf, Lma Heunks, Pwg Elbers, H J Bogaard, P R Tuinman, E J Nossent\",\"doi\":\"10.52964/AMJA.0936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exact benefits of currently recommended close monitoring in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study determined clinical characteristics, and disease course of intermediate high risk acute PE patients in an academic hospital setting . Frequency of hemodynamic deterioration, use of rescue reperfusion therapy and PE related mortality, were outcomes of interest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 98 intermediate high risk PE patients included for analysis, 81 patients (83%) were closely monitored. Two deteriorated hemodynamically and were treated with rescue reperfusion therapy. One patient survived after this.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In these 98 intermediate high risk PE patients, hemodynamic deterioration occurred in three patients and rescue reperfusion therapy of two closely monitored patients led to survival of one. Underlining the need for better recognition of patients benefitting from and research in the optimal way of close monitoring.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 2\",\"pages\":\"61-66\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Real-world characteristics and outcomes of patients with intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism.
Background: Exact benefits of currently recommended close monitoring in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) patients are unknown.
Methods: This prospective observational cohort study determined clinical characteristics, and disease course of intermediate high risk acute PE patients in an academic hospital setting . Frequency of hemodynamic deterioration, use of rescue reperfusion therapy and PE related mortality, were outcomes of interest.
Results: Of 98 intermediate high risk PE patients included for analysis, 81 patients (83%) were closely monitored. Two deteriorated hemodynamically and were treated with rescue reperfusion therapy. One patient survived after this.
Conclusions: In these 98 intermediate high risk PE patients, hemodynamic deterioration occurred in three patients and rescue reperfusion therapy of two closely monitored patients led to survival of one. Underlining the need for better recognition of patients benefitting from and research in the optimal way of close monitoring.
期刊介绍:
These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.